Stability and Clinical Outcomes of Angle Fracture Fixation Using Sagittal Split Plate (SSOP) Versus Two Miniplates: Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 0.8 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-16 DOI:10.1007/s12663-022-01817-z
Hagar M El-Sherif, Sherif Ali, Mostafa Talaat, Fahmy Mubarak
{"title":"Stability and Clinical Outcomes of Angle Fracture Fixation Using Sagittal Split Plate (SSOP) Versus Two Miniplates: Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Hagar M El-Sherif, Sherif Ali, Mostafa Talaat, Fahmy Mubarak","doi":"10.1007/s12663-022-01817-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to compare the stability and clinical outcomes between the two miniplates and sagittal split plate (SSOP) in angle fracture fixation. Thirty-eight patients with a mandibular angle fracture were selected and divided randomly into two groups. Intervention was treated with SSOP, and the control group was treated with conventional two miniplates. Clinical evaluation included occlusion, edema, nerve affection, wound dehiscence and mouth opening. Radiographic parameters included the measurement of inter-ramus distance, inter-mental distance and bone density. All clinical parameters were evaluated at one week, one month and three months intervals. Radiographic parameters were evaluated immediately postoperative, and after three months. Results showed that SSOP had less postoperative complications (10.50%) than the two miniplates (31.60%). It can be concluded that both methods offered high performance in management of mandibular angle fractures. However, SSOP group had a significantly shorter operating time, increased bone density and less edema. <i>Clinical trial registration number</i>: NCT03839368.</p>","PeriodicalId":47495,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10830940/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-022-01817-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the stability and clinical outcomes between the two miniplates and sagittal split plate (SSOP) in angle fracture fixation. Thirty-eight patients with a mandibular angle fracture were selected and divided randomly into two groups. Intervention was treated with SSOP, and the control group was treated with conventional two miniplates. Clinical evaluation included occlusion, edema, nerve affection, wound dehiscence and mouth opening. Radiographic parameters included the measurement of inter-ramus distance, inter-mental distance and bone density. All clinical parameters were evaluated at one week, one month and three months intervals. Radiographic parameters were evaluated immediately postoperative, and after three months. Results showed that SSOP had less postoperative complications (10.50%) than the two miniplates (31.60%). It can be concluded that both methods offered high performance in management of mandibular angle fractures. However, SSOP group had a significantly shorter operating time, increased bone density and less edema. Clinical trial registration number: NCT03839368.

矢状劈开钢板(SSOP)与两个微型钢板固定角度骨折的稳定性和临床结果:随机临床试验
本研究旨在比较两种微型钢板和矢状劈开钢板(SSOP)在角骨折固定中的稳定性和临床效果。研究选取了 38 名下颌角骨折患者,将其随机分为两组。干预组采用 SSOP 治疗,对照组采用传统的双小钢板治疗。临床评估包括咬合、水肿、神经损伤、伤口裂开和张口情况。放射学参数包括椎间距、牙间距和骨密度的测量。所有临床参数分别在一周、一个月和三个月时进行评估。术后即刻和三个月后对放射学参数进行评估。结果显示,SSOP 的术后并发症(10.50%)少于两种迷你板(31.60%)。由此可以得出结论,这两种方法在治疗下颌角骨折方面都有很好的效果。不过,SSOP 组的手术时间明显更短、骨密度更高且水肿更少。临床试验注册号:NCT03839368:NCT03839368。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery
Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
138
期刊介绍: This journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Practice-applicable articles help develop the methods used to handle dentoalveolar surgery, facial injuries and deformities, TMJ disorders, oral cancer, jaw reconstruction, anesthesia and analgesia. The journal also includes specifics on new instruments, diagnostic equipment’s and modern therapeutic drugs and devices. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is recommended for first or priority subscription by the Dental Section of the Medical Library Association. Specific topics covered recently have included: ? distraction osteogenesis ? synthetic bone substitutes ? fibroblast growth factors ? fetal wound healing ? skull base surgery ? computer-assisted surgery ? vascularized bone grafts Benefits to authorsWe also provide many author benefits, such as free PDFs, a liberal copyright policy, special discounts on Elsevier publications and much more. Please click here for more information on our author services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信