Intergroup Bias in Political Decision Making

IF 1.4 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Darby Gilliland, Benjamin R. Warner, Astrid M. Villamil, F. J. Jennings
{"title":"Intergroup Bias in Political Decision Making","authors":"Darby Gilliland, Benjamin R. Warner, Astrid M. Villamil, F. J. Jennings","doi":"10.1080/10510974.2023.2222282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Partisanship is a driving factor of vote choice; however, the mechanism of influence is nuanced. Political parties operate as social identities that motivate elaboration about a candidate and bias image perceptions. In other words, partisanship influences the way in which individuals process information and form political opinions. This influence stems from the processes of ingroup favoritism and outgroup denigration. The present study employs an experimental design and an identity-motivated elaborative theoretical perspective to analyze the elaborative and perceptual process of determining candidate support. Though both congruent and incongruent partisan social identities influence intentions to vote for a candidate, they do so at different strengths and through different information-processing mechanisms. Specifically, ingroup favoritism is primarily automatic, whereas outgroup denigration is both deliberative and automatic.","PeriodicalId":47080,"journal":{"name":"Communication Studies","volume":"74 1","pages":"428 - 446"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2023.2222282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Partisanship is a driving factor of vote choice; however, the mechanism of influence is nuanced. Political parties operate as social identities that motivate elaboration about a candidate and bias image perceptions. In other words, partisanship influences the way in which individuals process information and form political opinions. This influence stems from the processes of ingroup favoritism and outgroup denigration. The present study employs an experimental design and an identity-motivated elaborative theoretical perspective to analyze the elaborative and perceptual process of determining candidate support. Though both congruent and incongruent partisan social identities influence intentions to vote for a candidate, they do so at different strengths and through different information-processing mechanisms. Specifically, ingroup favoritism is primarily automatic, whereas outgroup denigration is both deliberative and automatic.
政治决策中的群体间偏见
党派之争是选票选择的驱动因素;然而,影响的机制是微妙的。政党作为社会身份运作,激发对候选人的阐述和偏见的形象感知。换句话说,党派之争影响着个人处理信息和形成政治观点的方式。这种影响源于群体内部的偏袒和群体外部的诋毁。本研究采用实验设计和身份驱动的详尽理论视角来分析确定候选人支持的详尽和感性过程。尽管一致和不一致的党派社会身份都会影响投票给候选人的意图,但它们的优势和信息处理机制不同。具体来说,内部群体的偏袒主要是自动的,而外部群体的诋毁则是深思熟虑和自动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Communication Studies
Communication Studies COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信