1964 Tokyo Olympics as Post-War

IF 1.7 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Shunya Yoshimi
{"title":"1964 Tokyo Olympics as Post-War","authors":"Shunya Yoshimi","doi":"10.1111/ijjs.12090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This is an analysis of the historical continuity of the military-cultural spatial formation of the Tokyo Olympic Games throughout the prewar and postwar era. The sites that eventually became the basis for hosting the 1964 and 2020 Olympics had already materialized in the plan for the 1940 Olympics. Tokyo's modernization process entailed a shift of the city's core from the rich cultural heritage accumulated since the Edo in the city's northeast towards an area extending from the southwest of the city center into the suburbs. The northeast area of central Tokyo had been home to commoner districts since the Edo period, and with land that was highly subdivided, did not lend itself to large-scale development. But the southwest of the city center was originally the site of feudal estates, and these large sites were generally amenable to large-scale development. These areas were home to numerous Imperial Japanese Army bases before the surrender, which after seizure during the US occupation eventually became the footprint for large parks and urban developments. The 1964 Olympics played a determinative role in the developments of the southwest of the city center. This continuity from prewar to postwar planning is reflected in the similar placement of venues, and the their conversion from former military uses. So the Olympics came to postwar Japan as a <i>postwar</i> event, in the strict sense of the word. The term postwar here refers foremost to the strategy of converting the social consciousness from war that accompanied reconstruction and economic growth.</p>","PeriodicalId":29652,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Sociology","volume":"28 1","pages":"80-95"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/ijjs.12090","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijjs.12090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This is an analysis of the historical continuity of the military-cultural spatial formation of the Tokyo Olympic Games throughout the prewar and postwar era. The sites that eventually became the basis for hosting the 1964 and 2020 Olympics had already materialized in the plan for the 1940 Olympics. Tokyo's modernization process entailed a shift of the city's core from the rich cultural heritage accumulated since the Edo in the city's northeast towards an area extending from the southwest of the city center into the suburbs. The northeast area of central Tokyo had been home to commoner districts since the Edo period, and with land that was highly subdivided, did not lend itself to large-scale development. But the southwest of the city center was originally the site of feudal estates, and these large sites were generally amenable to large-scale development. These areas were home to numerous Imperial Japanese Army bases before the surrender, which after seizure during the US occupation eventually became the footprint for large parks and urban developments. The 1964 Olympics played a determinative role in the developments of the southwest of the city center. This continuity from prewar to postwar planning is reflected in the similar placement of venues, and the their conversion from former military uses. So the Olympics came to postwar Japan as a postwar event, in the strict sense of the word. The term postwar here refers foremost to the strategy of converting the social consciousness from war that accompanied reconstruction and economic growth.

1964年东京奥运会
这是对东京奥运会在战前和战后时期军事文化空间形成的历史连续性的分析。最终成为1964年和2020年奥运会举办地的场地在1940年奥运会的计划中已经具体化。东京的现代化进程涉及城市核心的转变,从城市东北部江户时代以来积累的丰富文化遗产,到从市中心西南部延伸到郊区的地区。自江户时代以来,东京市中心的东北地区一直是平民地区的所在地,土地高度细分,不适合大规模开发。但市中心的西南部原本是封建庄园的所在地,这些大型遗址通常适合大规模开发。这些地区在投降前是众多日本帝国陆军基地的所在地,在美国占领期间被占领后,最终成为大型公园和城市发展的足迹。1964年的奥运会对市中心西南地区的发展起到了决定性的作用。这种从战前到战后规划的连续性反映在场地的相似位置上,以及它们从以前的军事用途转换而来。所以奥运会来到战后的日本是作为战后的一项赛事,严格意义上来说。“战后”一词在这里主要指的是伴随重建和经济增长而转变社会意识的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信