A ficção e o documento Uma leitura de Mulheres Empilhadas de Patrícia Melo e de Garotas Mortas de Selva Almada

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE
Luciene Azevedo
{"title":"A ficção e o documento Uma leitura de Mulheres Empilhadas de Patrícia Melo e de Garotas Mortas de Selva Almada","authors":"Luciene Azevedo","doi":"10.12957/MATRAGA.2021.53201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main objective of the essay is to reflect on the relationship between literature and the document. If, on the one hand, we can identify a theoretical interest in this relationship and an increase in a nomenclature that tries to capture this impulse – such as the idea of documentary narrations (RUFFEL, 2012), factographies (ZENETTI, 2011) or even what Paula Klein (2019 ) calls a poetics of archives – it is also possible to identify that in recent years many works incorporate photos, archival materials and notes from the writing process to build narratives that challenge their fictional status, although these works do not always repudiate the seal of the novel genre. In this sense, I am interested in rescuing the main argument developed by Flora Sussekind in Tal Brasil, qual Romance (1984) to think about what could be considered another documental shift in contemporary literature. Sussekind states that the cyclical insistence of Brazilian literature on a naturalistic (more than realistic) aesthetic causes the works to deny their own construction as language, once they take as paradigm the objectivity and veracity that the document can guarantee to fiction. If it is true that since the beginning of the 21st century we can speak of a “hunger for the real” (SHIELDS, 2010), the communication wants to investigate how the use of factual data (such as reproduction of legal reports and journalistic stories) can have many nuances. On the one hand, it can serve to reinvigorate a realistic tradition that values the mimicry of fiction in relation to the real, using the document as proof. But it is also possible to think that the tension created by the appropriation of documentary sources by many contemporary narratives might point to an attempt to redefine the value and establish new boundaries for what we understand as fiction. To better discuss this assumption, we will take as our objects the narratives Mulheres Empilhadas (2019), by Patricia Melo and Garotas Mortas (2014), by Selva Almada","PeriodicalId":40929,"journal":{"name":"Matraga-Estudos Linguisticos e Literario","volume":"28 1","pages":"113-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Matraga-Estudos Linguisticos e Literario","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12957/MATRAGA.2021.53201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main objective of the essay is to reflect on the relationship between literature and the document. If, on the one hand, we can identify a theoretical interest in this relationship and an increase in a nomenclature that tries to capture this impulse – such as the idea of documentary narrations (RUFFEL, 2012), factographies (ZENETTI, 2011) or even what Paula Klein (2019 ) calls a poetics of archives – it is also possible to identify that in recent years many works incorporate photos, archival materials and notes from the writing process to build narratives that challenge their fictional status, although these works do not always repudiate the seal of the novel genre. In this sense, I am interested in rescuing the main argument developed by Flora Sussekind in Tal Brasil, qual Romance (1984) to think about what could be considered another documental shift in contemporary literature. Sussekind states that the cyclical insistence of Brazilian literature on a naturalistic (more than realistic) aesthetic causes the works to deny their own construction as language, once they take as paradigm the objectivity and veracity that the document can guarantee to fiction. If it is true that since the beginning of the 21st century we can speak of a “hunger for the real” (SHIELDS, 2010), the communication wants to investigate how the use of factual data (such as reproduction of legal reports and journalistic stories) can have many nuances. On the one hand, it can serve to reinvigorate a realistic tradition that values the mimicry of fiction in relation to the real, using the document as proof. But it is also possible to think that the tension created by the appropriation of documentary sources by many contemporary narratives might point to an attempt to redefine the value and establish new boundaries for what we understand as fiction. To better discuss this assumption, we will take as our objects the narratives Mulheres Empilhadas (2019), by Patricia Melo and Garotas Mortas (2014), by Selva Almada
小说和文件阅读帕特丽夏·梅洛的《堆叠的女人》和塞尔瓦·阿尔马达的死去女孩
本文的主要目的是反思文学与文献之间的关系。一方面,如果我们能够确定对这种关系的理论兴趣,以及试图捕捉这种冲动的命名法的增加——比如纪录片叙事的想法(RUFFEL,2012)、事实记录(ZENETTI,2011),甚至Paula Klein(2019)所称的档案诗学——也有可能确定近年来许多作品都包含了照片,档案材料和写作过程中的笔记,以构建挑战其虚构地位的叙事,尽管这些作品并不总是否定小说类型的印记。从这个意义上说,我有兴趣拯救Flora Sussekind在《Tal Brasil,qual Romance》(1984)中提出的主要论点,以思考当代文学中的另一个文献转变。Sussekind指出,巴西文学对自然主义(而非现实主义)美学的周期性坚持导致作品一旦将文献所能保证的小说的客观性和真实性作为范式,就会否认其自身作为语言的建构。如果说自21世纪初以来,我们真的可以说“渴望真实”(SHIELDS,2010),那么通信希望调查事实数据的使用(如法律报道和新闻报道的复制)是如何产生许多细微差别的。一方面,它可以用文件作为证据,重振一种重视模仿小说与现实的现实传统。但也有可能认为,许多当代叙事对纪录片来源的挪用所造成的紧张可能指向一种重新定义价值的尝试,并为我们所理解的小说建立新的边界。为了更好地讨论这一假设,我们将以Patricia Melo和Garotas Mortas(2014)、Selva Almada的叙事Mulheres Empilhadas(2019)为对象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信