Editorial

IF 3 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
A. Barr
{"title":"Editorial","authors":"A. Barr","doi":"10.1002/1873-3468.13869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We are delighted to publish Part 2 of our Special Issue on cell cycle control. Here, we present four reviews that, together with Part 1, give a comprehensive overview of our current understanding of the cell cycle, as well as the methods employed to study it, the roles of cell cycle proteins beyond orchestrating cell division, and some of the key outstanding questions. Part 1 provided an overview of the common principles governing the transitions between the cell cycle phases [1], the role of metabolism in quiescence–proliferation transitions [2] and the relationship between the speed of the cell cycle and cell fate [3]. In addition, Part 1 covered how cells prepare for DNA replication during G1 and how this impacts proper DNA replication in S-phase [4], how cells control entry into mitosis [5] and, once in mitosis, how they achieve proper chromosome alignment and equal segregation of chromosomes into two daughter cells [6], and how mitotic exit is controlled to ensure appropriate temporal and spatial organisation [7]. A comparison between the function of CDKs in mitosis and meiosis concluded Part 1 [8]. Part 2 begins with a review from Silvia Santos’ Lab that covers how embryonic cell cycles remodel in order to give rise to somatic cell cycles, including the, often forgotten, differences between human and mouse embryonic stem cells [9]. Adaptation of embryonic cell cycles to somatic cell cycles requires extensive changes in the regulation of cyclins, CDKs and the anaphasepromoting complex/cyclosome, as well as the introduction of cell cycle checkpoints. A notable example of the checkpoints that are introduced en route to somatic cell cycles is the restriction point. The restriction point is defined as the point in the cell cycle beyond which cells no longer require input from mitogens to complete cell division. In a review from our laboratory, we discuss and analyse recent data to understand the control of the restriction point in determining proliferation–quiescence decisions in cells [10]. The restriction point was originally defined over 40 years ago, yet its position within the cell cycle and the molecular basis for this decision are still active topics of investigation. From proliferation–quiescence decisions, we then move onto proliferation–differentiation decisions, in a review from the Kimata and Aradhya laboratories [11]. Much has been written in this review series about the roles of cyclin:CDK complexes in driving the cell cycle. However, here the focus is on the cell cycle-independent roles of cyclins, CDKs and their inhibitors, in particular in their contributions to cell differentiation. It is critical to remember these non-cell cycle functions, particularly when analysing the phenotypes of mice where the function of these proteins has been disrupted. Finally, Anna Eastman and Shangqin Guo have provided a second review for this series, and this one focussed on the methods available to study and probe the cell cycle [12]. We imagine that this will be of particular interest to researchers new to the field but also serves as a very useful reminder to experts as to the strengths and weaknesses of our assays. We anticipate that readers new to the cell cycle field and also aficionados of cell cycle control will enjoy this special issue. Hopefully, these reviews, written by leaders in cell cycle research, will spark new questions and ideas to keep expanding our understanding of the phenomenal and beautiful process that is cell division.","PeriodicalId":50454,"journal":{"name":"FEBS Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/1873-3468.13869","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FEBS Letters","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13869","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We are delighted to publish Part 2 of our Special Issue on cell cycle control. Here, we present four reviews that, together with Part 1, give a comprehensive overview of our current understanding of the cell cycle, as well as the methods employed to study it, the roles of cell cycle proteins beyond orchestrating cell division, and some of the key outstanding questions. Part 1 provided an overview of the common principles governing the transitions between the cell cycle phases [1], the role of metabolism in quiescence–proliferation transitions [2] and the