TahlÄ«l MuhtawÄ wa MustawÄ As'ilat IkhtibÄrÄt Al-Lughah Al ‘Arabiyah Li ImtihÄn Al Madrasah 'alÄ al Ma'ÄyÄ«r Al Wathaniyyah 'alÄ IthÄr Al Manhaj 2013
{"title":"TahlÄ«l MuhtawÄ wa MustawÄ As'ilat IkhtibÄrÄt Al-Lughah Al ‘Arabiyah Li ImtihÄn Al Madrasah 'alÄ al Ma'ÄyÄ«r Al Wathaniyyah 'alÄ IthÄr Al Manhaj 2013","authors":"M. Natsir","doi":"10.28918/alsinatuna.v5i2.2574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nThe 2013 curriculum demands a paradigm shift in learning, process, and evaluation, including in HOTS, MOTS, LOTS-based assessments. Using an evaluative research design, this study aims to analyze the Arabic language test items in the UAMBN Madrasah Aliyah under LP. Ma'arif Kabupaten Jepara for the Academic Year 2018/2019. The analysis includes the design and approach used in preparing the test, the content (materials) of the test, and the categorization of the quality level of the test items in the 2013 Curriculum, i.e. HOTS, MOTS, or LOTS. The results showed that: first, the approach used in preparing the test was an integrative approach for multiple-choice test questions and a discrete-point test approach for essay test questions. Second, the content of the test included Arab and Indonesian culture and civilization, Muslim figures, language level, language rules, and sentence structure. Third, Arabic language test questions in UAMBN covered HOTS, MOTS, and LOTS questions. In the multiple-choice questions, 11 questions (27.5%) were included in the LOTS category, 10 questions (25%) in the MOTS category, and 19 questions (47.5%) in the HOTS category. Meanwhile, the essay questions, which presented 4 questions (80%) for the HOTS category and 1 question (20%) for the MOTS category, were considered less proportional. Overall, the format for the Arabic test in the UAMBN Madrasah Aliyah has been proportional because it has accommodated questions with the HOTS, MOTS, and LOTS categories. \n ","PeriodicalId":55722,"journal":{"name":"Alsinatuna","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alsinatuna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28918/alsinatuna.v5i2.2574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract
The 2013 curriculum demands a paradigm shift in learning, process, and evaluation, including in HOTS, MOTS, LOTS-based assessments. Using an evaluative research design, this study aims to analyze the Arabic language test items in the UAMBN Madrasah Aliyah under LP. Ma'arif Kabupaten Jepara for the Academic Year 2018/2019. The analysis includes the design and approach used in preparing the test, the content (materials) of the test, and the categorization of the quality level of the test items in the 2013 Curriculum, i.e. HOTS, MOTS, or LOTS. The results showed that: first, the approach used in preparing the test was an integrative approach for multiple-choice test questions and a discrete-point test approach for essay test questions. Second, the content of the test included Arab and Indonesian culture and civilization, Muslim figures, language level, language rules, and sentence structure. Third, Arabic language test questions in UAMBN covered HOTS, MOTS, and LOTS questions. In the multiple-choice questions, 11 questions (27.5%) were included in the LOTS category, 10 questions (25%) in the MOTS category, and 19 questions (47.5%) in the HOTS category. Meanwhile, the essay questions, which presented 4 questions (80%) for the HOTS category and 1 question (20%) for the MOTS category, were considered less proportional. Overall, the format for the Arabic test in the UAMBN Madrasah Aliyah has been proportional because it has accommodated questions with the HOTS, MOTS, and LOTS categories.
Tahl Å l Muhtaw Å Wa Mustaw Å As'ilat Ikhtib Å R Å T Al Loughah Al †˜ Arabiyah Li Imtih Å N Al Madrasah'al Å Al Ma 'Å Y ł r Al Wathaniyyah'al ł Ith Å R Al Manhaj 2013
摘要2013年的课程要求在学习、过程和评估方面进行范式转变,包括基于HOTS、MOTS和LOTS的评估。采用评价研究设计,本研究旨在分析LP下UAMBN宗教学校的阿拉伯语测试项目。Ma'arif Kabupaten Jepara 2018/2019学年。分析包括准备考试时使用的设计和方法、考试内容(材料)以及2013年课程中考试项目(即HOTS、MOTS或LOTS)的质量水平分类。结果表明:第一,选择题的备考方法是综合性的,作文题的备试方法是离散点测试。其次,测试内容包括阿拉伯和印尼文化和文明、穆斯林人物、语言水平、语言规则和句子结构。UAMBN的阿拉伯语测试题包括HOTS、MOTS和LOTS。在多项选择题中,LOTS类有11道题(27.5%),MOTS类有10道题(25%),HOTS类有19道题(47.5%)。同时,论文问题被认为比例较低,其中HOTS类别有4个问题(80%),MOTS类别有1个问题(20%)。总的来说,UAMBN Madrasah Aliyah阿拉伯语考试的形式是成比例的,因为它包含了HOTS、MOTS和LOTS类别的问题。