Identity statuses across various life domains and well-being in emerging adults

Q4 Psychology
D. Karaś, Jan Cieciuch
{"title":"Identity statuses across various life domains and well-being in emerging adults","authors":"D. Karaś, Jan Cieciuch","doi":"10.24425/ppb.2019.130694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to examine identity statuses in various life domains and the relationship between \nidentity and well-being. We adopted the three-dimensional model of identity (Crocetti et al., 2008), including: in-depth \nexploration, commitment, and reconsideration of commitment. Moreover, in accordance with domain-specific approach \n(Goossens, 2001), we sought to empirically derive identity statuses in various life domains. \nThe participants included 835 emerging adults (Mage = 21.81, SD = 2.33). We examined eight domains previously \nidentified in qualitative research: personality characteristics, past experiences, family, friends and acquaintances, \nworldview, hobbies and interests, aims and plans for the future, and occupation. To measure three identity processes, we used a modified version of the Utrecht-Management of Identity Commitments Scale (Crocetti et al., 2008) and to measure well-being we used the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (Keyes, 2013). \nResults indicate that, although the statuses identified in previous research were, to a large extent, replicated (except \nmoratorium), people were classified in different statuses in different domains; thus, we conclude that talking about statuses should be limited to a given domain. Well-being was the highest in achievement statuses and the lowest in diffusion, but only in two examined domains: personality characteristics and past experience.","PeriodicalId":38657,"journal":{"name":"Polish Psychological Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Psychological Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24425/ppb.2019.130694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to examine identity statuses in various life domains and the relationship between identity and well-being. We adopted the three-dimensional model of identity (Crocetti et al., 2008), including: in-depth exploration, commitment, and reconsideration of commitment. Moreover, in accordance with domain-specific approach (Goossens, 2001), we sought to empirically derive identity statuses in various life domains. The participants included 835 emerging adults (Mage = 21.81, SD = 2.33). We examined eight domains previously identified in qualitative research: personality characteristics, past experiences, family, friends and acquaintances, worldview, hobbies and interests, aims and plans for the future, and occupation. To measure three identity processes, we used a modified version of the Utrecht-Management of Identity Commitments Scale (Crocetti et al., 2008) and to measure well-being we used the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (Keyes, 2013). Results indicate that, although the statuses identified in previous research were, to a large extent, replicated (except moratorium), people were classified in different statuses in different domains; thus, we conclude that talking about statuses should be limited to a given domain. Well-being was the highest in achievement statuses and the lowest in diffusion, but only in two examined domains: personality characteristics and past experience.
新生成人在不同生活领域的身份状态和幸福感
本研究的目的是研究不同生活领域的身份状态以及身份与幸福感之间的关系。我们采用了身份的三维模型(Crocetti et al.,2008),包括:对承诺的深入探索、承诺和重新考虑。此外,根据特定领域的方法(Goossens,2001),我们试图从经验上推导各种生活领域中的身份状态。参与者包括835名新兴成年人(Mage=21.81,SD=2.33)。我们检查了之前在定性研究中确定的八个领域:性格特征、过去的经历、家人、朋友和熟人、世界观、爱好和兴趣、未来的目标和计划以及职业。为了测量三个身份过程,我们使用了乌得勒支身份承诺管理量表的修订版(Crocetti et al.,2008),并使用了心理健康连续体简表(Keyes,2013)来测量幸福感。结果表明,尽管先前研究中确定的状态在很大程度上是重复的(暂停除外),但人们在不同的领域中被划分为不同的状态;因此,我们得出的结论是,谈论状态应该局限于给定的领域。幸福感在成就状态方面最高,在扩散方面最低,但仅在两个研究领域:人格特征和过去经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polish Psychological Bulletin
Polish Psychological Bulletin Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信