Special issue introduction: utilitarian filmmaking in Australia 1945–80

IF 0.5 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION
Deane Williams, G. C. Russell, Mick Broderick
{"title":"Special issue introduction: utilitarian filmmaking in Australia 1945–80","authors":"Deane Williams, G. C. Russell, Mick Broderick","doi":"10.1080/17503280.2022.2066326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT While Australian cinema is generally defined by the feature filmmaking tradition, at least since the 1970s, ‘utilitarian filmmaking' represents a significant but barely visible portion of screen culture in Australia, a portion that has had an emphatic but unexamined influence on the media industries, education systems, industrial relations, research culture and national culture. Recent scholarly work undertaken internationally has shown how this vital strand of cultural and industrial history has often been overlooked; worse, it has often been expunged from cultural memory, either by critical neglect or through the destruction of archives previously deemed worthless by businesses and collecting-agencies. Given the insights and impacts of the latest studies of utilitarian filmmaking in the US and Europe, it is no exaggeration to propose that local, Australian holdings in the genre will come to be understood as a hitherto overlooked skein of ‘DNA’ in our national media systems. To study this heritage is to deepen our understanding of general/global and local/national characteristics of audiovisual culture and aesthetics as they operate in Australia, as well as to contribute in a major way to the burgeoning scholarship in international media archive research.This Introduction will focus on the manner in which ‘utilitarian cinema’ operates in relation to conceptions of Australian national cinema as well as to how this term can also contribute to formulations of transnational cinema. It will introduce the findings of this Australian Research Council funded research project being conducted by Ruby Arrowsmith-Todd, Stella Barber, Mick Broderick, Ross Gibson, John Hughes, Grace Russell and Deane Williams as well as introducing the case studies that were undertaken.","PeriodicalId":43545,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Documentary Film","volume":"16 1","pages":"193 - 203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Documentary Film","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17503280.2022.2066326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT While Australian cinema is generally defined by the feature filmmaking tradition, at least since the 1970s, ‘utilitarian filmmaking' represents a significant but barely visible portion of screen culture in Australia, a portion that has had an emphatic but unexamined influence on the media industries, education systems, industrial relations, research culture and national culture. Recent scholarly work undertaken internationally has shown how this vital strand of cultural and industrial history has often been overlooked; worse, it has often been expunged from cultural memory, either by critical neglect or through the destruction of archives previously deemed worthless by businesses and collecting-agencies. Given the insights and impacts of the latest studies of utilitarian filmmaking in the US and Europe, it is no exaggeration to propose that local, Australian holdings in the genre will come to be understood as a hitherto overlooked skein of ‘DNA’ in our national media systems. To study this heritage is to deepen our understanding of general/global and local/national characteristics of audiovisual culture and aesthetics as they operate in Australia, as well as to contribute in a major way to the burgeoning scholarship in international media archive research.This Introduction will focus on the manner in which ‘utilitarian cinema’ operates in relation to conceptions of Australian national cinema as well as to how this term can also contribute to formulations of transnational cinema. It will introduce the findings of this Australian Research Council funded research project being conducted by Ruby Arrowsmith-Todd, Stella Barber, Mick Broderick, Ross Gibson, John Hughes, Grace Russell and Deane Williams as well as introducing the case studies that were undertaken.
特刊导言:1945-80年澳大利亚的功利主义电影制作
虽然澳大利亚电影通常被定义为剧情片制作传统,但至少自20世纪70年代以来,“功利主义电影制作”代表了澳大利亚屏幕文化的一个重要但几乎不可见的部分,这一部分对媒体产业,教育系统,劳资关系,研究文化和民族文化产生了强烈但未经审查的影响。最近在国际上进行的学术研究表明,文化和工业历史的这一重要环节经常被忽视;更糟糕的是,它经常被从文化记忆中抹去,要么是由于批评的忽视,要么是由于以前被企业和收藏机构认为毫无价值的档案遭到破坏。考虑到美国和欧洲对功利主义电影制作的最新研究的见解和影响,可以毫不夸张地说,当地的澳大利亚人对这一类型的持有将被理解为我们国家媒体系统中迄今为止被忽视的“DNA”。研究这些遗产有助于加深我们对澳大利亚视听文化和美学的总体/全球和地方/民族特征的理解,并为国际媒体档案研究领域蓬勃发展的学术研究做出重要贡献。本导言将重点介绍“功利主义电影”在澳大利亚国家电影概念中的运作方式,以及这个术语如何也有助于跨国电影的制定。它将介绍由Ruby Arrowsmith-Todd、Stella Barber、Mick Broderick、Ross Gibson、John Hughes、Grace Russell和Deane Williams资助的澳大利亚研究委员会资助的研究项目的研究结果,并介绍所进行的案例研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studies in Documentary Film
Studies in Documentary Film FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Studies in Documentary Film is the first refereed scholarly journal devoted to the history, theory, criticism and practice of documentary film. In recent years we have witnessed an increased visibility for documentary film through conferences, the success of general theatrical releases and the re-emergence of scholarship in documentary film studies. Studies in Documentary Film is a peer-reviewed journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信