Resiliency from violent victimization for people with mental disorders: An examination of multiple resiliency models

IF 1.5 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Michelle N. Harris, L. Daigle
{"title":"Resiliency from violent victimization for people with mental disorders: An examination of multiple resiliency models","authors":"Michelle N. Harris, L. Daigle","doi":"10.1177/02697580221141105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research examining prevalence rates and risk factors related to victimization for people with mental disorders has procured considerable attention. Despite this increased attention, why a subset of this population is not victimized, despite elevated risk, is less understood. That is, there is a group of people with mental disorders who are effectively resilient from victimization, but the ways in which resiliency is produced is not known. Using the National Comorbidity Study–Adolescent supplement data, the applicability of numerous resiliency models is examined to identify and understand how the resiliency from victimization process operates for people with mental disorders. Building off previous work, factors specific to mental illness are also included in additional models to examine whether the same factors relate to resiliency for people with mental illness as they do for other samples. Results indicate support for the compensatory and protective-protective resilience models when mental health-specific factors are excluded from the analyses. Results change, however, when mental health-specific variables are included in the analyses, suggesting the need for continued research on resiliency for this population.","PeriodicalId":45622,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Victimology","volume":"29 1","pages":"420 - 448"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Victimology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02697580221141105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Research examining prevalence rates and risk factors related to victimization for people with mental disorders has procured considerable attention. Despite this increased attention, why a subset of this population is not victimized, despite elevated risk, is less understood. That is, there is a group of people with mental disorders who are effectively resilient from victimization, but the ways in which resiliency is produced is not known. Using the National Comorbidity Study–Adolescent supplement data, the applicability of numerous resiliency models is examined to identify and understand how the resiliency from victimization process operates for people with mental disorders. Building off previous work, factors specific to mental illness are also included in additional models to examine whether the same factors relate to resiliency for people with mental illness as they do for other samples. Results indicate support for the compensatory and protective-protective resilience models when mental health-specific factors are excluded from the analyses. Results change, however, when mental health-specific variables are included in the analyses, suggesting the need for continued research on resiliency for this population.
精神障碍患者免受暴力侵害的复原力:对多种复原力模型的检验
调查精神障碍患者的患病率和与受害有关的风险因素的研究引起了相当大的关注。尽管受到了越来越多的关注,但为什么这些人群中的一部分人尽管风险较高,但却没有成为受害者,这一点却鲜为人知。也就是说,有一群患有精神障碍的人能够有效地从受害中恢复过来,但恢复能力的产生方式尚不清楚。使用国家共病研究-青少年补充数据,许多弹性模型的适用性进行了检查,以确定和理解如何从受害过程中恢复精神障碍患者的运作。在先前工作的基础上,针对精神疾病的特定因素也被纳入其他模型,以检查与其他样本相同的因素是否与精神疾病患者的弹性有关。结果表明,当心理健康特定因素被排除在分析之外时,补偿和保护-保护弹性模型得到支持。然而,当分析中包含心理健康特定变量时,结果会发生变化,这表明需要继续研究这一人群的弹性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Review of Victimology
International Review of Victimology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信