Serological responses and protection levels in chickens administered with Newcastle disease vaccines

Q4 Veterinary
Geumji Seung, Ji-Yeon Kim, Hyobi Kim, Ji-Yeon Kim, Yang-Ho Jang, Y. Kim, M. Her, S. Yi, Keun-Woo Lee, Il Jang, Y. J. Lee
{"title":"Serological responses and protection levels in chickens administered with Newcastle disease vaccines","authors":"Geumji Seung, Ji-Yeon Kim, Hyobi Kim, Ji-Yeon Kim, Yang-Ho Jang, Y. Kim, M. Her, S. Yi, Keun-Woo Lee, Il Jang, Y. J. Lee","doi":"10.14405/kjvr.20220031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vaccination against Newcastle disease (ND) is the most effective means of controlling the disease, and these vaccines are commercialized only after their safety and effectiveness have been verified through tests that comply with Korean Standards of National Lot Release for Veterinary Biologics. This study investigated whether a relatively convenient and safe serological test can be used in place of the challenge test using highly virulent ND virus. Hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were considered positive of log2 2 or more and cutoff value of 200 or more, respectively, in both live and inactivated vaccines. However, when the antibody levels of the live and inactivated vaccines induced using the Ulster 2C, KBNP-C4152R2L, and K148/08 strains were compared, the antibody titers for inactivated vaccines were significantly higher than those for live vaccines in both the HI assay and ELISA. A strong positive correlation was observed between HI and ELISA antibody titers. The live vaccines corresponded to a survival rates of ≥ 80% and the inactivated vaccines corresponded to 100% survival rates. This study confirmed that standard efficacy tests can serve as serological tests, and can replace the challenge test and that the vaccine approval process can be improved.","PeriodicalId":38891,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Veterinary Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Veterinary Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14405/kjvr.20220031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vaccination against Newcastle disease (ND) is the most effective means of controlling the disease, and these vaccines are commercialized only after their safety and effectiveness have been verified through tests that comply with Korean Standards of National Lot Release for Veterinary Biologics. This study investigated whether a relatively convenient and safe serological test can be used in place of the challenge test using highly virulent ND virus. Hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were considered positive of log2 2 or more and cutoff value of 200 or more, respectively, in both live and inactivated vaccines. However, when the antibody levels of the live and inactivated vaccines induced using the Ulster 2C, KBNP-C4152R2L, and K148/08 strains were compared, the antibody titers for inactivated vaccines were significantly higher than those for live vaccines in both the HI assay and ELISA. A strong positive correlation was observed between HI and ELISA antibody titers. The live vaccines corresponded to a survival rates of ≥ 80% and the inactivated vaccines corresponded to 100% survival rates. This study confirmed that standard efficacy tests can serve as serological tests, and can replace the challenge test and that the vaccine approval process can be improved.
新城疫疫苗对鸡的血清学反应和保护水平
针对新城疫(ND)的疫苗接种是最有效的控制手段,这些疫苗必须通过符合韩国兽医生物制剂国家批号放行标准的试验,验证其安全性和有效性,才能商业化。本研究探讨了是否可以使用一种相对方便和安全的血清学检测来代替使用高毒力新城疫病毒的攻毒试验。在活疫苗和灭活疫苗中,血凝抑制(HI)试验和酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)分别被认为是log22或更高的阳性和200或更高的临界值。然而,当比较用Ulster 2C、KBNP-C4152R2L和K148/08菌株诱导的活疫苗和灭活疫苗的抗体水平时,在HI试验和ELISA中,灭活疫苗的抗体滴度均显著高于活疫苗。HI抗体滴度与ELISA抗体滴度呈正相关。活疫苗的存活率≥80%,灭活疫苗的存活率为100%。本研究证实了标准效力试验可作为血清学试验,可替代攻毒试验,并可改进疫苗审批程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Veterinary Research
Korean Journal of Veterinary Research Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信