Narrative Policy Framework: Presidential Threshold Policy Toward the 2024 Election

Akhdiva Elfi Istiqoh, Zuly Qodir, Zakly Hanafi Ahmad
{"title":"Narrative Policy Framework: Presidential Threshold Policy Toward the 2024 Election","authors":"Akhdiva Elfi Istiqoh, Zuly Qodir, Zakly Hanafi Ahmad","doi":"10.21787/jbp.14.2022.505-516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"General elections are interpreted as a concrete manifestation of the implementation of democracy in Indonesia. However, the use of the Presidential Threshold is a matter of debate ahead of the 2024 General Election. The issue related to the Presidential Threshold has become a hot issue reported by the Indonesian media. The media have an essential role in shaping public narratives related to policymaking. The part of public records can create collective awareness by providing information about actors' choices in making a policy decision. This study aims to analyze how policymaking actors in Indonesia make decisions regarding using the Presidential Threshold in the 2024 General Election seen from the public narrative formed in the media. A Narrative Policy Framework (NPF) study will be conducted to describe and explain the structure of political narratives in policymaking. This study uses a qualitative research method with a QDAS (Qualitative Data Analysis Software) approach. The data sources in this study came from reputable online media in Indonesia. Research findings show that the government's attitude toward the House of People's Representatives (DPR) as policymakers does not waver towards implementing the 20% Presidential Threshold in the upcoming 2024 elections. However, the narrative built on the media regarding implementing the Presidential Threshold is more dominated by the contrast. This is inseparable from the political interest ahead of the 2024 general election. Namely, to carry and win presidential and vice-presidential candidates who are supported by each political actor involved.","PeriodicalId":52606,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Bina Praja","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Bina Praja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.505-516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

General elections are interpreted as a concrete manifestation of the implementation of democracy in Indonesia. However, the use of the Presidential Threshold is a matter of debate ahead of the 2024 General Election. The issue related to the Presidential Threshold has become a hot issue reported by the Indonesian media. The media have an essential role in shaping public narratives related to policymaking. The part of public records can create collective awareness by providing information about actors' choices in making a policy decision. This study aims to analyze how policymaking actors in Indonesia make decisions regarding using the Presidential Threshold in the 2024 General Election seen from the public narrative formed in the media. A Narrative Policy Framework (NPF) study will be conducted to describe and explain the structure of political narratives in policymaking. This study uses a qualitative research method with a QDAS (Qualitative Data Analysis Software) approach. The data sources in this study came from reputable online media in Indonesia. Research findings show that the government's attitude toward the House of People's Representatives (DPR) as policymakers does not waver towards implementing the 20% Presidential Threshold in the upcoming 2024 elections. However, the narrative built on the media regarding implementing the Presidential Threshold is more dominated by the contrast. This is inseparable from the political interest ahead of the 2024 general election. Namely, to carry and win presidential and vice-presidential candidates who are supported by each political actor involved.
叙述性政策框架:2024年大选的总统门槛政策
大选被解释为印度尼西亚实行民主的具体表现。然而,总统门槛的使用是2024年大选前的一个争论问题。总统门槛问题已成为印尼媒体报道的热点问题。媒体在塑造与政策制定相关的公共叙事方面发挥着至关重要的作用。公共记录的一部分可以通过提供有关行为者在决策中的选择的信息来创造集体意识。本研究旨在从媒体形成的公共叙事中分析印尼决策者如何在2024年大选中使用总统门槛做出决定。将进行叙事政策框架(NPF)研究,以描述和解释决策中政治叙事的结构。本研究采用定性研究方法和QDAS(定性数据分析软件)方法。这项研究的数据来源于印尼知名的网络媒体。研究结果表明,作为政策制定者,政府对人民代表院(DPR)的态度并没有动摇,在即将到来的2024年选举中实施20%的总统门槛。然而,建立在媒体上的关于实施总统门槛的叙事更多地被这种对比所主导。这与2024年大选前的政治利益密不可分。也就是说,支持并赢得每一位政治参与者支持的总统和副总统候选人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信