Uncertainty in Higher Education: Being an Academic in the New World Order during and after the Covid-19 Pandemic

IF 0.1 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ismail Erol, Semih Çayak
{"title":"Uncertainty in Higher Education: Being an Academic in the New World Order during and after the Covid-19 Pandemic","authors":"Ismail Erol, Semih Çayak","doi":"10.2399/yod.21.843580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to examine the views of academics on the uncertainty situations created by the Covid-19 pandemic in higher education institutions. Applying the phenomenological method, one of the qualitative research methods, semi-structured interviews were conducted with academics working at a state university in Turkey. The study group was formed using the maximum variation sampling method, one of the purposeful sampling methods. The data were subjected to content analysis. Similar codes that emerged in the content analysis were grouped under the same themes. The findings show that academics have experienced some educational and bureaucratic uncertainties during the pandemic, most of which are related to remote teaching, course planning, and applied training. In addition, the findings show that the main sources of uncertainty are the process of adaptation to the pandemic, and the Council of Higher Education. The expectation that was highlighted the strongest by the academic staff are being transparent and engaging in joint production activities in combating uncertainty in higher education. The most important expectation from the administrators is asking for and valuing the stakeholder opinions and ideas. The main suggestions offered by the academics regarding the elimination of the uncertainties that arise during the pandemic were taking a joint decision, planned process management, and authorizing the academics.","PeriodicalId":42261,"journal":{"name":"Yuksekogretim Dergisi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yuksekogretim Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.21.843580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the views of academics on the uncertainty situations created by the Covid-19 pandemic in higher education institutions. Applying the phenomenological method, one of the qualitative research methods, semi-structured interviews were conducted with academics working at a state university in Turkey. The study group was formed using the maximum variation sampling method, one of the purposeful sampling methods. The data were subjected to content analysis. Similar codes that emerged in the content analysis were grouped under the same themes. The findings show that academics have experienced some educational and bureaucratic uncertainties during the pandemic, most of which are related to remote teaching, course planning, and applied training. In addition, the findings show that the main sources of uncertainty are the process of adaptation to the pandemic, and the Council of Higher Education. The expectation that was highlighted the strongest by the academic staff are being transparent and engaging in joint production activities in combating uncertainty in higher education. The most important expectation from the administrators is asking for and valuing the stakeholder opinions and ideas. The main suggestions offered by the academics regarding the elimination of the uncertainties that arise during the pandemic were taking a joint decision, planned process management, and authorizing the academics.
高等教育的不确定性:在新冠肺炎大流行期间和之后成为新世界秩序中的学者
本研究的目的是研究学术界对新冠肺炎大流行在高等教育机构造成的不确定性情况的看法。采用定性研究方法之一的现象学方法,对土耳其一所州立大学的学者进行了半结构化访谈。研究组采用最大变异抽样法,这是一种有目的的抽样方法。对数据进行了内容分析。内容分析中出现的类似代码被归为相同的主题。研究结果表明,在疫情期间,学者们经历了一些教育和官僚方面的不确定性,其中大部分与远程教学、课程规划和应用培训有关。此外,研究结果表明,不确定性的主要来源是适应疫情的过程和高等教育委员会。学术人员最强烈的期望是保持透明,并参与联合制作活动,以应对高等教育的不确定性。管理者最重要的期望是征求和重视利益相关者的意见和想法。学者们就消除疫情期间出现的不确定性提出的主要建议是做出联合决定、计划流程管理和授权学者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Yuksekogretim Dergisi
Yuksekogretim Dergisi EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
16.70%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信