Correlación diagnóstica de la escala RIPASA en pacientes intervenidos quirúrgicamente por apendicitis aguda

R. A. Gasque, Walter A. Moreno, Gabriel E Vigilante
{"title":"Correlación diagnóstica de la escala RIPASA en pacientes intervenidos quirúrgicamente por apendicitis aguda","authors":"R. A. Gasque, Walter A. Moreno, Gabriel E Vigilante","doi":"10.25132/raac.v112.n2.1452.es","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Acute appendicitis (AA) is the most common surgical emergency worldwide. Its correct and early diagnosis is essential to avoid unnecessary surgeries and complications associated with its natural history. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the RIPASA score in patients with suspected AA. Material and methods: This analytical, cross-sectional, observational and retrospective study included appendectomy specimens of patients of both sexes > 18 years operated on with clinical diagnosis of AA between January 1 and December 31, 2017. The histopathological examination of the appendectomy specimens was considered the gold standard diagnostic test. A score of 7.5 for the RIPASA score was chosen as cut-off value. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. Results: A total of 68 appendectomies were included; 57 (83.82%) specimens were positive for acute appendicitis. Mean age was 43.32 years. The histological diagnosis of AA was present in 32 (84.21%) men and in 25 (83.33%) women. For the RIPASA score, 54 patients had a true positive result (cut-off point ≥ 7.5 and positive histology for AA) with a sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 40%, PPV of 90%, NPV of 50%, positive likelihood ratio of 1.55 and negative likelihood ratio of 0.175. Conclusion: The RIPASA score has demonstrated excellent sensitivity and specificity for the clinical diagnosis of AA in a fast, simple and non-invasive fashion.","PeriodicalId":78597,"journal":{"name":"Revista argentina de cirugia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista argentina de cirugia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25132/raac.v112.n2.1452.es","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute appendicitis (AA) is the most common surgical emergency worldwide. Its correct and early diagnosis is essential to avoid unnecessary surgeries and complications associated with its natural history. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the RIPASA score in patients with suspected AA. Material and methods: This analytical, cross-sectional, observational and retrospective study included appendectomy specimens of patients of both sexes > 18 years operated on with clinical diagnosis of AA between January 1 and December 31, 2017. The histopathological examination of the appendectomy specimens was considered the gold standard diagnostic test. A score of 7.5 for the RIPASA score was chosen as cut-off value. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. Results: A total of 68 appendectomies were included; 57 (83.82%) specimens were positive for acute appendicitis. Mean age was 43.32 years. The histological diagnosis of AA was present in 32 (84.21%) men and in 25 (83.33%) women. For the RIPASA score, 54 patients had a true positive result (cut-off point ≥ 7.5 and positive histology for AA) with a sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 40%, PPV of 90%, NPV of 50%, positive likelihood ratio of 1.55 and negative likelihood ratio of 0.175. Conclusion: The RIPASA score has demonstrated excellent sensitivity and specificity for the clinical diagnosis of AA in a fast, simple and non-invasive fashion.
急性阑尾炎手术患者RIPase评分的诊断相关性
背景:急性阑尾炎(AA)是世界范围内最常见的外科急诊。它的正确和早期诊断对于避免不必要的手术和与自然病史相关的并发症至关重要。目的:本研究的目的是确定RIASA评分对疑似AA患者的诊断敏感性和特异性。材料和方法:本分析、横断面、观察性和回顾性研究包括2017年1月1日至12月31日期间临床诊断为AA的18岁以上男女患者的阑尾切除标本。阑尾切除标本的组织病理学检查被认为是金标准诊断测试。RIASA评分选择7.5分作为截止值。计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。结果:共包括68例阑尾切除术;急性阑尾炎57例(83.82%)。平均年龄43.32岁。AA的组织学诊断在32名(84.21%)男性和25名(83.33%)女性中均有发现。对于RIASA评分,54名患者的结果为真阳性(分界点≥7.5,AA组织学阳性),敏感性为93%,特异性为40%,PPV为90%,NPV为50%,阳性似然比为1.55,阴性似然比为0.175。结论:RIASA评分对AA的临床诊断具有良好的敏感性和特异性,快速、简便、无创。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书