The Effects of Contextual Cues and Visual Clarity in Sponsorship Disclosures on the Interpretive Process: Processing Fluency

IF 10.2 Q1 Social Sciences
Jun Heo, Soojin Kim, A. Jung
{"title":"The Effects of Contextual Cues and Visual Clarity in Sponsorship Disclosures on the Interpretive Process: Processing Fluency","authors":"Jun Heo, Soojin Kim, A. Jung","doi":"10.1080/15252019.2022.2099485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study explored whether the clarity-enhancing elements and contextual cues in sponsorship disclosures would help (or impede) consumers’ recognition and information processing of native advertising and, if so, which elements would affect them more or less. A lab experiment using an eye-tracking device was conducted. Various features of the sponsorship disclosure were drawn from the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) disclosure guidelines (e.g., disclosure language, location, repetition, and prominence, including font style, size, color, effects, and background). Findings implied that clear labeling is strongly related to recognition of the commercial nature of the content, whereas clarity enhancers are related to information processing backed by perceptual fluency. In addition, complying with FTC’s disclosure guidelines may increase pleasant processing fluency and recognition of the sponsorship disclosure. A recommendation is made for advertising practitioners, publishers, and regulators to avoid an unnecessary stigma toward native advertising.","PeriodicalId":37217,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interactive Advertising","volume":"22 1","pages":"223 - 237"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interactive Advertising","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2022.2099485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract This study explored whether the clarity-enhancing elements and contextual cues in sponsorship disclosures would help (or impede) consumers’ recognition and information processing of native advertising and, if so, which elements would affect them more or less. A lab experiment using an eye-tracking device was conducted. Various features of the sponsorship disclosure were drawn from the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) disclosure guidelines (e.g., disclosure language, location, repetition, and prominence, including font style, size, color, effects, and background). Findings implied that clear labeling is strongly related to recognition of the commercial nature of the content, whereas clarity enhancers are related to information processing backed by perceptual fluency. In addition, complying with FTC’s disclosure guidelines may increase pleasant processing fluency and recognition of the sponsorship disclosure. A recommendation is made for advertising practitioners, publishers, and regulators to avoid an unnecessary stigma toward native advertising.
赞助披露中的语境提示和视觉清晰度对口译过程的影响:处理流利性
摘要:本研究探讨赞助披露中的清晰度增强元素和语境线索是否有助于(或阻碍)消费者对原生广告的识别和信息处理,如果有,哪些元素会对消费者产生或多或少的影响。利用眼动追踪装置进行了实验室实验。赞助披露的各种特征来自联邦贸易委员会(FTC)披露指南(例如,披露语言、位置、重复和突出,包括字体样式、大小、颜色、效果和背景)。研究结果表明,清晰的标签与识别内容的商业性质密切相关,而清晰性增强与感知流畅性支持的信息处理有关。此外,遵守联邦贸易委员会的披露准则可能会增加愉快的处理流畅性和对赞助披露的认可。建议广告从业者,出版商和监管机构避免对本地广告产生不必要的污名。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Interactive Advertising
Journal of Interactive Advertising Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书