“It’s not even the leaders out here who have any say at all in how long they’re gonna have to wait”: A study of waiting time, power, and acceptance

IF 2.2 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
L. S. Hansen
{"title":"“It’s not even the leaders out here who have any say at all in how long they’re gonna have to wait”: A study of waiting time, power, and acceptance","authors":"L. S. Hansen","doi":"10.1177/0961463X20950983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Waiting time is an exercise of power. When citizens such as welfare clients, asylum seekers, or inmates encounter the state, they experience lengthy waiting time. Their cases are often delayed; their appointments are postponed or canceled. This creates uncertainty, and studies on the lived experiences of waiting time show that this makes citizens accept that they have to wait. In this study, I argue that citizens accept that they have to wait because they believe that frontline workers have no power to reduce waiting time. I explore this through an ethnographic study of citizens on social assistance at an activation site in Denmark where they perform labor to receive their benefits. The study makes three contributions to the existing scholarship on waiting time. First, it combines observations of both frontline workers’ decisions about waiting time and how citizens experience these decisions. I explore how the frontline workers make citizens wait to perform labor and leave at the end of the day. The length of waiting changes daily, and citizens are rarely informed about how long they have to wait. I observe that citizens accept the waiting time even though they associate it with frustration, demotivation, and uncertainty. Second, what engenders this acceptance is the frontline workers’ tendency to deflect “blame away” from their power to impose waiting time. When they justify their decisions, they deflect blame either “upwards” (toward the rules or their management) or “downwards” (toward troublesome citizens). Third, the study shows that waiting time do not only reflect structural asymmetries between the citizens and the frontline workers. Citizens accept that they have to wait, because they build trust with the frontline workers and believe that the reduction of waiting time is beyond their control. This shows that the power of waiting time is also relationally produced.","PeriodicalId":47347,"journal":{"name":"Time & Society","volume":"29 1","pages":"1128 - 1149"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0961463X20950983","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Time & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X20950983","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Waiting time is an exercise of power. When citizens such as welfare clients, asylum seekers, or inmates encounter the state, they experience lengthy waiting time. Their cases are often delayed; their appointments are postponed or canceled. This creates uncertainty, and studies on the lived experiences of waiting time show that this makes citizens accept that they have to wait. In this study, I argue that citizens accept that they have to wait because they believe that frontline workers have no power to reduce waiting time. I explore this through an ethnographic study of citizens on social assistance at an activation site in Denmark where they perform labor to receive their benefits. The study makes three contributions to the existing scholarship on waiting time. First, it combines observations of both frontline workers’ decisions about waiting time and how citizens experience these decisions. I explore how the frontline workers make citizens wait to perform labor and leave at the end of the day. The length of waiting changes daily, and citizens are rarely informed about how long they have to wait. I observe that citizens accept the waiting time even though they associate it with frustration, demotivation, and uncertainty. Second, what engenders this acceptance is the frontline workers’ tendency to deflect “blame away” from their power to impose waiting time. When they justify their decisions, they deflect blame either “upwards” (toward the rules or their management) or “downwards” (toward troublesome citizens). Third, the study shows that waiting time do not only reflect structural asymmetries between the citizens and the frontline workers. Citizens accept that they have to wait, because they build trust with the frontline workers and believe that the reduction of waiting time is beyond their control. This shows that the power of waiting time is also relationally produced.
“甚至连这里的领导人都没有发言权决定他们要等多久”:对等待时间、权力和接受度的研究
等待时间是一种权力的行使。当福利客户、寻求庇护者或囚犯等公民遇到该州时,他们会经历漫长的等待时间。他们的案件往往被拖延;他们的约会被推迟或取消。这造成了不确定性,对等待时间的生活经历的研究表明,这使公民接受他们必须等待。在这项研究中,我认为公民接受他们必须等待,因为他们认为一线工作人员没有能力减少等待时间。我通过一项民族志研究来探讨这个问题,研究对象是在丹麦的一个活动地点接受社会援助的公民,他们在那里劳动以获得福利。本研究对现有的等待时间研究做出了三个贡献。首先,它结合了对一线工作人员关于等待时间的决定以及市民如何体验这些决定的观察。我探索了一线工人是如何让市民等待完成劳动并在一天结束时离开的。等待的时间每天都在变化,市民很少被告知他们要等待多长时间。我观察到市民接受等待时间,即使他们把它与沮丧、失去动力和不确定性联系在一起。其次,导致这种接受的原因是一线员工倾向于把“责任”从他们施加等待时间的权力上转移开。当他们为自己的决定辩护时,他们将责任转移到“向上”(对规则或他们的管理)或“向下”(对麻烦的公民)。第三,研究表明,等待时间不仅反映了公民与一线工作人员之间的结构性不对称。市民接受他们必须等待,因为他们与前线工作人员建立了信任,并相信减少等待时间是他们无法控制的。这表明,等待时间的力量也是相关产生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Time & Society
Time & Society SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Time & Society publishes articles, reviews, and scholarly comment discussing the workings of time and temporality across a range of disciplines, including anthropology, geography, history, psychology, and sociology. Work focuses on methodological and theoretical problems, including the use of time in organizational contexts. You"ll also find critiques of and proposals for time-related changes in the formation of public, social, economic, and organizational policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信