{"title":"“Intercultural Mimesis,” Empire, and Spirits","authors":"Alexandra Kaloyanides","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.4727542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article surveys the impact of the concept of “intercultural mimesis” from Charles Hallisey’s “Roads Taken and Not Taken in the Study of Theravāda Buddhism,” with specific attention to the way this chapter guides scholars toward more localized examinations of how representations of Buddhism are produced. The article provides examples of intercultural mimesis from nineteenth-century Burma that suggest that future work on Theravada Buddhism should develop “intercultural mimesis” in two ways: 1) revitalized attention to how structures of empire shape and are shaped by local interactions and 2) new experimentation with writing histories of Asian cultures that include nonhuman beings such as spirits, gods, and ghosts. The author argues that these directions will advance Hallisey’s call to investigate Buddhism’s multiple mediators and to resist giving too much power over to imperial endeavors.","PeriodicalId":37110,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Buddhism","volume":"22 1","pages":"219-227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Buddhism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4727542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This article surveys the impact of the concept of “intercultural mimesis” from Charles Hallisey’s “Roads Taken and Not Taken in the Study of Theravāda Buddhism,” with specific attention to the way this chapter guides scholars toward more localized examinations of how representations of Buddhism are produced. The article provides examples of intercultural mimesis from nineteenth-century Burma that suggest that future work on Theravada Buddhism should develop “intercultural mimesis” in two ways: 1) revitalized attention to how structures of empire shape and are shaped by local interactions and 2) new experimentation with writing histories of Asian cultures that include nonhuman beings such as spirits, gods, and ghosts. The author argues that these directions will advance Hallisey’s call to investigate Buddhism’s multiple mediators and to resist giving too much power over to imperial endeavors.
本文调查了查尔斯·哈利西(Charles Hallisey)的《上座部佛教研究中所走的路和未走的路》(Roads Taked and Not Taked in the Study of Theravāda Buddhism)中“跨文化模仿”概念的影响,并特别关注本章如何引导学者对佛教表征的产生进行更本地化的研究。这篇文章提供了19世纪缅甸跨文化模仿的例子,表明未来关于上座部佛教的工作应该以两种方式发展“跨文化模仿”:1)重新关注帝国结构是如何形成的,以及如何由当地互动塑造的;2)对亚洲文化的书写史进行新的实验,其中包括非人类,如精灵、神和鬼。作者认为,这些方向将推动哈利西的呼吁,即调查佛教的多重中介,并抵制将过多的权力交给帝国的努力。