On the beginning of the world: dominance feminism, afropessimism and the meanings of gender

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES
J. Nash
{"title":"On the beginning of the world: dominance feminism, afropessimism and the meanings of gender","authors":"J. Nash","doi":"10.1177/14647001211034084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dominance feminism and afropessimist theory, despite their critical appearances three decades apart, are undergirded by similar rhetorical strategies, political commitments and argumentative moves. This is the case even as afropessimism’s citational trajectory rarely invokes dominance feminism, and often positions itself as a critique of feminism’s imagined conception of gender as white, one that is thought to be most emphatically announced in the work of scholars like MacKinnon who invest in a gender binary, and in women’s oppressed location in this binary. In this article, I insist on reading dominance feminism and afropessimism together. In so doing, I aspire to challenge afropessimism’s prevailing conception of gender, revealing that while it is often critical of feminist conceptions of gender – particularly conceptualisations of gender that are thought to insist on the shared experiences and positions of women – it actually relies on similar argumentative moves, and even rhetorical seductions, as dominance feminism.","PeriodicalId":47281,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Theory","volume":"23 1","pages":"556 - 574"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/14647001211034084","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Theory","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14647001211034084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Dominance feminism and afropessimist theory, despite their critical appearances three decades apart, are undergirded by similar rhetorical strategies, political commitments and argumentative moves. This is the case even as afropessimism’s citational trajectory rarely invokes dominance feminism, and often positions itself as a critique of feminism’s imagined conception of gender as white, one that is thought to be most emphatically announced in the work of scholars like MacKinnon who invest in a gender binary, and in women’s oppressed location in this binary. In this article, I insist on reading dominance feminism and afropessimism together. In so doing, I aspire to challenge afropessimism’s prevailing conception of gender, revealing that while it is often critical of feminist conceptions of gender – particularly conceptualisations of gender that are thought to insist on the shared experiences and positions of women – it actually relies on similar argumentative moves, and even rhetorical seductions, as dominance feminism.
论世界之初:支配主义、女性主义、非洲悲观主义与性别的意义
支配性女权主义和非洲悲观主义理论,尽管它们的批判外表相隔三十年,但它们的基础是类似的修辞策略、政治承诺和辩论动作。即使非洲悲观主义的引用轨迹很少涉及支配性女权主义,而且经常将自己定位为对女权主义想象中的性别为白人的概念的批评,这一点被认为在麦金农等学者的作品中得到了最强调的宣布,他们投资于性别二元,以及女性在这二元中的受压迫地位。在这篇文章中,我坚持将主导女性主义和非洲悲观主义结合起来阅读。在这样做的过程中,我渴望挑战非洲悲观主义的主流性别概念,揭示出尽管它经常批评女权主义的性别概念——尤其是那些被认为坚持女性共同经历和立场的性别概念——但它实际上依赖于与主导女性主义相似的论证动作,甚至是修辞诱惑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Feminist Theory
Feminist Theory WOMENS STUDIES-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Feminist Theory is an international interdisciplinary journal that provides a forum for critical analysis and constructive debate within feminism. Theoretical Pluralism / Feminist Diversity Feminist Theory is genuinely interdisciplinary and reflects the diversity of feminism, incorporating perspectives from across the broad spectrum of the humanities and social sciences and the full range of feminist political and theoretical stances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信