Antimicrobial use and suitability in long-term care facilities: A retrospective cross-sectional study

Q3 Medicine
JAMMI Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.3138/JAMMI.2018-0021
Carla Penney, S. Boyd, A. Mansfield, J. Dalton, J. O’Keefe, P. Daley
{"title":"Antimicrobial use and suitability in long-term care facilities: A retrospective cross-sectional study","authors":"Carla Penney, S. Boyd, A. Mansfield, J. Dalton, J. O’Keefe, P. Daley","doi":"10.3138/JAMMI.2018-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Antimicrobial stewardship is the promotion of responsible antimicrobial use to reduce antimicrobial resistance, antimicrobial toxicity and cost, and to reduce the incidence of nosocomial infections. Our objectives were to measure antibiotic use rate in 10 long-term care facilities (LTCF) during a 1-year period, and to determine the appropriateness of antimicrobial prescriptions. Methods: Antibiotic prescriptions from 10 long-term care facilities, between January 2015 and January 2016, were collected from a pharmacy database. A sample of500 prescriptions was randomly selected for chart review to determine the appropriateness of the prescribed antibiotic based on published guidelines. Results: We analyzed 3,148 prescriptions for 1,313 residents (2.40 prescriptions/patient/year, median duration 7 days). Antibiotic use rate was 21.16 Defined Daily Doses/1,000 patient-days/year, or 5.42 antibiotic days/1,000 patient-days/month. Of the 500 randomly selected prescriptions, 448 were analyzed for appropriateness. Mean age of included residents was 82.5 (SD 12.1 years). 288/448 (64.3%) were female, with an average activities of daily living (ADL) score of 19.3 (SD 8.5). Urinary tract infection was the most common indication for antibiotics (177/448, 39.5%), followed by lower respiratory tract infection (144/448, 32.1%) and skin and soft-tissue infection (76/448, 17.0%). 259/448 (57.8%) of prescriptions were inappropriate, including 115/163 (70.5%) given for urinary tract infection, 78/140 (55.7%) given for lower respiratory tract infection, and 15/68 (22.0%) given for skin and soft-tissue infection. Inappropriateness varied by long-term care facility (LTCF) between 18/41 (43.9%) and 15/21 (71.4%), and by drug class between 0/5 (0%) among penicillinase-resistant penicillins and 29/38 (76.3%) among macrolides. Conclusions: Antimicrobial use rate is high, and 57.8% of prescriptions are inappropriate. The least appropriate prescriptions are given for urinary tract infections. Appropriateness is highly variable by LTCF, indication, and drug class.","PeriodicalId":36782,"journal":{"name":"JAMMI","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMMI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/JAMMI.2018-0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial stewardship is the promotion of responsible antimicrobial use to reduce antimicrobial resistance, antimicrobial toxicity and cost, and to reduce the incidence of nosocomial infections. Our objectives were to measure antibiotic use rate in 10 long-term care facilities (LTCF) during a 1-year period, and to determine the appropriateness of antimicrobial prescriptions. Methods: Antibiotic prescriptions from 10 long-term care facilities, between January 2015 and January 2016, were collected from a pharmacy database. A sample of500 prescriptions was randomly selected for chart review to determine the appropriateness of the prescribed antibiotic based on published guidelines. Results: We analyzed 3,148 prescriptions for 1,313 residents (2.40 prescriptions/patient/year, median duration 7 days). Antibiotic use rate was 21.16 Defined Daily Doses/1,000 patient-days/year, or 5.42 antibiotic days/1,000 patient-days/month. Of the 500 randomly selected prescriptions, 448 were analyzed for appropriateness. Mean age of included residents was 82.5 (SD 12.1 years). 288/448 (64.3%) were female, with an average activities of daily living (ADL) score of 19.3 (SD 8.5). Urinary tract infection was the most common indication for antibiotics (177/448, 39.5%), followed by lower respiratory tract infection (144/448, 32.1%) and skin and soft-tissue infection (76/448, 17.0%). 259/448 (57.8%) of prescriptions were inappropriate, including 115/163 (70.5%) given for urinary tract infection, 78/140 (55.7%) given for lower respiratory tract infection, and 15/68 (22.0%) given for skin and soft-tissue infection. Inappropriateness varied by long-term care facility (LTCF) between 18/41 (43.9%) and 15/21 (71.4%), and by drug class between 0/5 (0%) among penicillinase-resistant penicillins and 29/38 (76.3%) among macrolides. Conclusions: Antimicrobial use rate is high, and 57.8% of prescriptions are inappropriate. The least appropriate prescriptions are given for urinary tract infections. Appropriateness is highly variable by LTCF, indication, and drug class.
长期护理机构抗菌药物的使用和适用性:一项回顾性横断面研究
背景:抗菌药物管理是促进负责任的抗菌药物使用,以减少抗菌药物耐药性、抗菌药物毒性和成本,并减少医院感染的发生率。我们的目标是测量10个长期护理机构(LTCF)在1年期间的抗生素使用率,并确定抗菌药物处方的适当性。方法:从药房数据库中收集2015年1月至2016年1月10家长期护理机构的抗生素处方。随机抽取500张处方样本进行图表审查,以根据已公布的指南确定处方抗生素的适当性。结果:我们分析了1,313名居民的3148张处方(2.40张处方/患者/年,中位持续时间7天)。抗生素使用率为21.16限定日剂量/ 1000患者日/年,或5.42抗生素日/ 1000患者日/月。在随机抽取的500张处方中,分析了448张处方的适宜性。纳入的居民平均年龄为82.5岁(SD 12.1岁)。女性288/448例(64.3%),平均日常生活活动(ADL)评分为19.3 (SD 8.5)。泌尿道感染是最常见的抗生素适应症(177/448,39.5%),其次是下呼吸道感染(144/448,32.1%)和皮肤软组织感染(76/448,17.0%)。其中,尿路感染用药占115/163(70.5%),下呼吸道感染用药占78/140(55.7%),皮肤及软组织感染用药占15/68(22.0%)。长期护理机构(LTCF)的不适宜性在18/41(43.9%)和15/21(71.4%)之间存在差异,耐青霉素青霉素类药物的不适宜性在0/5(0%)之间存在差异,大环内酯类药物的不适宜性在29/38(76.3%)之间存在差异。结论:该院抗菌药物使用率高,处方不合理占57.8%。最不合适的处方是给尿路感染。适当性因长期cf、适应症和药物类别而有很大差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMMI
JAMMI Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信