Ialenti, Vincent (2020) Deep Time Reckoning: How Future Thinking Can Help Earth Now

IF 1.9 4区 社会学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Antti Silvast
{"title":"Ialenti, Vincent (2020) Deep Time Reckoning: How Future Thinking Can Help Earth Now","authors":"Antti Silvast","doi":"10.23987/sts.102638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some energy policy choices have implications for decades into the future. Some choices have impacts centuries, tens of thousands, or hundreds of thousands of years from now. How can current planners know what these impacts will be? Vincent Ialenti’s book Deep Time Reckoning: How Future Thinking Can Help Earth Now examines professionals that forecast far-future geological, hydrological, and ecological events in nuclear waste storage. His fieldsite is in Finland: a country famous for its nuclear power programme and as a host for the world’s first anticipated deep geological nuclear waste repository, called Onkalo. This is a disposal option where the spent nuclear fuel is stored deep underground inside the Finnish bedrock. Onkalo is to open in 2023-2024 and contain the nuclear waste during the hundreds of thousands of years to come. Deep Time Reckoning studies deep time: timescales that concern geological events at much greater than human timescales. Ialenti writes not primarily for an academic treatise but for the educated expert and lay publics. He presents nuclear waste disposal to facilitate learning i.e. “deep time reckonings”. Ialenti deems these reckonings crucial at a moment when societies face a dual crisis: an ecological crisis and a putative intellectual crisis, a “deflation of expertise”, which indicates a generalised mistrust of expert authority and knowledge. The Finnish nuclear management expertise and its long perspectives “the world’s most long-sighted experts” (p. xiv) offers fresh insights in this situation. The book is empirically vast, including fieldwork that lasted 32 months (2012-2014) and covered 121 informants from nuclear waste management and its public regulation to research, companies, NGOs, and politicians. As an anthropologist, Ialenti adopts the famous maxim of “following the actors” and treats his informants as “humans with dreams, hobbies, anxieties, hopes, frustrations, quirks, passions, gossip, regrets, kindnesses, and opinions” (p. 20). His observations range from offices and seminars to even free time activities (including a family summer cottage). The educational contents include exercises that form a practical toolkit in deep time thinking. The sheer amount of material is and would be impressive for any academic or popular science work. The book’s introduction focuses on the key actors: the Finnish nuclear waste management company Posiva and the radiation and nuclear safety authority STUK. Between them is the Safety Case, a repository safety assessment report that is a precondition for the government-approved construction license for Onkalo. The Safety Case becomes a main topic for the ethnographic analysis, offering a window into the far-future Finland that is produced in the myriad of technical reports that constitute it. The first empirical chapter examines a key element of the Safety Case: analogy studies, where analogies of various sorts from Finnish prehistory to modern-day glaciers in Greenland are drawn upon to anticipate future Finland. The second chapter moves into computer modelling","PeriodicalId":45119,"journal":{"name":"Science and Technology Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science and Technology Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.102638","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Some energy policy choices have implications for decades into the future. Some choices have impacts centuries, tens of thousands, or hundreds of thousands of years from now. How can current planners know what these impacts will be? Vincent Ialenti’s book Deep Time Reckoning: How