The determinants of voluntary traceability standards. The case of the wine sector

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Stefanella Stranieri, Alessia Cavaliere, Alessandro Banterle
{"title":"The determinants of voluntary traceability standards. The case of the wine sector","authors":"Stefanella Stranieri,&nbsp;Alessia Cavaliere,&nbsp;Alessandro Banterle","doi":"10.1016/j.wep.2018.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this paper is to study the determinants leading firms to choose among different kinds of voluntary traceability standards in the wine sector. To achieve this goal, we referred both to individual and institutional-level determinants, which are identified to play an important role in the literature related to the implementation of quality and safety standards. In specific, we referred to two theoretical approaches to better understand the industry behaviour towards the adoption of voluntary traceability, i.e. the Theory of Reasoned Action and the Institutional Theory. We developed a vis-à-vis survey through a questionnaire on a sample of Italian wineries approached during the most important Italian wine exhibitions in 2016. The results suggest that when wineries show positive cognitive beliefs towards voluntary traceability standards, they will probably implement complex traceability systems, which require high investments and efforts for their management. On the contrary, when the institutional environment plays a key role in the perception of wine processors, a simple and flexible traceability system seems to be preferred.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38081,"journal":{"name":"Wine Economics and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wep.2018.02.001","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wine Economics and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212977418300073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to study the determinants leading firms to choose among different kinds of voluntary traceability standards in the wine sector. To achieve this goal, we referred both to individual and institutional-level determinants, which are identified to play an important role in the literature related to the implementation of quality and safety standards. In specific, we referred to two theoretical approaches to better understand the industry behaviour towards the adoption of voluntary traceability, i.e. the Theory of Reasoned Action and the Institutional Theory. We developed a vis-à-vis survey through a questionnaire on a sample of Italian wineries approached during the most important Italian wine exhibitions in 2016. The results suggest that when wineries show positive cognitive beliefs towards voluntary traceability standards, they will probably implement complex traceability systems, which require high investments and efforts for their management. On the contrary, when the institutional environment plays a key role in the perception of wine processors, a simple and flexible traceability system seems to be preferred.

自愿可追溯性标准的决定因素。以葡萄酒行业为例
本文的目的是研究导致企业在葡萄酒行业不同种类的自愿可追溯性标准之间进行选择的决定因素。为了实现这一目标,我们参考了个人和机构层面的决定因素,这些决定因素在与质量和安全标准实施相关的文献中被认为发挥着重要作用。具体而言,我们参考了两种理论方法来更好地理解采用自愿可追溯性的行业行为,即理性行为理论和制度理论。我们通过对2016年意大利最重要的葡萄酒展览期间接触的意大利酒庄样本进行问卷调查,开发了vis-à-vis调查。结果表明,当酒庄对自愿溯源标准表现出积极的认知信念时,他们可能会实施复杂的溯源系统,这需要大量的投资和管理努力。相反,当制度环境在葡萄酒加工者的认知中起着关键作用时,一个简单灵活的可追溯系统似乎是首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wine Economics and Policy
Wine Economics and Policy Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信