State-Confessional Interaction in Social Media during the COVID-19 Pandemic

N. S. Zimova, E. Fomin
{"title":"State-Confessional Interaction in Social Media during the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"N. S. Zimova, E. Fomin","doi":"10.22394/1726-1139-2022-11-86-97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the relationship of the Russian Orthodox Church with the government and sanitary and epidemiological authorities during the lockdown of the COVID-19 pandemic in Russia. The statistical method, the discourse analysis and content analysis were applied. The social media analysis system “Kribrum” was used as a technical tool of the study. As a result, we have identified the types of media, popular social media platforms, and important newsworthy events that were discussed on social media. The analysis has showed that the state-confessional interaction in social media is built around the state restrictions on church services. The article demonstrates the change in the attitude of the ROC to restrictions from a sharp rejection to the adaptation. Two models of state-confessional relations have been singled out. According to the first model, believers and members of the priesthood (deacons and priests) ignored the sanitary rules for visiting churches. As for the second model, the leadership of the Russian Orthodox Church adapted the COVID restrictions and strictly followed them, thus, the bishops followed the state power. A rating of the most influential channels on social media that published on the state-confessional topic has been compiled with two polar images of the ROC identified — the state (conservative) and the opposition (liberal). In the state media, the ROC is presented as an important public institution, with which the state authorities and believers consult. They also noted the misunderstanding in relations between the Russian Orthodox Church and the authorities at the beginning of the pandemic. In the opposition media, the ROC is a slow and archaic organization that ignores sanitary rules and does not trust the decisions of the government. Believers and priests are presented as COVID dissidents who criticize the closure of churches and doubt the existence of the coronavirus. It is concluded that the ROC as a religious institution requires a special approach as well as the state and sanitary authorities should discuss with the episcopate and believers the restrictions in churches.","PeriodicalId":33085,"journal":{"name":"Upravlencheskoe konsul''tirovanie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Upravlencheskoe konsul''tirovanie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-11-86-97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyzes the relationship of the Russian Orthodox Church with the government and sanitary and epidemiological authorities during the lockdown of the COVID-19 pandemic in Russia. The statistical method, the discourse analysis and content analysis were applied. The social media analysis system “Kribrum” was used as a technical tool of the study. As a result, we have identified the types of media, popular social media platforms, and important newsworthy events that were discussed on social media. The analysis has showed that the state-confessional interaction in social media is built around the state restrictions on church services. The article demonstrates the change in the attitude of the ROC to restrictions from a sharp rejection to the adaptation. Two models of state-confessional relations have been singled out. According to the first model, believers and members of the priesthood (deacons and priests) ignored the sanitary rules for visiting churches. As for the second model, the leadership of the Russian Orthodox Church adapted the COVID restrictions and strictly followed them, thus, the bishops followed the state power. A rating of the most influential channels on social media that published on the state-confessional topic has been compiled with two polar images of the ROC identified — the state (conservative) and the opposition (liberal). In the state media, the ROC is presented as an important public institution, with which the state authorities and believers consult. They also noted the misunderstanding in relations between the Russian Orthodox Church and the authorities at the beginning of the pandemic. In the opposition media, the ROC is a slow and archaic organization that ignores sanitary rules and does not trust the decisions of the government. Believers and priests are presented as COVID dissidents who criticize the closure of churches and doubt the existence of the coronavirus. It is concluded that the ROC as a religious institution requires a special approach as well as the state and sanitary authorities should discuss with the episcopate and believers the restrictions in churches.
COVID-19大流行期间社交媒体的国家-忏悔互动
本文分析了在俄罗斯新冠肺炎疫情封锁期间,俄罗斯东正教与政府以及卫生和流行病学当局的关系。运用统计学方法、语篇分析法和内容分析法。社交媒体分析系统“Kribrum”被用作研究的技术工具。因此,我们确定了社交媒体上讨论的媒体类型、流行的社交媒体平台和重要的有新闻价值的事件。分析表明,社交媒体上的国家忏悔互动是围绕着国家对教堂服务的限制而建立的。这篇文章展示了中华民国对限制的态度从尖锐的拒绝到适应的转变。国家忏悔关系的两种模式被单独挑选出来。根据第一种模式,信徒和牧师(执事和牧师)无视参观教堂的卫生规定。至于第二种模式,俄罗斯东正教会的领导层适应了新冠肺炎的限制,并严格遵守了这些限制,因此,主教们遵循了国家权力。在社交媒体上发布的关于国家忏悔主题的最具影响力的频道的评级中,列出了中华民国的两个两极形象——国家(保守派)和反对派(自由派)。在官方媒体上,中华民国被视为一个重要的公共机构,国家当局和信徒可以与之协商。他们还注意到,在新冠疫情开始时,俄罗斯东正教与当局之间的关系存在误解。在反对派媒体中,中华民国是一个缓慢而陈旧的组织,无视卫生规则,不信任政府的决定。信徒和牧师被描述为新冠肺炎持不同政见者,他们批评关闭教堂并怀疑冠状病毒的存在。结论是,中华民国作为一个宗教机构需要一种特殊的方法,国家和卫生当局应该与主教和信徒讨论教堂的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信