Relative time in physical activity and sedentary behaviour across a 2-year pedometer-based intervention in people with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Kristina Larsson, Philip Von Rosen, Jenny Rossen, Unn-Britt Johansson, Maria Hagströmer
{"title":"Relative time in physical activity and sedentary behaviour across a 2-year pedometer-based intervention in people with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Kristina Larsson, Philip Von Rosen, Jenny Rossen, Unn-Britt Johansson, Maria Hagströmer","doi":"10.1186/s44167-023-00020-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes (T2D) need to be physically active, including moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) and light-intensity physical activity (LIPA) and reduce time in sedentary behaviour (SB). Few studies have evaluated the effect of randomised controlled trials taking all movement behaviours into account. This study aimed to investigate the effects of a 2-year pedometer-based intervention in people with prediabetes or T2D on relative time in movement behaviours.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Secondary analysis of longitudinal data on individuals with prediabetes or T2D from a three-armed randomised controlled trial, the Sophia Step Study, was conducted. The three groups were (1) a multi‑component group (self‑monitoring of steps with a pedometer plus counselling), (2) a single‑component group (self‑monitoring of steps with a pedometer, without counselling), and (3) a standard care group (control). The three behaviours MVPA, LIPA and SB during waking hours were measured with an ActiGraph GT1M accelerometer at baseline, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Relative time in MVPA, LIPA and SB for each participant at each time point was calculated and used as outcome measures. Linear mixed models assessed the effect of the intervention over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 184 participants with mean (SD) age 64.3 (7.6) years and 41% female was included. In the multi-component group, compared to the control group, a significant group-by-time interaction effect for relative time in all three behaviours was found at 6 and 18 months and for MVPA and SB at 24 months. In the single-component group, compared to the control group, an effect occurred in the MVPA and SB behaviours at 6 months and MVPA and LIPA at 24 months. The estimated marginal means ranged from 0.9 to 1.5% of more MVPA, 1.9-3.9% of less LIPA and from 0.5% of less SB to 1.7 more SB in the intervention groups compared to the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings show a beneficial effect on all behaviours over time in the two intervention groups compared to the control group. A more pronounced effect occurred in the multi-component intervention compared to the single-component intervention, implicating the importance of counselling in pedometer-based interventions. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02374788.</p>","PeriodicalId":73581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of activity, sedentary and sleep behaviors","volume":" ","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11960371/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of activity, sedentary and sleep behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44167-023-00020-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes (T2D) need to be physically active, including moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) and light-intensity physical activity (LIPA) and reduce time in sedentary behaviour (SB). Few studies have evaluated the effect of randomised controlled trials taking all movement behaviours into account. This study aimed to investigate the effects of a 2-year pedometer-based intervention in people with prediabetes or T2D on relative time in movement behaviours.

Methods: Secondary analysis of longitudinal data on individuals with prediabetes or T2D from a three-armed randomised controlled trial, the Sophia Step Study, was conducted. The three groups were (1) a multi‑component group (self‑monitoring of steps with a pedometer plus counselling), (2) a single‑component group (self‑monitoring of steps with a pedometer, without counselling), and (3) a standard care group (control). The three behaviours MVPA, LIPA and SB during waking hours were measured with an ActiGraph GT1M accelerometer at baseline, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Relative time in MVPA, LIPA and SB for each participant at each time point was calculated and used as outcome measures. Linear mixed models assessed the effect of the intervention over time.

Results: In total 184 participants with mean (SD) age 64.3 (7.6) years and 41% female was included. In the multi-component group, compared to the control group, a significant group-by-time interaction effect for relative time in all three behaviours was found at 6 and 18 months and for MVPA and SB at 24 months. In the single-component group, compared to the control group, an effect occurred in the MVPA and SB behaviours at 6 months and MVPA and LIPA at 24 months. The estimated marginal means ranged from 0.9 to 1.5% of more MVPA, 1.9-3.9% of less LIPA and from 0.5% of less SB to 1.7 more SB in the intervention groups compared to the control group.

Conclusions: The findings show a beneficial effect on all behaviours over time in the two intervention groups compared to the control group. A more pronounced effect occurred in the multi-component intervention compared to the single-component intervention, implicating the importance of counselling in pedometer-based interventions. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02374788.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

对糖尿病前期或2型糖尿病患者进行为期2年的计步器干预后,身体活动和久坐行为的相对时间:一项随机对照试验的二次分析
背景:糖尿病前期或2型糖尿病(T2D)患者需要进行身体活动,包括中高强度身体活动(MVPA)和轻强度身体活动(LIPA),并减少久坐行为(SB)的时间。很少有研究评估将所有运动行为考虑在内的随机对照试验的效果。本研究旨在调查2年基于计步器的干预对糖尿病前期或T2D患者运动行为相对时间的影响。方法:对来自三臂随机对照试验Sophia Step研究的前驱糖尿病或T2D患者的纵向数据进行二次分析。这三组分别是:(1)多组分组(用计步器自我监测步数加咨询),(2)单组分组(用计步器自我监测步数,不加咨询),(3)标准护理组(对照)。在基线、6、12、18和24个月时,用ActiGraph GT1M加速度计测量醒时MVPA、LIPA和SB三种行为。计算每个参与者在每个时间点的MVPA、LIPA和SB的相对时间,并将其用作结果测量。线性混合模型随时间评估干预的效果。结果:共纳入184名参与者,平均(SD)年龄64.3(7.6)岁,41%为女性。在多组分组中,与对照组相比,在6个月和18个月以及在24个月时MVPA和SB的相对时间中发现了显著的组-时间相互作用效应。在单组分组中,与对照组相比,在6个月时MVPA和SB行为以及在24个月时MVPA和LIPA行为发生了影响。与对照组相比,干预组的估计边际均值为MVPA增加0.9 - 1.5%,LIPA减少1.9-3.9%,SB减少0.5% - 1.7。结论:研究结果表明,随着时间的推移,与对照组相比,两个干预组对所有行为都有有益的影响。与单组分干预相比,多组分干预的效果更为明显,这意味着在基于计步器的干预中咨询的重要性。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02374788。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信