{"title":"Eye and Skin Differences between Atelognathus patagonicus Morphotypes: Two Environments, Two Strategies (Anura; Batrachylidae)","authors":"Clara Volonteri, G. Hermida, N. Basso","doi":"10.1670/20-081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The adults of the frog Atelognathus patagonicus display phenotypic plasticity and two morphotypes, namely, “aquatic” and “littoral”, and the transition from one to the other is a reversible way of adapting to different environments. The aquatic form lives underwater associated with vegetation and rocks and has lateral skin folds and interdigital membranes. Otherwise, the littoral form lives up to a few kilometers away from the water and does not have bagginess and the interdigital membranes are reduced. Considering that morphology and function of the visual system and skin composition are characters highly associated with habitat conditions, we performed a histological comparison of the eye and skin of both aquatic and littoral morphotypes of A. patagonicus. The aquatic morphotype A. patagonicus does not have an evident character that improves vision underwater, suggesting that clues for subaquatic life could not be only visual. However, the eyelid of the littoral morph has more mucous glands than that of the aquatic morph, which is consistent with the mucus secretion of these glands and its association with terrestrial environments. Also, the skin littoral morph is more keratinized and thicker than the aquatic one, which helps to prevent desiccation. Finally, the lateral skin of the aquatic morph is highly vascularized, suggesting an increase in cutaneous respiration. This work is a starting point for understanding, in an integrative way, the different mechanisms and systems modifications in the water–land transition of A. patagonicus.","PeriodicalId":54821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Herpetology","volume":"56 1","pages":"99 - 109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Herpetology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1670/20-081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Abstract. The adults of the frog Atelognathus patagonicus display phenotypic plasticity and two morphotypes, namely, “aquatic” and “littoral”, and the transition from one to the other is a reversible way of adapting to different environments. The aquatic form lives underwater associated with vegetation and rocks and has lateral skin folds and interdigital membranes. Otherwise, the littoral form lives up to a few kilometers away from the water and does not have bagginess and the interdigital membranes are reduced. Considering that morphology and function of the visual system and skin composition are characters highly associated with habitat conditions, we performed a histological comparison of the eye and skin of both aquatic and littoral morphotypes of A. patagonicus. The aquatic morphotype A. patagonicus does not have an evident character that improves vision underwater, suggesting that clues for subaquatic life could not be only visual. However, the eyelid of the littoral morph has more mucous glands than that of the aquatic morph, which is consistent with the mucus secretion of these glands and its association with terrestrial environments. Also, the skin littoral morph is more keratinized and thicker than the aquatic one, which helps to prevent desiccation. Finally, the lateral skin of the aquatic morph is highly vascularized, suggesting an increase in cutaneous respiration. This work is a starting point for understanding, in an integrative way, the different mechanisms and systems modifications in the water–land transition of A. patagonicus.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Herpetology accepts manuscripts on all aspects on the biology of amphibians and reptiles including their behavior, conservation, ecology, morphology, physiology, and systematics, as well as herpetological education. We encourage authors to submit manuscripts that are data-driven and rigorous tests of hypotheses, or provide thorough descriptions of novel taxa (living or fossil). Topics may address theoretical issues in a thoughtful, quantitative way. Reviews and policy papers that provide new insight on the herpetological sciences are also welcome, but they must be more than simple literature reviews. These papers must have a central focus that propose a new argument for understanding a concept or a new approach for answering a question or solving a problem. Focus sections that combine papers on related topics are normally determined by the Editors. Publication in the Long-Term Perspectives section is by invitation only. Papers on captive breeding, new techniques or sampling methods, anecdotal or isolated natural history observations, geographic range extensions, and essays should be submitted to our sister journal, Herpetological Review.