Two Wrongs Do Not Make a Right: Understanding Retaliation for Filing Discrimination Complaints in the U.S. Federal Government

IF 3.1 3区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
A. Alteri, Ellen V. Rubin, Young Joo Park
{"title":"Two Wrongs Do Not Make a Right: Understanding Retaliation for Filing Discrimination Complaints in the U.S. Federal Government","authors":"A. Alteri, Ellen V. Rubin, Young Joo Park","doi":"10.1177/00910260221123035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the primary barriers to equal treatment in the workplace is how victims are treated following a complaint of discrimination. If complaints are not taken seriously or if employees experience retaliation, this discourages others from objecting to discriminatory treatment. This research focuses on retaliation claims and organizational characteristics associated with those claims, using data from U.S. federal government agencies. We evaluate whether leadership reporting structure, staff capacity to manage complaints, and manager representativeness are associated with the rate of retaliation incidents reported by employees. Agencies where the Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Director reports directly to the agency head have lower rates of retaliation claims. Conversely, agencies with more EEO staff, per employee, have higher rates of retaliation claims. Manager representativeness is not associated with retaliation claims. Importantly, increased discrimination complaints may not signify a “bad” agency. Instead, this could signify that employees are filing because they believe their claims will be addressed fairly.","PeriodicalId":47366,"journal":{"name":"Public Personnel Management","volume":"52 1","pages":"3 - 24"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Personnel Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00910260221123035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

One of the primary barriers to equal treatment in the workplace is how victims are treated following a complaint of discrimination. If complaints are not taken seriously or if employees experience retaliation, this discourages others from objecting to discriminatory treatment. This research focuses on retaliation claims and organizational characteristics associated with those claims, using data from U.S. federal government agencies. We evaluate whether leadership reporting structure, staff capacity to manage complaints, and manager representativeness are associated with the rate of retaliation incidents reported by employees. Agencies where the Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Director reports directly to the agency head have lower rates of retaliation claims. Conversely, agencies with more EEO staff, per employee, have higher rates of retaliation claims. Manager representativeness is not associated with retaliation claims. Importantly, increased discrimination complaints may not signify a “bad” agency. Instead, this could signify that employees are filing because they believe their claims will be addressed fairly.
两个错误不等于一个正确:了解在美国联邦政府提出歧视投诉的报复行为
在工作场所获得平等待遇的主要障碍之一是在收到歧视投诉后如何对待受害者。如果投诉没有得到认真对待,或者员工遭到报复,这会阻碍其他人反对歧视性待遇。这项研究利用美国联邦政府机构的数据,重点关注报复指控以及与这些指控相关的组织特征。我们评估领导层的报告结构、员工处理投诉的能力和经理的代表性是否与员工报告的报复事件率有关。平等就业机会(EEO)主任直接向机构负责人报告的机构的报复索赔率较低。相反,每个雇员拥有更多EEO工作人员的机构的报复索赔率更高。经理代表性与报复索赔无关。重要的是,歧视投诉的增加可能并不意味着一个“糟糕”的机构。相反,这可能意味着员工正在申请,因为他们相信自己的索赔会得到公平解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信