Building a risky-safe-space: Using reflective pedagogies and values to support writing development in work based learning

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
V. Boyd, Colin Wilson, C. Smith
{"title":"Building a risky-safe-space: Using reflective pedagogies and values to support writing development in work based learning","authors":"V. Boyd, Colin Wilson, C. Smith","doi":"10.53761/1.20.4.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concepts of ‘graduateness’ and graduate attributes became contested terrain before COVID-19 destabilised even the most assured of shared learning constructions. Indeed, for those of us immersed in the delivery of work-based learning (WBL), this has long been the case. Promotion of reductive notions of ‘skills’ acquisition to comply neatly with an employability agenda holds little relevance for those students already engaged in full time careers, and with a wealth of professional experience. What can hold influence and interest, however, is the opportunity to engage in meaningful, agentic, professionally-aligned reflective practices as a scaffolded route to promoting self-awareness and developing confidence in mapping competences from the professional domain to the academic (and vice versa). This paper shares an account of taking an embedded approach to supporting the development of academic literacies amongst work-based learners in one UK HEI. In particular, it will consider the use of reflective pedagogical tools and values in supporting work-based learners to become confident and adaptable writers. Discussion considers how work-based pedagogies and approaches may have far-reaching relevance in a post-pandemic landscape, where reskilling and professional agility are likely to become more prolific aspects of education and work. Writing itself is framed as an integrated communication practice that encompasses literature retrieval, reading, evaluation, synthesis and articulation of argument. The paper will describe pre-pandemic academic support activities and share qualitative survey data in which students consider their confidence as both professional and academic writers. It concludes with consideration of how some of the approaches outlined may have relevance for the wider academic community.","PeriodicalId":45764,"journal":{"name":"Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.4.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concepts of ‘graduateness’ and graduate attributes became contested terrain before COVID-19 destabilised even the most assured of shared learning constructions. Indeed, for those of us immersed in the delivery of work-based learning (WBL), this has long been the case. Promotion of reductive notions of ‘skills’ acquisition to comply neatly with an employability agenda holds little relevance for those students already engaged in full time careers, and with a wealth of professional experience. What can hold influence and interest, however, is the opportunity to engage in meaningful, agentic, professionally-aligned reflective practices as a scaffolded route to promoting self-awareness and developing confidence in mapping competences from the professional domain to the academic (and vice versa). This paper shares an account of taking an embedded approach to supporting the development of academic literacies amongst work-based learners in one UK HEI. In particular, it will consider the use of reflective pedagogical tools and values in supporting work-based learners to become confident and adaptable writers. Discussion considers how work-based pedagogies and approaches may have far-reaching relevance in a post-pandemic landscape, where reskilling and professional agility are likely to become more prolific aspects of education and work. Writing itself is framed as an integrated communication practice that encompasses literature retrieval, reading, evaluation, synthesis and articulation of argument. The paper will describe pre-pandemic academic support activities and share qualitative survey data in which students consider their confidence as both professional and academic writers. It concludes with consideration of how some of the approaches outlined may have relevance for the wider academic community.
建立一个有风险的安全空间:在基于工作的学习中使用反思性教学法和价值观来支持写作发展
“毕业”和毕业生属性的概念在2019冠状病毒病之前成为争议的领域,甚至破坏了最可靠的共享学习结构。事实上,对于我们这些沉浸在以工作为基础的学习(WBL)交付中的人来说,情况早就如此了。对于那些已经从事全职工作、拥有丰富专业经验的学生来说,促进“技能”获取的简化概念,以完全符合就业能力议程,几乎没有什么意义。然而,具有影响力和兴趣的是,有机会参与有意义的、真正的、与专业相一致的反思实践,作为促进自我意识和培养从专业领域到学术领域(反之亦然)的能力映射的信心的基础途径。本文分享了在英国高等教育机构中采用嵌入式方法支持以工作为基础的学习者的学术素养发展的说明。特别是,它将考虑使用反思性教学工具和价值观,支持以工作为基础的学习者成为自信和适应能力强的作家。讨论考虑了基于工作的教学法和方法如何在大流行后的环境中具有深远的意义,在这种环境中,再培训和专业灵活性可能成为教育和工作中更多产的方面。写作本身是一种综合的交流实践,包括文献检索、阅读、评价、综合和表达论点。本文将描述流行病前的学术支持活动,并分享定性调查数据,其中学生认为他们作为专业和学术作家的信心。最后,它考虑了概述的一些方法如何与更广泛的学术界相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice
Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: The Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice aims to add significantly to the body of knowledge describing effective and innovative teaching and learning practice in higher education.The Journal is a forum for educational practitioners across a wide range of disciplines. Its purpose is to facilitate the communication of teaching and learning outcomes in a scholarly way, bridging the gap between journals covering purely academic research and articles and opinions published without peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信