Identity, Conflict and Discourse: Understanding Military Contestation in Brazil

IF 0.7 2区 历史学 Q2 AREA STUDIES
Ned Littlefield, Douglas Block
{"title":"Identity, Conflict and Discourse: Understanding Military Contestation in Brazil","authors":"Ned Littlefield, Douglas Block","doi":"10.1017/s0022216x23000664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Brazilian military has recently executed an unexpected return to politics by engaging more actively in domestic policymaking and implementation both before and during the Bolsonaro government, thus jeopardising democratic consolidation. To help understand this development, we examine why the military openly challenges civilian authority over some issues, while remaining silent on others. Whereas prior work emphasises external factors like civilians’ threats to military prerogatives, we argue that contestation of civilian authority stems in no small part from internal military conflict over how to utilise power. The military uses contestation to coordinate prerogatives with civilians and to communicate within the armed forces to increase cohesion. We illustrate this argument with case studies of military contestation surrounding political leadership selection and internal security, using the Army Commander's discourse via Twitter posts and public statements, plus key informant interviews and military publications.","PeriodicalId":51630,"journal":{"name":"拉丁美洲研究","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"拉丁美洲研究","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022216x23000664","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Brazilian military has recently executed an unexpected return to politics by engaging more actively in domestic policymaking and implementation both before and during the Bolsonaro government, thus jeopardising democratic consolidation. To help understand this development, we examine why the military openly challenges civilian authority over some issues, while remaining silent on others. Whereas prior work emphasises external factors like civilians’ threats to military prerogatives, we argue that contestation of civilian authority stems in no small part from internal military conflict over how to utilise power. The military uses contestation to coordinate prerogatives with civilians and to communicate within the armed forces to increase cohesion. We illustrate this argument with case studies of military contestation surrounding political leadership selection and internal security, using the Army Commander's discourse via Twitter posts and public statements, plus key informant interviews and military publications.
认同、冲突与话语:对巴西军事冲突的理解
巴西军方最近出人意料地重返政坛,在博索纳罗政府执政之前和执政期间更积极地参与国内政策制定和实施,从而危及民主巩固。为了帮助理解这一事态发展,我们研究了为什么军方在某些问题上公开挑战文官权威,而在其他问题上保持沉默。尽管先前的工作强调了外部因素,如平民对军事特权的威胁,但我们认为,对文官权力的争夺在很大程度上源于如何利用权力的内部军事冲突。军方利用争夺来协调与平民的特权,并在武装部队内部进行沟通,以增强凝聚力。我们通过围绕政治领导层选择和内部安全的军事争论的案例研究来说明这一论点,使用陆军指挥官通过推特帖子和公开声明的话语,以及关键线人的采访和军事出版物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
拉丁美洲研究
拉丁美洲研究 Multiple-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3870
期刊介绍: Journal of Latin American Studies presents recent research in the field of Latin American studies in economics, geography, politics, international relations, sociology, social anthropology, economic history and cultural history. Regular features include articles on contemporary themes, specially commissioned commentaries and an extensive section of book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信