To assess the rationality of pharmacotherapy of patient in clinical situations and validation of questionnaire tool used in rational pharmacotherapy

IF 0.9 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
A. Turankar, A. Shetty, N. Pramoda, V. Motghare, Chetan S. Urade
{"title":"To assess the rationality of pharmacotherapy of patient in clinical situations and validation of questionnaire tool used in rational pharmacotherapy","authors":"A. Turankar, A. Shetty, N. Pramoda, V. Motghare, Chetan S. Urade","doi":"10.18231/J.IJPP.2020.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: 1. To provide a structured tool to assess rationality based on the 10 domains of Rationality score; 2. To find out the impact of the structured tool for judging the rationality score of Pharmacotherapy in various clinical situations e.g. High, Moderate and Low rationality score.\nMethodology: A rationality scale was developed to check the coefficient of variation in each parameter of\nrationality, on a scale of 1 to 10, acronymed as R.A.T.I.O.N.A.L.I.T.Y.\nVarious clinical cases were discussed and treatment was criticised if any. These cases were then rated\naccording to the rationality scale.\nHigh Rationality - Score > 6, Average Rationality – Score > 4 and","PeriodicalId":14313,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Parallel Programming","volume":"7 1","pages":"251-255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Parallel Programming","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/J.IJPP.2020.042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: 1. To provide a structured tool to assess rationality based on the 10 domains of Rationality score; 2. To find out the impact of the structured tool for judging the rationality score of Pharmacotherapy in various clinical situations e.g. High, Moderate and Low rationality score. Methodology: A rationality scale was developed to check the coefficient of variation in each parameter of rationality, on a scale of 1 to 10, acronymed as R.A.T.I.O.N.A.L.I.T.Y. Various clinical cases were discussed and treatment was criticised if any. These cases were then rated according to the rationality scale. High Rationality - Score > 6, Average Rationality – Score > 4 and
目的评价临床情况下患者药物治疗的合理性,并验证问卷工具在合理药物治疗中的应用
目的:1。基于理性得分的10个领域,提供一个结构化的评估理性的工具;2. 探讨结构化工具在不同临床情况下(如高、中、低理性评分)对药物治疗合理性评分的影响。方法:制定了一个合理性量表来检查合理性各参数的变异系数,在1到10的范围内,缩写为r.a.t.i.o.n.a.l.i.t.y。讨论了各种临床病例,并批评了任何治疗方法。然后根据合理性量表对这些情况进行评分。高度理性-得分> 6,一般理性-得分> 4和
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Parallel Programming
International Journal of Parallel Programming 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Parallel Programming is a forum for the publication of peer-reviewed, high-quality original papers in the computer and information sciences, focusing specifically on programming aspects of parallel computing systems. Such systems are characterized by the coexistence over time of multiple coordinated activities. The journal publishes both original research and survey papers. Fields of interest include: linguistic foundations, conceptual frameworks, high-level languages, evaluation methods, implementation techniques, programming support systems, pragmatic considerations, architectural characteristics, software engineering aspects, advances in parallel algorithms, performance studies, and application studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信