Effectivity of local bupivacaine infusion in the prevention of postoperative ileus

E. Kılıç
{"title":"Effectivity of local bupivacaine infusion in the prevention of postoperative ileus","authors":"E. Kılıç","doi":"10.4328/jcam.5980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"DOI: 10.4328/JCAM.5980 Received: 09.08.2018 Accepted: 22.09.2018 Published Online: 25.09.2018 Printed: 01.01.2019 J Clin Anal Med 2019;10(1): 109-12 Corresponding Author: Erol Kiliç, Departman of General Surgery, Tayfur Sökmen Medicine Faculty, Mustafa Kemal Universty, 31000, Hatay, Turkey. GSM: +905324067941 E-Mail: ekkilic55@gmail.com ORCID ID: 0000-0002-0229-2911 Abstract Aim: Inflammation is the predominant factor in the development of gastrointestinal dysmotility or postoperative ileus although dissection and neurological and inflammatory factors secondary to intestinal manipulation have been blamed. In this study, we investigated the effectivity of local bupivacaine infusion for prevention of postoperative ileus. Material and Method: This retrospective study included patients that underwent median laparotomy and received conventional analgesia alone or conventional analgesia followed by local bupivacaine. Patients that received conventional analgesia (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs] + opioids) followed by local bupivacaine infusion (15 mg/h during 48h) with Pain buster pump system were classified as Group 1 (n=30) and the patients that received conventional analgesia alone ( [NSAIDs] + opioids) were classified as Group 2 (n=31). Results: The groups were similar in terms of age, gender, preoperative ASA score, surgical technique, and operative time. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores during the periods 8-24 and 24-48 h and the analgesic requirement during the periods 0-8, 8-24, and 24-48 h were significantly decreased in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (p<0.05). In Group 1, active postoperative bowel sounds started earlier (38 vs. 47 h) and mean time to first flatus/defecation was significantly lower than in Group 2 (64.13 ± 9.06 vs. 77.90 ± 10.25 h) (p<0.05). Discussion: Transfascial bupivacaine infusion appears to be an effective technique since it reduced early postoperative pain and postoperative analgesic requirement and also provided favorable effects in the prevention of postoperative ileus, thereby leading to shorter intensive care unit stay.","PeriodicalId":44485,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4328/jcam.5980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

DOI: 10.4328/JCAM.5980 Received: 09.08.2018 Accepted: 22.09.2018 Published Online: 25.09.2018 Printed: 01.01.2019 J Clin Anal Med 2019;10(1): 109-12 Corresponding Author: Erol Kiliç, Departman of General Surgery, Tayfur Sökmen Medicine Faculty, Mustafa Kemal Universty, 31000, Hatay, Turkey. GSM: +905324067941 E-Mail: ekkilic55@gmail.com ORCID ID: 0000-0002-0229-2911 Abstract Aim: Inflammation is the predominant factor in the development of gastrointestinal dysmotility or postoperative ileus although dissection and neurological and inflammatory factors secondary to intestinal manipulation have been blamed. In this study, we investigated the effectivity of local bupivacaine infusion for prevention of postoperative ileus. Material and Method: This retrospective study included patients that underwent median laparotomy and received conventional analgesia alone or conventional analgesia followed by local bupivacaine. Patients that received conventional analgesia (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs] + opioids) followed by local bupivacaine infusion (15 mg/h during 48h) with Pain buster pump system were classified as Group 1 (n=30) and the patients that received conventional analgesia alone ( [NSAIDs] + opioids) were classified as Group 2 (n=31). Results: The groups were similar in terms of age, gender, preoperative ASA score, surgical technique, and operative time. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores during the periods 8-24 and 24-48 h and the analgesic requirement during the periods 0-8, 8-24, and 24-48 h were significantly decreased in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (p<0.05). In Group 1, active postoperative bowel sounds started earlier (38 vs. 47 h) and mean time to first flatus/defecation was significantly lower than in Group 2 (64.13 ± 9.06 vs. 77.90 ± 10.25 h) (p<0.05). Discussion: Transfascial bupivacaine infusion appears to be an effective technique since it reduced early postoperative pain and postoperative analgesic requirement and also provided favorable effects in the prevention of postoperative ileus, thereby leading to shorter intensive care unit stay.
布比卡因局部输注预防术后肠梗阻的疗效观察
DOI: 10.4328 / JCAM.5980收稿日期:09.08.2018收稿日期:22.09.2018出版日期:25.09.2018印刷日期:01.01.2019 J clinical Anal Med 2019;10(1): 109-12通讯作者:Erol Kiliç, Tayfur普通外科学系Sökmen穆斯塔法·凯末尔大学医学院,31000,Hatay,土耳其。摘要目的:炎症是胃肠道运动障碍或术后肠梗阻发生的主要因素,尽管解剖和继发于肠道操作的神经和炎症因素已被归咎于此。在这项研究中,我们探讨了局部布比卡因输注预防术后肠梗阻的有效性。材料和方法:本回顾性研究包括行剖腹切开术并单独使用常规镇痛或常规镇痛后局部使用布比卡因的患者。采用常规镇痛(非甾体类抗炎药[NSAIDs] +阿片类药物)后加镇痛剂泵系统局部输注布比卡因(48小时15 mg/h)的患者为1组(n=30),单纯采用常规镇痛([NSAIDs] +阿片类药物)的患者为2组(n=31)。结果:两组患者在年龄、性别、术前ASA评分、手术技术、手术时间等方面无明显差异。1组大鼠8 ~ 24、24 ~ 48 h的视觉模拟评分及0 ~ 8、8 ~ 24、24 ~ 48 h的镇痛需求均显著低于2组(p<0.05)。组1术后主动肠音出现较早(38 h vs. 47 h),平均首次放屁/排便时间显著低于组2(64.13±9.06 h vs. 77.90±10.25 h) (p<0.05)。讨论:经筋膜布比卡因输注似乎是一种有效的技术,因为它减少了术后早期疼痛和术后镇痛需求,并且在预防术后肠梗阻方面也有良好的效果,从而缩短了重症监护病房的住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine
Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Annals of Clinical and Analytical Medicine is an international open-access journal containing peer-reviewed high-quality articles on clinical medicine in the areas of all research study types, reviews, and case reports. Our journal has become an important platform with the help of language support services, which make it easier for writers who have English as their second language to share their clinical experiences with the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信