Wittgenstein’s Problem of Rule-Following and Legal Philosophy Studies

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY

Epistemology & Philosophy of Science-Epistemologiya i Filosofiya Nauki Pub Date : 2020-08-03 DOI:10.5840/eps202057337

V. Ogleznev

引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article presents an analysis of K.A. Rodin’s argument that after publishing of Peter Winch’s book “The Idea of Social Science” (1958) the discussions of rule-following problem concerning to social epistemology and the methodology of social studies have not had tangible results. It is shown by the example of modern legal studies that this conclusion is not valid. On the contrary, Wittgenstein’s problem of rule-following and the very idea of rule-shaped activity have proved to have a great importance for an analytical legal philosophy and turned into an independent subject of study.

查看原文本刊更多论文

维特根斯坦的规则遵循问题与法哲学研究

本文分析了K.A.罗丹的论点，即在彼得·温奇的《社会科学的思想》（1958）一书出版后，关于社会认识论和社会研究方法论的规则遵循问题的讨论没有取得切实的成果。现代法学研究的实例表明，这一结论是不成立的。相反，维特根斯坦的规则遵循问题和规则形活动的思想对分析法哲学具有重要意义，并成为一个独立的研究课题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Epistemology & Philosophy of Science-Epistemologiya i Filosofiya Nauki PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

25.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Epistemology & Philosophy of Science is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal established in 2004 by the Institute of Philosophy (Russian Academy of Sciences). It is devoted to the themes in modern epistemology, philosophy of science, philosophy of language, and philosophy of mind. The journal supports the policy of interdisciplinarity. It’s based on the belief that the comprehensive analysis of cultural phenomena couldn’t be completed without focusing on the problems of cognition. The epistemological analysis, however, needs the research results from human, social and natural sciences. Sections of the journal: 1.Editorial 2.Panel Discussion 3.Epistemology and Cognition 4.Language and Mind 5.Vista 6.Case Studies -Science Studies 7.Interdisciplinary Studies 8.Archive 9.Symposium 10.Book Reviews