{"title":"Communication consulting and outreach","authors":"San Bolkan, Darrin J. Griffin","doi":"10.1080/03634523.2022.2137220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consultants operate as translators who cull relevant literature to produce lessons as these pertain to skills, strategies, and ideas that practitioners can apply in professional contexts (Waldeck, 2016). Having said that, our impression is that contributors to Communication Education are well positioned to provide practical advice about communicating with others, though this might not seem apparent at first. As such, we believe that our charge as communication professionals is to reframe how we think about what we know and to convince others that our scholarly focus includes more than just studying the basics of how people talk to each other. Our first charge as communication professionals is to reframe our own understanding of what we do. At its core, the topics published in Communication Education center on processes of human learning, including understanding how people pay attention, organize complex information, and retain knowledge for use (Mayer, 2021). Thus, instead of seeing ourselves as researchers who focus on students’ classroom experiences, we might also envision ourselves as scholars who investigate how best to facilitate human information processing and recall. From this perspective, conclusions generated from our research apply to just about any professional endeavor. Don’t believe us? Try speaking in public without knowing what it takes to capture a person’s attention, try negotiating a business deal without understanding how to be clear when communicating your needs, or try inspiring a workforce without understanding how different types of motivation influence effort. The fundamental idea in each of these examples is studied in the context of instructional communication, and although we typically focus on learning interventions, these notions are valuable beyond the classroom. Our second charge as communication professionals is twofold and includes helping others understand that our scholarly focus includes more than the basics of communicating with others and convincing organizations that they stand to benefit from our work. Regarding the former, we are often surprised that the details of what we research are entirely new to the people we interact with—even for the educators and trainers with whom we collaborate. Most people know little about the nuance in what we study, and so they fail to comprehend how the knowledge we have generated can be helpful in their professional endeavors. For instance, many professional speakers are familiar with the importance of clarity, but they are unaware that the concept is multidimensional and manifests through a core set of specific behaviors (Bolkan, 2017). Relatedly, though most professional educators have thought about what they are going to teach from the","PeriodicalId":47722,"journal":{"name":"COMMUNICATION EDUCATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMMUNICATION EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2022.2137220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Consultants operate as translators who cull relevant literature to produce lessons as these pertain to skills, strategies, and ideas that practitioners can apply in professional contexts (Waldeck, 2016). Having said that, our impression is that contributors to Communication Education are well positioned to provide practical advice about communicating with others, though this might not seem apparent at first. As such, we believe that our charge as communication professionals is to reframe how we think about what we know and to convince others that our scholarly focus includes more than just studying the basics of how people talk to each other. Our first charge as communication professionals is to reframe our own understanding of what we do. At its core, the topics published in Communication Education center on processes of human learning, including understanding how people pay attention, organize complex information, and retain knowledge for use (Mayer, 2021). Thus, instead of seeing ourselves as researchers who focus on students’ classroom experiences, we might also envision ourselves as scholars who investigate how best to facilitate human information processing and recall. From this perspective, conclusions generated from our research apply to just about any professional endeavor. Don’t believe us? Try speaking in public without knowing what it takes to capture a person’s attention, try negotiating a business deal without understanding how to be clear when communicating your needs, or try inspiring a workforce without understanding how different types of motivation influence effort. The fundamental idea in each of these examples is studied in the context of instructional communication, and although we typically focus on learning interventions, these notions are valuable beyond the classroom. Our second charge as communication professionals is twofold and includes helping others understand that our scholarly focus includes more than the basics of communicating with others and convincing organizations that they stand to benefit from our work. Regarding the former, we are often surprised that the details of what we research are entirely new to the people we interact with—even for the educators and trainers with whom we collaborate. Most people know little about the nuance in what we study, and so they fail to comprehend how the knowledge we have generated can be helpful in their professional endeavors. For instance, many professional speakers are familiar with the importance of clarity, but they are unaware that the concept is multidimensional and manifests through a core set of specific behaviors (Bolkan, 2017). Relatedly, though most professional educators have thought about what they are going to teach from the
期刊介绍:
Communication Education is a peer-reviewed publication of the National Communication Association. Communication Education publishes original scholarship that advances understanding of the role of communication in the teaching and learning process in diverse spaces, structures, and interactions, within and outside of academia. Communication Education welcomes scholarship from diverse perspectives and methodologies, including quantitative, qualitative, and critical/textual approaches. All submissions must be methodologically rigorous and theoretically grounded and geared toward advancing knowledge production in communication, teaching, and learning. Scholarship in Communication Education addresses the intersections of communication, teaching, and learning related to topics and contexts that include but are not limited to: • student/teacher relationships • student/teacher characteristics • student/teacher identity construction • student learning outcomes • student engagement • diversity, inclusion, and difference • social justice • instructional technology/social media • the basic communication course • service learning • communication across the curriculum • communication instruction in business and the professions • communication instruction in civic arenas In addition to articles, the journal will publish occasional scholarly exchanges on topics related to communication, teaching, and learning, such as: • Analytic review articles: agenda-setting pieces including examinations of key questions about the field • Forum essays: themed pieces for dialogue or debate on current communication, teaching, and learning issues