{"title":"Ecofeminism revisited: critical insights on contemporary environmental governance","authors":"Emma Foster","doi":"10.1177/1464700120988639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Echoing other articles in this special issue, this article re-evaluates a collection of feminist works that fell out of fashion as a consequence of academic feminism embracing poststructuralist and postmodernist trends. In line with fellow contributors, the article critically reflects upon the unsympathetic reading of feminisms considered to be essentialising and universalistic, in order to re-evaluate, in my case, ecofeminism. As an introduction, I reflect on my own perhaps unfair rejection of ecofeminism as a doctoral researcher and early career academic who, in critiquing 1990s international environmental governance, sought to problematise the essentialist premise on which it appeared to be based. The article thereafter challenges this well-rehearsed critique by carefully revisiting a sample of ecofeminist work produced between the late 1970s and the early 1990s. In an effort to avoid wholesale abandonment of the wealth of feminist theory often labelled as second wave, or the rendering of feminisms of the past as redundant as feminist theory changes over time, this article re-reads the work of ecofeminists, such as Starhawk, Susan Griffin and Vandana Shiva, to demonstrate their contemporary relevance. In so doing, the article argues that a contemporary re-reading of ecofeminism offers insights allowing for a radical rethinking of contemporary environmental governance.","PeriodicalId":47281,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Theory","volume":"22 1","pages":"190 - 205"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1464700120988639","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Theory","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700120988639","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
Echoing other articles in this special issue, this article re-evaluates a collection of feminist works that fell out of fashion as a consequence of academic feminism embracing poststructuralist and postmodernist trends. In line with fellow contributors, the article critically reflects upon the unsympathetic reading of feminisms considered to be essentialising and universalistic, in order to re-evaluate, in my case, ecofeminism. As an introduction, I reflect on my own perhaps unfair rejection of ecofeminism as a doctoral researcher and early career academic who, in critiquing 1990s international environmental governance, sought to problematise the essentialist premise on which it appeared to be based. The article thereafter challenges this well-rehearsed critique by carefully revisiting a sample of ecofeminist work produced between the late 1970s and the early 1990s. In an effort to avoid wholesale abandonment of the wealth of feminist theory often labelled as second wave, or the rendering of feminisms of the past as redundant as feminist theory changes over time, this article re-reads the work of ecofeminists, such as Starhawk, Susan Griffin and Vandana Shiva, to demonstrate their contemporary relevance. In so doing, the article argues that a contemporary re-reading of ecofeminism offers insights allowing for a radical rethinking of contemporary environmental governance.
与本期特刊的其他文章相呼应,这篇文章重新评估了一批由于学术女权主义拥抱后结构主义和后现代主义趋势而过时的女权主义作品。与其他撰稿人一样,这篇文章批判性地反思了对被认为是本质化和普遍主义的女权主义的无情解读,以便重新评估生态女权主义,就我而言。作为介绍,我反思了自己作为一名博士研究员和早期职业学者对生态女权主义的不公平拒绝,我在批评20世纪90年代的国际环境治理时,试图对其似乎基于的本质主义前提提出问题。此后,这篇文章通过仔细回顾20世纪70年代末至90年代初产生的生态女权主义作品样本,挑战了这种精心排练的批评。为了避免大规模抛弃女权主义理论的财富,这些理论通常被称为第二波,或者将过去的女权主义渲染为多余的,因为女权主义理论随着时间的推移而变化,本文重新阅读生态女权主义者的作品,如Starhawk, Susan Griffin和Vandana Shiva,以展示他们的当代相关性。在这样做的过程中,文章认为,当代对生态女权主义的重新解读提供了允许对当代环境治理进行激进反思的见解。
期刊介绍:
Feminist Theory is an international interdisciplinary journal that provides a forum for critical analysis and constructive debate within feminism. Theoretical Pluralism / Feminist Diversity Feminist Theory is genuinely interdisciplinary and reflects the diversity of feminism, incorporating perspectives from across the broad spectrum of the humanities and social sciences and the full range of feminist political and theoretical stances.