Future Thinking Can Help Earth Now examines professionals that forecast far-future geological, hydrological, and ecological events in nuclear waste storage. His fieldsite is in Finland: a country famous for its nuclear power programme and as a host for the world’s first anticipated deep geological nuclear waste repository, called Onkalo. This is a disposal option where the spent nuclear fuel is stored deep underground inside the Finnish bedrock. Onkalo is to open in 2023-2024 and contain the nuclear waste during the hundreds of thousands of years to come. Deep Time Reckoning studies deep time: timescales that concern geological events at much greater than human timescales. Ialenti writes not primarily for an academic treatise but for the educated expert and lay publics. He presents nuclear waste disposal to facilitate learning i.e. “deep time reckonings”. Ialenti deems these reckonings crucial at a moment when societies face a dual crisis: an ecological crisis and a putative intellectual crisis, a “deflation of expertise”, which indicates a generalised mistrust of expert authority and knowledge. The Finnish nuclear management expertise and its long perspectives “the world’s most long-sighted experts” (p. xiv) offers fresh insights in this situation. The book is empirically vast, including fieldwork that lasted 32 months (2012-2014) and covered 121 informants from nuclear waste management and its public regulation to research, companies, NGOs, and politicians. As an anthropologist, Ialenti adopts the famous maxim of “following the actors” and treats his informants as “humans with dreams, hobbies, anxieties, hopes, frustrations, quirks, passions, gossip, regrets, kindnesses, and opinions” (p. 20). His observations range from offices and seminars to even free time activities (including a family summer cottage). The educational contents include exercises that form a practical toolkit in deep time thinking. The sheer amount of material is and would be impressive for any academic or popular science work. The book’s introduction focuses on the key actors: the Finnish nuclear waste management company Posiva and the radiation and nuclear safety authority STUK. Between them is the Safety Case, a repository safety assessment report that is a precondition for the government-approved construction license for Onkalo. The Safety Case becomes a main topic for the ethnographic analysis, offering a window into the far-future Finland that is produced in the myriad of technical reports that constitute it. The first empirical chapter examines a key element of the Safety Case: analogy studies, where analogies of various sorts from Finnish prehistory to modern-day glaciers in Greenland are drawn upon to anticipate future Finland. The second chapter moves into computer modelling
Ialenti,Vincent(2020)深度时间清算:未来思维如何帮助地球
一些能源政策选择对未来几十年都有影响。有些选择会在几个世纪、数万年或数十万年后产生影响。目前的规划者如何知道这些影响会是什么?Vincent Ialenti的《深度时间计算:未来思维如何帮助地球现在》一书考察了预测核废料储存中未来地质、水文和生态事件的专业人士。他的现场位于芬兰:这个国家以其核能计划而闻名,也是世界上第一个预期的深层地质核废料库Onkalo的所在地。这是一种将乏核燃料储存在芬兰基岩深处的处置方案。Onkalo将于2023-2024年开放,并在未来数十万年内控制核废料。深度时间计算研究深度时间:涉及地质事件的时间尺度远大于人类时间尺度。Ialenti主要不是为学术论文写作,而是为受过教育的专家和公众写作。他介绍了核废料处理,以促进学习,即“深度时间计算”。Ialenti认为,在社会面临双重危机的时刻,这些计算至关重要:生态危机和公认的知识危机,即“专业知识通缩”,这表明人们普遍不信任专家权威和知识。芬兰的核管理专业知识及其长远眼光“世界上最有远见的专家”(第xiv页)为这种情况提供了新的见解。这本书经验丰富,包括持续32个月(2012-2014年)的实地调查,涵盖了从核废料管理及其公共监管到研究、公司、非政府组织和政治家的121名线人。作为一名人类学家,Ialenti采用了著名的格言“追随演员”,并将他的线人视为“有梦想、爱好、焦虑、希望、挫折、怪癖、激情、流言蜚语、遗憾、善良和意见的人”(第20页)。他的观察范围从办公室和研讨会到空闲时间的活动(包括家庭避暑别墅)。教育内容包括形成深度时间思维实用工具包的练习。对于任何学术或科普工作来说,材料的数量之多都是令人印象深刻的。这本书的引言重点介绍了关键参与者:芬兰核废料管理公司Posiva和辐射与核安全局STUK。其中包括安全案例,这是一份储存库安全评估报告,是政府批准Onkalo施工许可证的先决条件。安全案例成为人种学分析的一个主要主题,为了解芬兰的遥远未来提供了一扇窗户,而这扇窗户是由无数的技术报告组成的。第一章实证研究了安全案例的一个关键要素:类比研究,从芬兰史前到格陵兰现代冰川的各种类比都被用来预测未来的芬兰。第二章进入计算机建模
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science and Technology Studies
Science and Technology Studies HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
23
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信