Knowledge and Perceived Barriers towards Intermittent Prevention of Malaria in Pregnancy: A Cross-Sectional Study

F. Agyei, Gideon Dzando, Anthony B. Donyi, E. A. Nonoh, Rebecca Dordunu, Catherine Konadu Opoku
{"title":"Knowledge and Perceived Barriers towards Intermittent Prevention of Malaria in Pregnancy: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"F. Agyei, Gideon Dzando, Anthony B. Donyi, E. A. Nonoh, Rebecca Dordunu, Catherine Konadu Opoku","doi":"10.4236/OJIM.2021.111002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Intermittent prevention of malaria is a key strategy adopted globally to ensure the wellbeing of pregnant women. By extension, these strategies enhance the healthy development of the fetus. This study assesses the knowledge and practices of pregnant women towards intermittent malaria prevention strategies in the Juaben Government Hospital of Ghana. Methods: A cross-sectional, quantitative, descriptive survey was conducted among 120 pregnant women at the antenatal clinic of the Juaben Government hospital in the Ashanti region of Ghana using a simple random sampling technique in selecting the study participants. The participant response rate was 94.5%. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22.0. Results: Majority (54.2%) of respondents were between 20 - 29 years of age. Majority of study respondents attended Antenatal visits in their first trimester of pregnancy. Majority (69.2%) have knowledge of malaria preventive strategies in pregnancy, with about 70% of respondents stating these strategies were designed only for pregnant women. Only 37.5% of study respondents could rightly identify the chemoprophylaxis indicated for malaria prevention in pregnancy. Whereas majority (93.3%) of respondents owned insecticide-treated mosquito nets, only 63.3% utilized these nets for their purpose. Barriers to utilization of insecticide-treated nets include difficulty in setting up the nets (26.7%), using mosquito coils (10.8%), and feeling uncomfortable sleeping in the nets (36.7%). Barriers to taking malaria prophylaxis include distance to health facilities (28.3%), thoughts of not being sick with malaria (55.8%), using herbs (10.0%), and not being aware of the essence of prophylaxis (7.5%). Conclusion: Knowledge of malaria preventive strategies in pregnancy is high. However, utilization of these strategies is low due to perceived human and institutional barriers. A comprehensive community-wide approach is required to improve the utilization of these services among pregnant women.","PeriodicalId":60567,"journal":{"name":"内科学期刊(英文)","volume":"11 1","pages":"27-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"内科学期刊(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/OJIM.2021.111002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Intermittent prevention of malaria is a key strategy adopted globally to ensure the wellbeing of pregnant women. By extension, these strategies enhance the healthy development of the fetus. This study assesses the knowledge and practices of pregnant women towards intermittent malaria prevention strategies in the Juaben Government Hospital of Ghana. Methods: A cross-sectional, quantitative, descriptive survey was conducted among 120 pregnant women at the antenatal clinic of the Juaben Government hospital in the Ashanti region of Ghana using a simple random sampling technique in selecting the study participants. The participant response rate was 94.5%. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22.0. Results: Majority (54.2%) of respondents were between 20 - 29 years of age. Majority of study respondents attended Antenatal visits in their first trimester of pregnancy. Majority (69.2%) have knowledge of malaria preventive strategies in pregnancy, with about 70% of respondents stating these strategies were designed only for pregnant women. Only 37.5% of study respondents could rightly identify the chemoprophylaxis indicated for malaria prevention in pregnancy. Whereas majority (93.3%) of respondents owned insecticide-treated mosquito nets, only 63.3% utilized these nets for their purpose. Barriers to utilization of insecticide-treated nets include difficulty in setting up the nets (26.7%), using mosquito coils (10.8%), and feeling uncomfortable sleeping in the nets (36.7%). Barriers to taking malaria prophylaxis include distance to health facilities (28.3%), thoughts of not being sick with malaria (55.8%), using herbs (10.0%), and not being aware of the essence of prophylaxis (7.5%). Conclusion: Knowledge of malaria preventive strategies in pregnancy is high. However, utilization of these strategies is low due to perceived human and institutional barriers. A comprehensive community-wide approach is required to improve the utilization of these services among pregnant women.
妊娠期间歇性预防疟疾的知识和感知障碍:一项横断面研究
背景:间歇性预防疟疾是全球为确保孕妇健康而采取的一项关键战略。从广义上讲,这些策略可以促进胎儿的健康发育。本研究评估了加纳Juaben政府医院孕妇对间歇性疟疾预防策略的知识和实践。方法:采用简单的随机抽样技术,在加纳阿散蒂地区Juaben政府医院的产前诊所对120名孕妇进行横断面、定量、描述性调查,选择研究参与者。参与者的回答率为94.5%。数据使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)22.0版进行分析。结果:大多数(54.2%)受访者的年龄在20-29岁之间。大多数研究对象在怀孕的前三个月参加了产前检查。大多数人(69.2%)了解怀孕期间的疟疾预防策略,约70%的受访者表示这些策略仅针对孕妇。只有37.5%的研究对象能够正确识别妊娠期疟疾预防所需的化学预防。尽管大多数(93.3%)受访者拥有经过杀虫剂处理的蚊帐,但只有63.3%的人将这些蚊帐用于自己的目的。使用驱虫蚊帐的障碍包括难以设置蚊帐(26.7%)、使用蚊帐(10.8%)和在蚊帐中睡觉感到不舒服(36.7%)。预防疟疾的障碍包括距离卫生设施较远(28.3%)、没有患疟疾的想法(55.8%)、使用草药(10.0%),不了解预防的本质(7.5%)。结论:对妊娠期疟疾预防策略的认识较高。然而,由于人们认为存在人力和体制障碍,这些战略的利用率很低。需要采取一种全面的全社区方法来提高孕妇对这些服务的利用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书