Brown Paper Chronicles: Refusal and the Limits of Collaborative Design Work with Indigenous Youth

Amy R. Mack, Jan Newberry
{"title":"Brown Paper Chronicles: Refusal and the Limits of Collaborative Design Work with Indigenous Youth","authors":"Amy R. Mack, Jan Newberry","doi":"10.1353/cla.2020.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In a collaborative project between a small university and a local nonprofit devoted to Indigenous children and their families, ethnographic improvisations based on design approaches were used as part of a digital storytelling project. Encounters were designed to produce an “ethical space” for translating childrearing values for which transmission has been interrupted by histories of residential schooling, assimilative adoptions, and continuing patterns of foster care. The final report of Canada’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission framed these improvisations to ethnographic methods that were meant to incorporate experts including researchers, young and old, university- and agency-based, settler and Indigenous. Hopes for moments of partial attunement between ontogenic-epistemic worlds to be achieved through para-ethnographic collaborative design approaches were challenged by moments of refusal. These moments took place in a collaborative space created to engender design thinking and co-conceptualization among para-ethnographers as part of the transition work that many are now calling for in the era of truth and reconciliation. Still, the translation work demanded of young Indigenous researchers meant a kind of doubled burden as cultural experts as well as young Indigenous people. Their refusals were generative, even as they suggested that collaborative methods may serve as yet another politics of recognition in the era of reconciliation.","PeriodicalId":88456,"journal":{"name":"Collaborative anthropologies","volume":"13 1","pages":"108 - 77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/cla.2020.0001","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collaborative anthropologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cla.2020.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:In a collaborative project between a small university and a local nonprofit devoted to Indigenous children and their families, ethnographic improvisations based on design approaches were used as part of a digital storytelling project. Encounters were designed to produce an “ethical space” for translating childrearing values for which transmission has been interrupted by histories of residential schooling, assimilative adoptions, and continuing patterns of foster care. The final report of Canada’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission framed these improvisations to ethnographic methods that were meant to incorporate experts including researchers, young and old, university- and agency-based, settler and Indigenous. Hopes for moments of partial attunement between ontogenic-epistemic worlds to be achieved through para-ethnographic collaborative design approaches were challenged by moments of refusal. These moments took place in a collaborative space created to engender design thinking and co-conceptualization among para-ethnographers as part of the transition work that many are now calling for in the era of truth and reconciliation. Still, the translation work demanded of young Indigenous researchers meant a kind of doubled burden as cultural experts as well as young Indigenous people. Their refusals were generative, even as they suggested that collaborative methods may serve as yet another politics of recognition in the era of reconciliation.
棕纸编年史:与原住民青年合作设计工作的拒绝与限制
摘要:在一所小型大学和一家致力于土著儿童及其家庭的当地非营利组织的合作项目中,基于设计方法的民族志即兴创作被用作数字讲故事项目的一部分。相遇旨在创造一个“道德空间”,用于转化育儿价值观,而寄宿学校教育、同化收养和持续的寄养模式的历史中断了这种价值观的传播。加拿大真相与和解委员会的最终报告将这些即兴创作纳入了人种学方法,旨在吸收包括研究人员、年轻人和老年人、大学和机构、定居者和土著人在内的专家。通过准人种学合作设计方法实现本体论认识世界之间部分协调的希望受到了拒绝时刻的挑战。这些时刻发生在一个合作空间中,该空间旨在在准民族志学家之间产生设计思维和共同概念,这是许多人在真相与和解时代所呼吁的过渡工作的一部分。尽管如此,对年轻土著研究人员的翻译工作要求意味着文化专家和年轻土著人的负担加倍。他们的拒绝是产生性的,尽管他们认为合作方法可能是和解时代的另一种承认政治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信