IMPROVING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHERS’ COMPETENCE THROUGH THE NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER METHOD AT SD OF TAMBANG SUB-DISTRICTS IN KAMPAR

Endang Purwanti
{"title":"IMPROVING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHERS’ COMPETENCE THROUGH THE NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER METHOD AT SD OF TAMBANG SUB-DISTRICTS IN KAMPAR","authors":"Endang Purwanti","doi":"10.33578/pjr.v7i4.9509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports the improvement of teacher competence in a teacher work programme at Sub-Districts Tambang elementary school in Kampar through numbered head together method based on the background of the problem. Hence, the formulation of the problem is \"Can the numbered head together method increase elementary school teacher competence at SD Tambang Sub-Districts in Kampar?\". The research is a school action research (SAR). The Kemmis and Mc. Taggart’s model is a spiral from one to another further cycle. The research subjects were teachers at an elementary school in the Tambang sub-district of Kampar. The number of classroom teachers who were the subjects of the research was 12 school principals who were at SD Tambang sub-districts in Kampar. Based on the results of the analysis and discussion, it can be concluded that the numbered head-together method can improve teacher competence. Through numbered head-together method, teachers’ activity becomes more active and teachers tend to be positive to follow the teaching and learning process conducted by the researcher or in the implementation. In cycle I, it can be seen that the teachers’ teaching competence was still relatively good with an average score of 70.29. While the results in cycle II, teachers’ teaching competence reached an average score of 79.52, which was classified as very good.","PeriodicalId":17723,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v7i4.9509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper reports the improvement of teacher competence in a teacher work programme at Sub-Districts Tambang elementary school in Kampar through numbered head together method based on the background of the problem. Hence, the formulation of the problem is "Can the numbered head together method increase elementary school teacher competence at SD Tambang Sub-Districts in Kampar?". The research is a school action research (SAR). The Kemmis and Mc. Taggart’s model is a spiral from one to another further cycle. The research subjects were teachers at an elementary school in the Tambang sub-district of Kampar. The number of classroom teachers who were the subjects of the research was 12 school principals who were at SD Tambang sub-districts in Kampar. Based on the results of the analysis and discussion, it can be concluded that the numbered head-together method can improve teacher competence. Through numbered head-together method, teachers’ activity becomes more active and teachers tend to be positive to follow the teaching and learning process conducted by the researcher or in the implementation. In cycle I, it can be seen that the teachers’ teaching competence was still relatively good with an average score of 70.29. While the results in cycle II, teachers’ teaching competence reached an average score of 79.52, which was classified as very good.
用数字人头合一法提高坎帕坦邦分区SD小学教师的能力
本文报道了基于问题背景,通过编号人头合一法在磅湛县坦邦小学的教师工作计划中提高教师能力的情况。因此,问题的提法是“数字人头合一法能否提高贡巴尔SD Tambang分区的小学教师能力?”。这项研究是一项学校行动研究。Kemmis和Mc.Taggart的模型是从一个循环到另一个循环的螺旋。研究对象是贡巴尔坦邦街道一所小学的教师。作为研究对象的课堂教师人数为12名校长,他们来自贡巴尔的SD Tambang分区。基于分析和讨论的结果,可以得出结论,编号头合一法可以提高教师的能力。通过数字人头法,教师的活动变得更加活跃,教师倾向于积极地遵循研究者或在实施中进行的教学过程。在第一周期中,可以看出教师的教学能力仍然相对较好,平均得分为70.29。在第二周期的结果中,教师的教学能力平均得分为79.52,被评为非常好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
130
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信