Comparison of 21 Days Versus 10 Days Bladder Catheterization after Hypospadias Repair

Esculapio Pub Date : 2021-07-16 DOI:10.51273/esc21.2517216
M. Abdullah, Muhammad Saleem, Ghulam Mujtaba Zafar, Farrukh Mehmood Sattar, Imran Hashim, Arslan Raza Wasti
{"title":"Comparison of 21 Days Versus 10 Days Bladder Catheterization after Hypospadias Repair","authors":"M. Abdullah, Muhammad Saleem, Ghulam Mujtaba Zafar, Farrukh Mehmood Sattar, Imran Hashim, Arslan Raza Wasti","doi":"10.51273/esc21.2517216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To compare 21 days versus 10 days bladder catheterization after hypospadias repair. Methods: After approval from ethical committee, Randomised controlled trial performed, in which 196 male patients were enrolled in the study that was conducted at department of pediatric surgery, Children hospital, Lahore. All patients underwent Snodgrass procedure. Group-1 patients were considered for 10 days bladder catheterization for hypospadias repair and group-2 patients were catheterized for 21 days. Complications were documented on follow-up visits in group 1 at 1 week (17 days), 3 weeks (34 days), and 6 weeks (51 days) after catheter removal. In group 2 at 1 week (day 28th), 3 weeks (day 42nd), 6 weeks (day 63rd) after catheter removal. Results: The mean age in group-1 and group-2 was 7.25 ± 3.22 years and 6.29±3.02 years. There were significantly less cases of urethrocutaneous fistula in group 2 when compared to group 1. Urethro-cutaneous fistulas (UCF) developed in 13(13.26%) ,11(11.22%) and 10 (10.2%) cases at 1, 3, and 6 weeks post catheter removal follow up in group 1. While in group 2 UCF developed in 4 (4.08%), 3(3.1%) and 2(2.04%) at 1, 3, and 6 weeks follow up. There were 5(5.2%) and 4(4.1%) cases of post-operative wound infection in groups 1 and 2 respectively (p-value = 0.500). Wound dehiscence was seen in 1 (1.02%) case in group 1 and was not seen in group 2(p value =0.500). glans dehiscence was not seen in group 1 while 1 (1.02%) case seen in group 2 (p value 0.500). Conclusion: We conclude that 21 days catheterization after hypospadias repair gives better outcome and fewer complications when compared to 10 days catheterization. Keywords: Bladder catheterization; Hypospadias repair; Fistula formation. How to cite: Abdullah M., Saleem M., Zafar M.G., Sattar M.F., Hasnain I, Wasti R.A. Comparison of 21 Days Versus 10 Days Bladder Catheterization for Hypospadias Repair. Esculapio 2021;17(02):187-190.","PeriodicalId":11923,"journal":{"name":"Esculapio","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Esculapio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51273/esc21.2517216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare 21 days versus 10 days bladder catheterization after hypospadias repair. Methods: After approval from ethical committee, Randomised controlled trial performed, in which 196 male patients were enrolled in the study that was conducted at department of pediatric surgery, Children hospital, Lahore. All patients underwent Snodgrass procedure. Group-1 patients were considered for 10 days bladder catheterization for hypospadias repair and group-2 patients were catheterized for 21 days. Complications were documented on follow-up visits in group 1 at 1 week (17 days), 3 weeks (34 days), and 6 weeks (51 days) after catheter removal. In group 2 at 1 week (day 28th), 3 weeks (day 42nd), 6 weeks (day 63rd) after catheter removal. Results: The mean age in group-1 and group-2 was 7.25 ± 3.22 years and 6.29±3.02 years. There were significantly less cases of urethrocutaneous fistula in group 2 when compared to group 1. Urethro-cutaneous fistulas (UCF) developed in 13(13.26%) ,11(11.22%) and 10 (10.2%) cases at 1, 3, and 6 weeks post catheter removal follow up in group 1. While in group 2 UCF developed in 4 (4.08%), 3(3.1%) and 2(2.04%) at 1, 3, and 6 weeks follow up. There were 5(5.2%) and 4(4.1%) cases of post-operative wound infection in groups 1 and 2 respectively (p-value = 0.500). Wound dehiscence was seen in 1 (1.02%) case in group 1 and was not seen in group 2(p value =0.500). glans dehiscence was not seen in group 1 while 1 (1.02%) case seen in group 2 (p value 0.500). Conclusion: We conclude that 21 days catheterization after hypospadias repair gives better outcome and fewer complications when compared to 10 days catheterization. Keywords: Bladder catheterization; Hypospadias repair; Fistula formation. How to cite: Abdullah M., Saleem M., Zafar M.G., Sattar M.F., Hasnain I, Wasti R.A. Comparison of 21 Days Versus 10 Days Bladder Catheterization for Hypospadias Repair. Esculapio 2021;17(02):187-190.
尿道下裂修补术后21天和10天膀胱导尿的比较
目的:比较尿道下裂修复术后21天和10天膀胱导尿。方法:经伦理委员会批准,在拉合尔儿童医院儿科外科进行随机对照试验,纳入196例男性患者。所有患者均行Snodgrass手术。组1患者留置膀胱10 d用于尿道下裂修复,组2患者留置膀胱21 d。在拔管后1周(17天)、3周(34天)和6周(51天)随访时记录并发症。2组分别于拔管后1周(第28天)、3周(第42天)、6周(第63天)。结果:1、2组患者平均年龄分别为7.25±3.22岁和6.29±3.02岁。2组尿道瘘发生率明显低于1组。在拔管后1周、3周和6周,1组患者发生尿路-皮肤瘘(UCF)分别为13例(13.26%)、11例(11.22%)和10例(10.2%)。2组在随访1、3、6周时发生UCF的分别为4例(4.08%)、3例(3.1%)和2例(2.04%)。1组术后创面感染5例(5.2%),2组术后创面感染4例(4.1%)(p值= 0.500)。1组创面裂开1例(1.02%),2组未见创面裂开(p值=0.500)。1组未见龟头破裂,2组1例(1.02%)(p值0.500)。结论:尿道下裂修补术后21天插管比10天插管效果更好,并发症更少。关键词:膀胱导尿;尿道下裂修复;瘘管形成。引用本文:Abdullah M., Saleem M., Zafar M.G., Sattar M.F., Hasnain I, Wasti R.A.尿道下裂21天和10天膀胱导尿修复术的比较。Esculapio 2021; 17(02): 187 - 190。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信