Beyond the Contract: Client Behavior from Origination to Default as the New Set of the Loss Given Default Risk Drivers

IF 0.4 4区 经济学 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Wojciech Starosta
{"title":"Beyond the Contract: Client Behavior from Origination to Default as the New Set of the Loss Given Default Risk Drivers","authors":"Wojciech Starosta","doi":"10.21314/JRMV.2020.234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modeling loss given default has increased in popularity as it has become a crucial parameter for establishing capital buffers under Basel II and III and for calculating the impairment of financial assets under the International Financial Reporting Standard 9. The most recent literature on this topic focuses mainly on estimation methods and less on the variables used to explain the variability in loss given default. In this paper, we expand this part of the modeling process by constructing a set of client-behavior-based predictors that can be used to construct more precise models, and we investigate the economic justifications empirically to examine their potential usage. The main novelty introduced in this paper is the connection between loss given default and the behavior of the contract owner, not just the contract itself. This approach results in the reduction of the values of selected error measures and progressively improves the forecasting ability. The effect is more visible in a parametric method (fractional regression) than in a nonparametric method (regression tree). Our findings support incorporating client-oriented information into loss given default models.","PeriodicalId":43447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Risk Model Validation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Risk Model Validation","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21314/JRMV.2020.234","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Modeling loss given default has increased in popularity as it has become a crucial parameter for establishing capital buffers under Basel II and III and for calculating the impairment of financial assets under the International Financial Reporting Standard 9. The most recent literature on this topic focuses mainly on estimation methods and less on the variables used to explain the variability in loss given default. In this paper, we expand this part of the modeling process by constructing a set of client-behavior-based predictors that can be used to construct more precise models, and we investigate the economic justifications empirically to examine their potential usage. The main novelty introduced in this paper is the connection between loss given default and the behavior of the contract owner, not just the contract itself. This approach results in the reduction of the values of selected error measures and progressively improves the forecasting ability. The effect is more visible in a parametric method (fractional regression) than in a nonparametric method (regression tree). Our findings support incorporating client-oriented information into loss given default models.
合同之外:客户行为从起源到违约是一组新的违约风险驱动因素
违约损失建模越来越受欢迎,因为它已成为巴塞尔协议II和III下建立资本缓冲以及国际财务报告准则9下计算金融资产减值的关键参数。关于这一主题的最新文献主要集中在估计方法上,而较少关注用于解释默认情况下损失变异性的变量。在本文中,我们通过构建一组基于客户行为的预测因子来扩展建模过程的这一部分,这些预测因子可用于构建更精确的模型,并且我们通过经验调查经济理由来检查它们的潜在用途。本文引入的主要新颖之处在于违约造成的损失与合约所有者的行为之间的联系,而不仅仅是合约本身。该方法减少了所选误差度量的值,逐步提高了预测能力。这种效果在参数方法(分数回归)中比在非参数方法(回归树)中更明显。我们的研究结果支持将面向客户的信息纳入给定默认模型的损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
28.60%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: As monetary institutions rely greatly on economic and financial models for a wide array of applications, model validation has become progressively inventive within the field of risk. The Journal of Risk Model Validation focuses on the implementation and validation of risk models, and aims to provide a greater understanding of key issues including the empirical evaluation of existing models, pitfalls in model validation and the development of new methods. We also publish papers on back-testing. Our main field of application is in credit risk modelling but we are happy to consider any issues of risk model validation for any financial asset class. The Journal of Risk Model Validation considers submissions in the form of research papers on topics including, but not limited to: Empirical model evaluation studies Backtesting studies Stress-testing studies New methods of model validation/backtesting/stress-testing Best practices in model development, deployment, production and maintenance Pitfalls in model validation techniques (all types of risk, forecasting, pricing and rating)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信