Keep Safe: collaborative practice development and research with people with learning disabilities

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
A. Wake, J. Davies, C. Drake, M. Rowbotham, Nicola Smith, R. Rossiter
{"title":"Keep Safe: collaborative practice development and research with people with learning disabilities","authors":"A. Wake, J. Davies, C. Drake, M. Rowbotham, Nicola Smith, R. Rossiter","doi":"10.1108/tldr-12-2019-0040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis collaborative paper (working together) describes collaborative practice development and research by and with people from the learning disabilities community. This paper aims to show some of the activities which supported the collaborative practice development and research to show and encourage others to do more collaboration. The paper format is based on a previous collaborative paper published in the Tizard Learning Disability Review (Chapman et al., 2013).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe collaborative practice development and feasibility study [1] focuses on an intervention called Keep Safe. This is an intervention for young people with learning disabilities who are 12 years and older and have shown “out-of-control” or harmful sexual behaviour.\n\n\nFindings\nThe paper gives examples of activities of the Keep Safe Advisory Group in planning, doing and thinking about Keep Safe development and feasibility. The authors list some good things and some difficulties in collaborating. They look at which parts of Frankena et al.’s (2019a) Consensus Statement on how to do inclusive research were done, which ones were not, and why.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe paper ends with some thoughts about collaborating with people from the learning disabilities community: for people with learning disabilities, practitioners and researchers.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe paper is original in its illustration of collaborative practice development and research and measuring the activities against the inclusive research consensus statement.\n","PeriodicalId":54179,"journal":{"name":"Tizard Learning Disability Review","volume":"25 1","pages":"173-180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tizard Learning Disability Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tldr-12-2019-0040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose This collaborative paper (working together) describes collaborative practice development and research by and with people from the learning disabilities community. This paper aims to show some of the activities which supported the collaborative practice development and research to show and encourage others to do more collaboration. The paper format is based on a previous collaborative paper published in the Tizard Learning Disability Review (Chapman et al., 2013). Design/methodology/approach The collaborative practice development and feasibility study [1] focuses on an intervention called Keep Safe. This is an intervention for young people with learning disabilities who are 12 years and older and have shown “out-of-control” or harmful sexual behaviour. Findings The paper gives examples of activities of the Keep Safe Advisory Group in planning, doing and thinking about Keep Safe development and feasibility. The authors list some good things and some difficulties in collaborating. They look at which parts of Frankena et al.’s (2019a) Consensus Statement on how to do inclusive research were done, which ones were not, and why. Social implications The paper ends with some thoughts about collaborating with people from the learning disabilities community: for people with learning disabilities, practitioners and researchers. Originality/value The paper is original in its illustration of collaborative practice development and research and measuring the activities against the inclusive research consensus statement.
保持安全:与有学习障碍的人合作实践开发和研究
这篇协作论文(一起工作)描述了学习障碍社区的人们的协作实践发展和研究。本文旨在展示一些支持协作实践发展和研究的活动,以展示和鼓励其他人进行更多的协作。论文格式基于之前发表在Tizard学习障碍评论(Chapman et al., 2013)上的一篇合作论文。设计/方法/方法协作实践开发和可行性研究[1]侧重于一项名为Keep Safe的干预措施。这是针对12岁及以上有学习障碍并表现出“失控”或有害性行为的年轻人的干预。本文给出了Keep Safe咨询小组在Keep Safe发展和可行性的规划、实施和思考方面的活动实例。作者列举了合作中的一些优点和一些困难。他们研究了Frankena等人(2019a)关于如何进行包容性研究的共识声明的哪些部分已经完成,哪些部分没有完成,以及为什么。社会意义本文最后提出了与学习障碍群体合作的一些想法:对学习障碍人士、从业者和研究人员。原创性/价值本文在阐述协作实践发展和研究以及根据包容性研究共识声明衡量活动方面具有独创性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tizard Learning Disability Review
Tizard Learning Disability Review EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信