Using Evidence in Policies Addressing Rural NEETs: Common Patterns and Differences in Various EU Countries

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES
Claudia Petrescu, Adriano Mauro Ellena, Maria Fernandes‐Jesus, E. Marta
{"title":"Using Evidence in Policies Addressing Rural NEETs: Common Patterns and Differences in Various EU Countries","authors":"Claudia Petrescu, Adriano Mauro Ellena, Maria Fernandes‐Jesus, E. Marta","doi":"10.1177/0044118X211056361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using the policy narrative framework, this article examines the pathways through which the development of policies (related to rural/small towns young NEETs in various EU countries) are based on evidence. To do this, we consider the Youth Guarantee (YG), an EU program (2014–2020) developed in several member countries with the aim of socioprofessional inclusion of NEETs (young people aged 15–24 that are not in employment, education, or training). It examines how evidence is used for national policy-making and is taken into account by stakeholders. This study involves documentary analysis of YG in three European countries: namely, Romania, Italy, and Portugal. In addition, it involves 27 interviews with policy-makers and NGO leaders. The results show a predominantly statistical use of data exclusively managed by public institutions. Therefore, we emphasize the importance of consulting evidence from academia and NGOs to improve this policy.","PeriodicalId":47959,"journal":{"name":"Youth & Society","volume":"54 1","pages":"69S - 88S"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Youth & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X211056361","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Using the policy narrative framework, this article examines the pathways through which the development of policies (related to rural/small towns young NEETs in various EU countries) are based on evidence. To do this, we consider the Youth Guarantee (YG), an EU program (2014–2020) developed in several member countries with the aim of socioprofessional inclusion of NEETs (young people aged 15–24 that are not in employment, education, or training). It examines how evidence is used for national policy-making and is taken into account by stakeholders. This study involves documentary analysis of YG in three European countries: namely, Romania, Italy, and Portugal. In addition, it involves 27 interviews with policy-makers and NGO leaders. The results show a predominantly statistical use of data exclusively managed by public institutions. Therefore, we emphasize the importance of consulting evidence from academia and NGOs to improve this policy.
在解决农村啃老族问题的政策中使用证据:欧盟各国的共同模式和差异
利用政策叙述框架,本文考察了政策制定(与欧盟各国农村/小城镇年轻新能源经济专家有关)的依据。为此,我们考虑了青年保障(YG),这是一项在几个成员国制定的欧盟计划(2014-2010年),旨在将NEET(15-24岁未就业、未接受教育或培训的年轻人)纳入社会职业。它审查了如何将证据用于国家决策,并由利益攸关方加以考虑。本研究涉及对YG在罗马尼亚、意大利和葡萄牙三个欧洲国家的文献分析。此外,还对决策者和非政府组织领导人进行了27次访谈。结果显示,统计数据主要由公共机构专门管理。因此,我们强调咨询学术界和非政府组织的证据对改进这一政策的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Youth & Society
Youth & Society Multiple-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: For thirty-five years, Youth & Society has provided educators, counsellors, researchers, and policy makers with the latest research and scholarship in this dynamic field. This valuable resource examines critical contemporary issues and presents vital, practical information for studying and working with young people today. Each quarterly issue of Youth & Society features peer-reviewed articles by distinguished scholars and practitioners from a variety of disciplines and fields, including: sociology, public health, social work, education, criminology, psychology, anthropology, human services, and political science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信