Post‐COVID‐19 acute cognitive syndromes

IF 1.3 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
{"title":"Post‐COVID‐19 acute cognitive syndromes","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/pnp.731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Post-COVID-19 acute cognitive syndromes Further to Gaber & Eltemamy’s report of post-COVID-19 aphantasia,1 I suggest that other apparently acute cognitive syndromes are likely to be seen post-COVID-19. A previously healthy 49-year-old woman was referred with a complaint of forgetting following confirmed COVID-19 infection 9 months earlier characterised by cough and fever but not requiring hospitalisation. Prior to this acute illness she reported her memory to be excellent, even for remote details that other family members could not recall. Because of her symptoms, she could no longer pursue her occupation of teaching. Cognitive testing and structural brain imaging disclosed no cause for her symptoms. Inconsistency between self-reported and objective performance was in keeping with a proposed operational definition of functional cognitive disorder (FCD).2 This clinical observation, which I suspect is far from unique, is problematic for metacognitive models of FCD,3 as are other instances of acute onset FCD, such as the dissociative amnesia type,4 which imply sudden rather than gradual change in synaptic neuromodulation. These entities share a clear stressful precipitating event, physical or psychological, the severity of which may be disproportionate to the subsequent cognitive symptoms. The mechanism(s) that underpin acute post-COVID-19 cognitive syndromes such as FCD remain to be determined but might include neurovascular and immunological dysfunction.","PeriodicalId":43913,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pnp.731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Post-COVID-19 acute cognitive syndromes Further to Gaber & Eltemamy’s report of post-COVID-19 aphantasia,1 I suggest that other apparently acute cognitive syndromes are likely to be seen post-COVID-19. A previously healthy 49-year-old woman was referred with a complaint of forgetting following confirmed COVID-19 infection 9 months earlier characterised by cough and fever but not requiring hospitalisation. Prior to this acute illness she reported her memory to be excellent, even for remote details that other family members could not recall. Because of her symptoms, she could no longer pursue her occupation of teaching. Cognitive testing and structural brain imaging disclosed no cause for her symptoms. Inconsistency between self-reported and objective performance was in keeping with a proposed operational definition of functional cognitive disorder (FCD).2 This clinical observation, which I suspect is far from unique, is problematic for metacognitive models of FCD,3 as are other instances of acute onset FCD, such as the dissociative amnesia type,4 which imply sudden rather than gradual change in synaptic neuromodulation. These entities share a clear stressful precipitating event, physical or psychological, the severity of which may be disproportionate to the subsequent cognitive symptoms. The mechanism(s) that underpin acute post-COVID-19 cognitive syndromes such as FCD remain to be determined but might include neurovascular and immunological dysfunction.
后COVID - 19急性认知综合征
根据Gaber & Eltemamy关于covid -19后幻觉的报告,我建议在covid -19后可能会出现其他明显的急性认知综合征。一名先前健康的49岁妇女在9个月前确诊的COVID-19感染后被转诊,其症状是咳嗽和发烧,但不需要住院。在此急性疾病之前,她报告说她的记忆力很好,甚至是其他家庭成员不记得的遥远细节。由于她的症状,她不能再从事她的教学工作。认知测试和脑结构成像显示她的症状没有原因。自我报告和客观表现之间的不一致符合功能性认知障碍(FCD)的操作性定义这一临床观察,我怀疑远不是唯一的,对于FCD的元认知模型来说是有问题的,3就像其他急性发作的FCD一样,比如解离性健忘症,4意味着突触神经调节的突然而不是渐进的变化。这些实体都有一个明显的生理或心理应激性突发事件,其严重程度可能与随后的认知症状不成比例。支持急性covid -19后认知综合征(如FCD)的机制仍有待确定,但可能包括神经血管和免疫功能障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry is published nine times a year, and is a journal for specialists in secondary care, GPs with an interest in neurology and psychiatry, community psychiatric nurses and other specialist healthcare professionals. Articles cover management, news updates and opinion in all areas of neurology and psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信