Intercropping of orchardgrass and alfalfa improves soil fertility, forage yield, feeding values and land use efficiency while limiting ruminal greenhouse gas emissions

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Zhulin Xue, Yunling Wang, Elizabeth Palmer, Yingjun Zhang
{"title":"Intercropping of orchardgrass and alfalfa improves soil fertility, forage yield, feeding values and land use efficiency while limiting ruminal greenhouse gas emissions","authors":"Zhulin Xue,&nbsp;Yunling Wang,&nbsp;Elizabeth Palmer,&nbsp;Yingjun Zhang","doi":"10.1111/gfs.12602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Intercropping has been a globally accepted practice for forage production, however, consideration of multiple performance criteria for intercropping including forage production, feed use efficiency and ruminal greenhouse gas emissions needs to be further investigated. A two-year field study was conducted to evaluate forage dry matter (DM) yield, nutritive value, feeding values and land-use efficiency as well as ruminal carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions of intercropped orchardgrass (<i>Dactylis glomerata</i>) and alfalfa (<i>Medicago sativa</i>) sown in five intercropping ratios (100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 25:75, and 0:100, based on seed weight) and three nitrogen (N) fertilizer levels (0, 50, and 100 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>). Increasing alfalfa proportion and N fertilizer level increased soil nutrients and the two-year total DM yield. Intercropping increased both land and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) compared with monocultures. Greater NUE was obtained when N fertilizer was applied at 50 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>, compared with 100 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>. Increasing the proportion of alfalfa in intercrops increased the crude protein yield and rumen undegraded protein yield. Harvested forage intercrops were incubated with ruminal fluid for 48 h. Degraded DM yield, CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions increased with increasing alfalfa proportion in intercrops. Overall, the 75:25 of orchardgrass-alfalfa intercrops was recommended as the best compromise between high forage productivity, superior feed use efficiency and low ruminal greenhouse gas emissions through complementary effects. The results indicate that the appropriate N fertilization level would be 50 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> for acquiring higher nitrogen use efficiency and forage productivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12602","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intercropping has been a globally accepted practice for forage production, however, consideration of multiple performance criteria for intercropping including forage production, feed use efficiency and ruminal greenhouse gas emissions needs to be further investigated. A two-year field study was conducted to evaluate forage dry matter (DM) yield, nutritive value, feeding values and land-use efficiency as well as ruminal carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) emissions of intercropped orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa) sown in five intercropping ratios (100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 25:75, and 0:100, based on seed weight) and three nitrogen (N) fertilizer levels (0, 50, and 100 kg ha−1). Increasing alfalfa proportion and N fertilizer level increased soil nutrients and the two-year total DM yield. Intercropping increased both land and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) compared with monocultures. Greater NUE was obtained when N fertilizer was applied at 50 kg ha−1, compared with 100 kg ha−1. Increasing the proportion of alfalfa in intercrops increased the crude protein yield and rumen undegraded protein yield. Harvested forage intercrops were incubated with ruminal fluid for 48 h. Degraded DM yield, CO2 and CH4 emissions increased with increasing alfalfa proportion in intercrops. Overall, the 75:25 of orchardgrass-alfalfa intercrops was recommended as the best compromise between high forage productivity, superior feed use efficiency and low ruminal greenhouse gas emissions through complementary effects. The results indicate that the appropriate N fertilization level would be 50 kg ha−1 for acquiring higher nitrogen use efficiency and forage productivity.

果园草和苜蓿间作提高了土壤肥力、牧草产量、饲养价值和土地利用效率,同时限制了瘤胃温室气体排放
间作已成为全球公认的饲料生产方式,但间作的多种性能标准,包括饲料产量、饲料利用效率和瘤胃温室气体排放,需要进一步研究。通过为期2年的田间试验,评价了5种间作比例(按种子重分别为100:0、75:25、50:50、25:75和0:100)和3种氮肥水平(0、50和100 kg ha−1)下果园草和苜蓿的牧草干物质(DM)产量、营养价值、饲用价值和土地利用效率,以及瘤胃二氧化碳(CO2)和甲烷(CH4)排放。增加苜蓿比例和氮肥水平可提高土壤养分和2年DM总产量。与单作相比,间作提高了土地利用效率和氮素利用率。施氮量为50 kg ha - 1时,氮肥利用率高于100 kg ha - 1。增加间作中苜蓿的比例可提高粗蛋白质产量和瘤胃未降解蛋白质产量。将收获的草料间作与瘤胃液孵育48 h。随着间作苜蓿比例的增加,降解的DM产量、CO2和CH4排放量增加。综上所述,果园-紫花苜蓿间作比例为75:25,是通过互补效应实现高饲料生产效率、高饲料利用效率和低瘤胃温室气体排放的最佳组合。结果表明,为获得较高的氮素利用效率和饲料生产力,施氮量为50 kg ha - 1为宜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Grass and Forage Science
Grass and Forage Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信