Competence or Dominance? A Quasi-Experimental Test of Sense of Control, Status, and Power

Q2 Social Sciences
Yujia Lyu, Alison J. Bianchi
{"title":"Competence or Dominance? A Quasi-Experimental Test of Sense of Control, Status, and Power","authors":"Yujia Lyu, Alison J. Bianchi","doi":"10.1080/00380237.2023.2199169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Sense of control has been conceived as an individual-level mechanism shaping the unequal distribution of life outcomes. Yet recent studies imply its potential to form interpersonal hierarchies through two distinct dimensions: status and power. As extant theorizing favors status processes over power dynamics, we investigated it as a status element using status characteristic theory and a modified standardized experimental situation. We successfully detected sense of control’s limited capacity to form status hierarchies. However, further analyses suggest that aspects of interactional power, instead of competence-based status generalization, explain more variance in the observed influence patterns. We conclude that the detected hierarchies may be power based, but another research design should test this possibility. We then discuss the implications of these thought-provoking outcomes.","PeriodicalId":39368,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Focus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2023.2199169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Sense of control has been conceived as an individual-level mechanism shaping the unequal distribution of life outcomes. Yet recent studies imply its potential to form interpersonal hierarchies through two distinct dimensions: status and power. As extant theorizing favors status processes over power dynamics, we investigated it as a status element using status characteristic theory and a modified standardized experimental situation. We successfully detected sense of control’s limited capacity to form status hierarchies. However, further analyses suggest that aspects of interactional power, instead of competence-based status generalization, explain more variance in the observed influence patterns. We conclude that the detected hierarchies may be power based, but another research design should test this possibility. We then discuss the implications of these thought-provoking outcomes.
能力还是支配?控制感、地位和权力的准实验测试
控制感被认为是一种个人层面的机制,形成了生活结果的不平等分配。然而,最近的研究表明,它有可能通过两个不同的维度形成人际等级:地位和权力。由于现存的理论倾向于地位过程而非权力动态,我们使用地位特征理论和修改的标准化实验情境将其作为一种地位因素进行了研究。我们成功地检测到控制感在形成状态层次结构方面的有限能力。然而,进一步的分析表明,互动权力的各个方面,而不是基于能力的地位概括,解释了观察到的影响模式的更多差异。我们得出的结论是,检测到的层次结构可能是基于权力的,但另一项研究设计应该测试这种可能性。然后,我们讨论这些发人深省的结果的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sociological Focus
Sociological Focus Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信