Using a quick timed-up-and-go test to predict surgical risk

Catherine L. Boereboom, Rachel B. McGuinness, Philip J. J. Herrod, James E. M. Blackwell, Tanvir S. Sian, Hannah Boyd-Carson, John P. Williams, Jonathan N. Lund, Bethan E. Phillips
{"title":"Using a quick timed-up-and-go test to predict surgical risk","authors":"Catherine L. Boereboom,&nbsp;Rachel B. McGuinness,&nbsp;Philip J. J. Herrod,&nbsp;James E. M. Blackwell,&nbsp;Tanvir S. Sian,&nbsp;Hannah Boyd-Carson,&nbsp;John P. Williams,&nbsp;Jonathan N. Lund,&nbsp;Bethan E. Phillips","doi":"10.1002/rco2.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) has important implications for post-operative recovery. The timed-up-and-go (TUG) test is a cheap and simple method to assess a patient's functional performance; although how well TUG correlates with results of a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), the gold standard measure of CRF is unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the correlation between CPET-derived parameters of CRF and TUG times in a group of older adults.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Ninety-eight independent community dwelling older adults [mean age: 72 years (range: 61–86), mean body mass index: 26.3 ± 3.1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, 54 male] were recruited to this study; completing 180 CPET and TUG testing sessions over a 28 month period. The correlation between CPET-derived CRF parameters and TUG time was assessed, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine clinically useful cut-off points in TUG time.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Median TUG time was 7.1 s [interquartile range (IQR): 4–8.5], median VO<sub>2</sub> peak was 24.4 mL/kg/min (IQR: 20.2–29.2), and the median anaerobic threshold (AT) was 13.4 mL/kg/min (IQR: 8.6–16.5). There was a statistically significant negative correlation between TUG time and AT (<i>r</i> = −0.317, <i>P</i> = &lt;0.0001) and TUG time and VO<sub>2</sub> peak (<i>r</i> = −0.4247, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis determined a TUG time of ≥6.5 s to have an 82% sensitivity and 60% specificity to detect an AT &lt;11.0 mL/kg/min, the point at below which perioperative mortality is known to increase.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Despite strong evidence for the utility of pre-operative CPET in stratifying surgical risk, CPET is not universally available. Our finding of a correlation between TUG time and CPET-derived parameters of CRF (AT/VO<sub>2</sub> peak) suggests that TUG may be a useful surrogate in the pre-operative setting.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73544,"journal":{"name":"JCSM rapid communications","volume":"4 2","pages":"159-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/rco2.36","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCSM rapid communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rco2.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background

Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) has important implications for post-operative recovery. The timed-up-and-go (TUG) test is a cheap and simple method to assess a patient's functional performance; although how well TUG correlates with results of a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), the gold standard measure of CRF is unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the correlation between CPET-derived parameters of CRF and TUG times in a group of older adults.

Methods

Ninety-eight independent community dwelling older adults [mean age: 72 years (range: 61–86), mean body mass index: 26.3 ± 3.1 kg/m2, 54 male] were recruited to this study; completing 180 CPET and TUG testing sessions over a 28 month period. The correlation between CPET-derived CRF parameters and TUG time was assessed, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine clinically useful cut-off points in TUG time.

Results

Median TUG time was 7.1 s [interquartile range (IQR): 4–8.5], median VO2 peak was 24.4 mL/kg/min (IQR: 20.2–29.2), and the median anaerobic threshold (AT) was 13.4 mL/kg/min (IQR: 8.6–16.5). There was a statistically significant negative correlation between TUG time and AT (r = −0.317, P = <0.0001) and TUG time and VO2 peak (r = −0.4247, P < 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis determined a TUG time of ≥6.5 s to have an 82% sensitivity and 60% specificity to detect an AT <11.0 mL/kg/min, the point at below which perioperative mortality is known to increase.

Conclusions

Despite strong evidence for the utility of pre-operative CPET in stratifying surgical risk, CPET is not universally available. Our finding of a correlation between TUG time and CPET-derived parameters of CRF (AT/VO2 peak) suggests that TUG may be a useful surrogate in the pre-operative setting.

Abstract Image

使用快速计时测试来预测手术风险
背景:心肺功能(CRF)对术后恢复具有重要意义。时间-up-and-go (TUG)测试是一种廉价而简单的评估患者功能表现的方法;尽管TUG与心肺运动试验(CPET)结果的相关性如何,但衡量CRF的金标准尚不清楚。因此,本研究的目的是评估一组老年人cpet衍生的CRF参数与TUG时间之间的相关性。方法98例独立社区居住老年人[平均年龄:72岁(范围:61 ~ 86岁),平均体重指数:26.3±3.1 kg/m2,男性54例];在28个月内完成180次CPET和TUG测试。评估cpet衍生的CRF参数与TUG时间之间的相关性,并进行受试者工作特征曲线分析,以确定TUG时间的临床有用截断点。结果TUG时间中位数为7.1 s[四分位间距(IQR): 4 ~ 8.5], VO2峰值中位数为24.4 mL/kg/min (IQR: 20.2 ~ 29.2),厌氧阈中位数(AT)为13.4 mL/kg/min (IQR: 8.6 ~ 16.5)。TUG时间与AT (r = - 0.317, P = <0.0001)、TUG时间与VO2峰(r = - 0.4247, P <0.0001)。受试者工作特征曲线分析确定,TUG时间≥6.5 s,检测AT < 11.0 mL/kg/min的灵敏度为82%,特异性为60%,低于此值围手术期死亡率已知会增加。结论:尽管有强有力的证据表明术前CPET在手术风险分层中的作用,但CPET并不是普遍可用的。我们发现TUG时间与cpet衍生的CRF参数(AT/VO2峰值)之间存在相关性,这表明TUG可能是术前一种有用的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信