Do Calcium Chelators Play a Role in the Removal of Calcium Hydroxide From Root Canals? A Systematic Review of Laboratory Studies.

IF 1.6 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Nandini Suresh, Aswathi Varghese, Sathish Sundar, Venkateshbabu Nagendrababu, Natanasabapathy Velmurugan
{"title":"Do Calcium Chelators Play a Role in the Removal of Calcium Hydroxide From Root Canals? A Systematic Review of Laboratory Studies.","authors":"Nandini Suresh, Aswathi Varghese, Sathish Sundar, Venkateshbabu Nagendrababu, Natanasabapathy Velmurugan","doi":"10.14744/eej.2021.73644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify whether root canal irrigants with calcium chelation ability play a role in the removal of calcium hydroxide (CH) from the root canals when compared to non-chelators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The protocol is registered in the Open Science Framework registry (doi 10.17605/OSF.IO/CHG2Q). PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, Google Scholar, Science direct and open grey databases were searched until March 2021. Laboratory studies comparing the effectiveness of calcium chelators in the removal of CH with non-chelators delivered using needle irrigation, irrigation agitation or instrumentation techniques were included. The quality of included studies was appraised using a modified Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for a randomised clinical trial. Two independent reviewers were involved in study selection, data extraction, appraising the quality of studies. Any disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The current review included 17 studies, with 16 being of \"moderate\" quality and one of \"low\" quality. Due to methodological differences within the included studies, quantitative analysis was not performed. Laboratory studies were only included in the current review because no clinical study exists on this topic. Evidence from the review indicates that calcium chelators are superior to non-chelators in the removal of CH when used with needle irrigation, passive ultrasonic irrigation and instrumentation techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Calcium chelators are superior in the removal of CH from the root canal system over non-chelators.</p>","PeriodicalId":11860,"journal":{"name":"European Endodontic Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"11-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9035855/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2021.73644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify whether root canal irrigants with calcium chelation ability play a role in the removal of calcium hydroxide (CH) from the root canals when compared to non-chelators.

Methods: The protocol is registered in the Open Science Framework registry (doi 10.17605/OSF.IO/CHG2Q). PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, Google Scholar, Science direct and open grey databases were searched until March 2021. Laboratory studies comparing the effectiveness of calcium chelators in the removal of CH with non-chelators delivered using needle irrigation, irrigation agitation or instrumentation techniques were included. The quality of included studies was appraised using a modified Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for a randomised clinical trial. Two independent reviewers were involved in study selection, data extraction, appraising the quality of studies. Any disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer.

Results: The current review included 17 studies, with 16 being of "moderate" quality and one of "low" quality. Due to methodological differences within the included studies, quantitative analysis was not performed. Laboratory studies were only included in the current review because no clinical study exists on this topic. Evidence from the review indicates that calcium chelators are superior to non-chelators in the removal of CH when used with needle irrigation, passive ultrasonic irrigation and instrumentation techniques.

Conclusion: Calcium chelators are superior in the removal of CH from the root canal system over non-chelators.

钙螯合剂在去除根管中的氢氧化钙中起作用吗?实验室研究的系统综述
目的:与非螯合剂相比,具有钙螯合能力的根管冲洗剂是否在去除根管中的氢氧化钙(CH)方面发挥作用。方法:该方案在开放科学框架注册中心(doi 10.17605/OSF.IO/CHG2Q)注册。检索PubMed、Scopus、Embase、Cochrane Library、ProQuest、Google Scholar、Science direct和开放灰色数据库,直到2021年3月。包括比较钙螯合剂与非螯合剂在去除CH方面的有效性的实验室研究,所述非螯合剂使用针头冲洗、冲洗搅拌或仪器技术递送。纳入研究的质量使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所改良的随机临床试验关键评估清单进行评估。两名独立评审员参与了研究选择、数据提取和研究质量评估。任何分歧都由第三位评审员解决。结果:目前的综述包括17项研究,其中16项为“中等”质量,1项为“低”质量。由于纳入研究的方法学差异,未进行定量分析。实验室研究仅包括在当前综述中,因为没有关于该主题的临床研究。综述中的证据表明,当与针头冲洗、被动超声冲洗和仪器技术一起使用时,钙螯合剂在去除CH方面优于非螯合剂。结论:钙螯合剂对CH根管系统的清除效果优于非螯合剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Endodontic Journal
European Endodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信