Emergence of Palestine as a Global Cause

IF 0.8 3区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES
Sune Haugbolle, Pelle Valentin Olsen
{"title":"Emergence of Palestine as a Global Cause","authors":"Sune Haugbolle, Pelle Valentin Olsen","doi":"10.1080/19436149.2023.2168379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the late 1960s, Palestine became an iconic signifier of solidarity and support for the Left, but also a transgressive tool that shaped and re-situated ideological positions at domestic levels. In this article, we attempt to answer why, how, and when this happened. Most research to date has stressed the global diplomatic offensive by the PLO (Palestine Liberation Organization). Palestinian revolutionary thought and action are obviously the primary explanatory factors for the emergence of their cause internationally. However, a one-sided approach blurs the agency of the global revolutionaries and solidarity activists who helped elevate Palestine to a global cause. This article takes a comparative approach and uses Denmark and Norway as two illustrative examples of Palestine’s transformation into a global leftist cause. Denmark and Norway are central cases because solidarity movements in Scandinavia developed early on, and because they exemplify how Fatah, in Norway, and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), in Denmark, advanced different models of solidarity and cultural diplomacy. We compare these two cases with new evidence from other countries in order to summarize how a cultural transfer of symbols, interpretations, experiences, and ideological positioning took place in the 1960s and 1970s through meetings, translations, and organizational links.","PeriodicalId":44822,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Critique","volume":"32 1","pages":"129 - 148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Critique","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19436149.2023.2168379","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In the late 1960s, Palestine became an iconic signifier of solidarity and support for the Left, but also a transgressive tool that shaped and re-situated ideological positions at domestic levels. In this article, we attempt to answer why, how, and when this happened. Most research to date has stressed the global diplomatic offensive by the PLO (Palestine Liberation Organization). Palestinian revolutionary thought and action are obviously the primary explanatory factors for the emergence of their cause internationally. However, a one-sided approach blurs the agency of the global revolutionaries and solidarity activists who helped elevate Palestine to a global cause. This article takes a comparative approach and uses Denmark and Norway as two illustrative examples of Palestine’s transformation into a global leftist cause. Denmark and Norway are central cases because solidarity movements in Scandinavia developed early on, and because they exemplify how Fatah, in Norway, and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), in Denmark, advanced different models of solidarity and cultural diplomacy. We compare these two cases with new evidence from other countries in order to summarize how a cultural transfer of symbols, interpretations, experiences, and ideological positioning took place in the 1960s and 1970s through meetings, translations, and organizational links.
巴勒斯坦作为一项全球性事业的出现
在20世纪60年代末,巴勒斯坦成为团结和支持左派的标志性象征,但也是在国内层面塑造和重新定位意识形态立场的越界工具。在本文中,我们试图回答这种情况发生的原因、方式和时间。迄今为止,大多数研究都强调巴解组织(巴勒斯坦解放组织)的全球外交攻势。巴勒斯坦的革命思想和行动显然是其事业在国际上出现的主要解释因素。然而,片面的做法模糊了全球革命者和团结活动家的作用,他们帮助将巴勒斯坦提升为全球事业。本文采用比较的方法,并以丹麦和挪威作为巴勒斯坦转变为全球左派事业的两个例证。丹麦和挪威是中心案例,因为斯堪的纳维亚的团结运动发展得较早,因为他们是挪威的法塔赫和丹麦的解放巴勒斯坦人民阵线(PFLP)如何推进不同的团结和文化外交模式的典范。我们将这两个案例与其他国家的新证据进行比较,以总结符号、解释、经验和意识形态定位的文化转移是如何在20世纪60年代和70年代通过会议、翻译和组织联系发生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Middle East Critique
Middle East Critique AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信