relationship between the speed of the cell cycle and cell fate [3]. In addition, Part 1 covered how cells prepare for DNA replication during G1 and how this impacts proper DNA replication in S-phase [4], how cells control entry into mitosis [5] and, once in mitosis, how they achieve proper chromosome alignment and equal segregation of chromosomes into two daughter cells [6], and how mitotic exit is controlled to ensure appropriate temporal and spatial organisation [7]. A comparison between the function of CDKs in mitosis and meiosis concluded Part 1 [8]. Part 2 begins with a review from Silvia Santos’ Lab that covers how embryonic cell cycles remodel in order to give rise to somatic cell cycles, including the, often forgotten, differences between human and mouse embryonic stem cells [9]. Adaptation of embryonic cell cycles to somatic cell cycles requires extensive changes in the regulation of cyclins, CDKs and the anaphasepromoting complex/cyclosome, as well as the introduction of cell cycle checkpoints. A notable example of the checkpoints that are introduced en route to somatic cell cycles is the restriction point. The restriction point is defined as the point in the cell cycle beyond which cells no longer require input from mitogens to complete cell division. In a review from our laboratory, we discuss and analyse recent data to understand the control of the restriction point in determining proliferation–quiescence decisions in cells [10]. The restriction point was originally defined over 40 years ago, yet its position within the cell cycle and the molecular basis for this decision are still active topics of investigation. From proliferation–quiescence decisions, we then move onto proliferation–differentiation decisions, in a review from the Kimata and Aradhya laboratories [11]. Much has been written in this review series about the roles of cyclin:CDK complexes in driving the cell cycle. However, here the focus is on the cell cycle-independent roles of cyclins, CDKs and their inhibitors, in particular in their contributions to cell differentiation. It is critical to remember these non-cell cycle functions, particularly when analysing the phenotypes of mice where the function of these proteins has been disrupted. Finally, Anna Eastman and Shangqin Guo have provided a second review for this series, and this one focussed on the methods available to study and probe the cell cycle [12]. We imagine that this will be of particular interest to researchers new to the field but also serves as a very useful reminder to experts as to the strengths and weaknesses of our assays. We anticipate that readers new to the cell cycle field and also aficionados of cell cycle control will enjoy this special issue. Hopefully, these reviews, written by leaders in cell cycle research, will spark new questions and ideas to keep expanding our understanding of the phenomenal and beautiful process that is cell division.
社论
我们很高兴出版关于细胞周期控制的特刊第2部分。在这里,我们提供了四篇综述,与第1部分一起,全面概述了我们目前对细胞周期的理解,以及研究细胞周期的方法,细胞周期蛋白在协调细胞分裂之外的作用,以及一些关键的未决问题。第1部分概述了控制细胞周期阶段之间转变的常见原理[1]、代谢在静止-增殖转变中的作用[2]以及细胞周期速度和细胞命运之间的关系[3]。此外,第1部分涵盖了细胞如何在G1期为DNA复制做准备,以及这如何影响S期的正确DNA复制[4],细胞如何控制进入有丝分裂[5],以及一旦进入有丝裂,它们如何实现正确的染色体排列和染色体平等分离为两个子细胞[6],以及如何控制有丝分裂退出以确保适当的时间和空间组织[7]。CDKs在有丝分裂和减数分裂中的功能比较总结了第1部分[8]。第2部分从Silvia Santos实验室的一篇综述开始,该综述涵盖了胚胎细胞周期如何重塑以产生体细胞周期,包括人类和小鼠胚胎干细胞之间经常被遗忘的差异[9]。胚胎细胞周期对体细胞周期的适应需要细胞周期蛋白、CDKs和促后期复合体/环体的调节发生广泛变化,并引入细胞周期检查点。在体细胞周期过程中引入的检查点的一个显著例子是限制点。限制点被定义为细胞周期中的一个点,超过该点,细胞不再需要有丝分裂原的输入来完成细胞分裂。在我们实验室的一篇综述中,我们讨论和分析了最近的数据,以了解限制点在决定细胞增殖-静止决定中的控制[10]。限制点最初是在40多年前定义的,但它在细胞周期中的位置和这一决定的分子基础仍然是研究的热点。在Kimata和Aradhya实验室的一篇综述中,我们从增殖-静止决策转向增殖-分化决策[11]。关于细胞周期蛋白:CDK复合物在驱动细胞周期中的作用,这篇综述系列文章已经写了很多。然而,这里的重点是细胞周期蛋白、CDKs及其抑制剂的细胞周期独立性作用,特别是它们对细胞分化的贡献。记住这些非细胞周期功能至关重要,尤其是在分析这些蛋白质功能被破坏的小鼠表型时。最后,Anna Eastman和Shangqin Guo为该系列提供了第二篇综述,这篇综述侧重于研究和探测细胞周期的可用方法[12]。我们认为,这将引起新进入该领域的研究人员的特别兴趣,但也可以非常有用地提醒专家我们的检测方法的优势和劣势。我们预计,细胞周期领域的新读者以及细胞周期控制的爱好者将喜欢这期特刊。希望这些由细胞周期研究领导者撰写的综述将引发新的问题和想法,以不断扩大我们对细胞分裂这一现象和美丽过程的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FEBS Letters
FEBS Letters 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
303
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: FEBS Letters is one of the world''s leading journals in molecular biology and is renowned both for its quality of content and speed of production. Bringing together the most important developments in the molecular biosciences, FEBS Letters provides an international forum for Minireviews, Research Letters and Hypotheses that merit urgent publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信