Silicon membranes for extracorporeal life support: a comparison of design and fabrication methodologies

IF 3 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
David G. Blauvelt, Benjamin W. Chui, Nicholas C. Higgins, Francisco J. Baltazar, Shuvo Roy
{"title":"Silicon membranes for extracorporeal life support: a comparison of design and fabrication methodologies","authors":"David G. Blauvelt,&nbsp;Benjamin W. Chui,&nbsp;Nicholas C. Higgins,&nbsp;Francisco J. Baltazar,&nbsp;Shuvo Roy","doi":"10.1007/s10544-022-00639-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Extracorporeal life support is an advanced therapy that circulates blood through an extracorporeal oxygenator, performing gas exchange outside the body. However, its use is limited by severe complications, including bleeding, clotting, and hemolysis. Semiconductor silicon-based membranes have emerged as an alternative to traditional hollow-fiber semipermeable membranes. These membranes offer excellent gas exchange efficiency and the potential to increase hemocompatibility by improving flow dynamics. In this work, we evaluate two next-generation silicon membrane designs, which are intended to be mechanically robust and efficient in gas exchange, while simultaneously reducing fabrication complexity. The “window” design features 10 µm pores on one side and large windows on the back side. The “cavern” design also uses 10 µm pores but contains a network of interconnected buried caverns to distribute the sweep gas from smaller inlet holes. Both designs were shown to be technically viable and able to be reproducibly fabricated. In addition, they both were mechanically robust and withstood 30 psi of transmembrane pressure without breakage or bubbling. At low sweep gas pressures, gas transfer efficiency was similar, with the partial pressure of oxygen in water increasing by 10.7 ± 2.3 mmHg (mean ± standard deviation) and 13.6 ± 1.9 mmHg for the window and cavern membranes, respectively. Gas transfer efficiency was also similar at higher pressures. At 10 psi, oxygen tension increased by 16.8 ± 5.7 mmHg (window) and 18.9 ± 1.3 mmHg (cavern). We conclude that silicon membranes featuring a 10 µm pore size can simplify the fabrication process and improve mechanical robustness while maintaining excellent efficiency.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n <figure><div><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></div></figure>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":490,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Microdevices","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Microdevices","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10544-022-00639-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extracorporeal life support is an advanced therapy that circulates blood through an extracorporeal oxygenator, performing gas exchange outside the body. However, its use is limited by severe complications, including bleeding, clotting, and hemolysis. Semiconductor silicon-based membranes have emerged as an alternative to traditional hollow-fiber semipermeable membranes. These membranes offer excellent gas exchange efficiency and the potential to increase hemocompatibility by improving flow dynamics. In this work, we evaluate two next-generation silicon membrane designs, which are intended to be mechanically robust and efficient in gas exchange, while simultaneously reducing fabrication complexity. The “window” design features 10 µm pores on one side and large windows on the back side. The “cavern” design also uses 10 µm pores but contains a network of interconnected buried caverns to distribute the sweep gas from smaller inlet holes. Both designs were shown to be technically viable and able to be reproducibly fabricated. In addition, they both were mechanically robust and withstood 30 psi of transmembrane pressure without breakage or bubbling. At low sweep gas pressures, gas transfer efficiency was similar, with the partial pressure of oxygen in water increasing by 10.7 ± 2.3 mmHg (mean ± standard deviation) and 13.6 ± 1.9 mmHg for the window and cavern membranes, respectively. Gas transfer efficiency was also similar at higher pressures. At 10 psi, oxygen tension increased by 16.8 ± 5.7 mmHg (window) and 18.9 ± 1.3 mmHg (cavern). We conclude that silicon membranes featuring a 10 µm pore size can simplify the fabrication process and improve mechanical robustness while maintaining excellent efficiency.

Graphical Abstract

Abstract Image

用于体外生命支持的硅膜:设计和制造方法的比较
体外生命支持是一种先进的治疗方法,通过体外氧合器循环血液,在体外进行气体交换。然而,它的使用受到严重并发症的限制,包括出血、凝血和溶血。半导体硅基膜已成为传统中空纤维半透膜的替代品。这些膜提供了优异的气体交换效率,并有可能通过改善流动动力学来增加血液相容性。在这项工作中,我们评估了两种下一代硅膜设计,它们旨在具有机械坚固性和气体交换效率,同时降低制造复杂性。“窗户”的设计特点是一侧有10µm的孔,背面有大窗户。“洞穴”设计也使用了10微米的孔隙,但包含了一个相互连接的地下洞穴网络,以分配来自较小入口孔的扫气。这两种设计都被证明在技术上是可行的,并且能够重复制造。此外,它们都具有坚固的机械性能,能够承受30 psi的跨膜压力而不会破裂或起泡。在低扫气压力下,气体传递效率相似,窗膜和洞膜的水中氧气分压分别增加了10.7±2.3 mmHg(平均值±标准差)和13.6±1.9 mmHg。在较高的压力下,气体传递效率也相似。在10 psi时,氧张力增加16.8±5.7 mmHg(窗口)和18.9±1.3 mmHg(洞穴)。我们得出结论,孔径为10 μ m的硅膜可以简化制造过程,提高机械稳健性,同时保持优异的效率。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical Microdevices
Biomedical Microdevices 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
32
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Biomedical Microdevices: BioMEMS and Biomedical Nanotechnology is an interdisciplinary periodical devoted to all aspects of research in the medical diagnostic and therapeutic applications of Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (BioMEMS) and nanotechnology for medicine and biology. General subjects of interest include the design, characterization, testing, modeling and clinical validation of microfabricated systems, and their integration on-chip and in larger functional units. The specific interests of the Journal include systems for neural stimulation and recording, bioseparation technologies such as nanofilters and electrophoretic equipment, miniaturized analytic and DNA identification systems, biosensors, and micro/nanotechnologies for cell and tissue research, tissue engineering, cell transplantation, and the controlled release of drugs and biological molecules. Contributions reporting on fundamental and applied investigations of the material science, biochemistry, and physics of biomedical microdevices and nanotechnology are encouraged. A non-exhaustive list of fields of interest includes: nanoparticle synthesis, characterization, and validation of therapeutic or imaging efficacy in animal models; biocompatibility; biochemical modification of microfabricated devices, with reference to non-specific protein adsorption, and the active immobilization and patterning of proteins on micro/nanofabricated surfaces; the dynamics of fluids in micro-and-nano-fabricated channels; the electromechanical and structural response of micro/nanofabricated systems; the interactions of microdevices with cells and tissues, including biocompatibility and biodegradation studies; variations in the characteristics of the systems as a function of the micro/nanofabrication parameters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信