Report of a Track Seeding of Thyroid Papillary Carcinoma During Robot- Assisted Transaxillary Thyroidectomy

E. Chabrillac, S. Zerdoud, P. Graff-Cailleaud, S. Fontaine, J. Sarini
{"title":"Report of a Track Seeding of Thyroid Papillary Carcinoma During Robot- Assisted Transaxillary Thyroidectomy","authors":"E. Chabrillac, S. Zerdoud, P. Graff-Cailleaud, S. Fontaine, J. Sarini","doi":"10.4172/2167-7948.1000218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Robotic Thyroidectomy (RT) is a minimally invasive surgical technique initially developed in Asia, for cultural reasons. The principles of its use are still undergoing development. Showing to all appearances satisfying outcomes, the long-time safety and medico-economic benefit of the procedure have not been established yet. The use of this technique in thyroid carcinology remains rare, and provides specific risks, not encountered with the Open Thyroidectomy (OT). \nPatient Findings: We report the case of a patient who underwent a two-stages RT for a pT3 follicular carcinoma causing dissemination along the surgical track, in spite of the radioactive iodine treatment. \nSummary: This case reminds us the limits of the RT in the oncologic field and the lack of perspective, with the recent discovery of the risk of dissemination along the surgical track. Our synthetic review of the literature comparing RT to OT shows the advantages and limitations of the RT. \nConclusions: The development of the RT should pursue its way, but the use of this procedure in thyroid carcinology must remain reasonable. Further data is necessary to assess the long-term oncologic safety, regarding even the uncommon risks, as the track seeding. To this day, OT remains the gold standard for the complex thyroid pathologies.","PeriodicalId":91565,"journal":{"name":"Journal of thyroid disorders & therapy","volume":"6 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2167-7948.1000218","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of thyroid disorders & therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-7948.1000218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The Robotic Thyroidectomy (RT) is a minimally invasive surgical technique initially developed in Asia, for cultural reasons. The principles of its use are still undergoing development. Showing to all appearances satisfying outcomes, the long-time safety and medico-economic benefit of the procedure have not been established yet. The use of this technique in thyroid carcinology remains rare, and provides specific risks, not encountered with the Open Thyroidectomy (OT). Patient Findings: We report the case of a patient who underwent a two-stages RT for a pT3 follicular carcinoma causing dissemination along the surgical track, in spite of the radioactive iodine treatment. Summary: This case reminds us the limits of the RT in the oncologic field and the lack of perspective, with the recent discovery of the risk of dissemination along the surgical track. Our synthetic review of the literature comparing RT to OT shows the advantages and limitations of the RT. Conclusions: The development of the RT should pursue its way, but the use of this procedure in thyroid carcinology must remain reasonable. Further data is necessary to assess the long-term oncologic safety, regarding even the uncommon risks, as the track seeding. To this day, OT remains the gold standard for the complex thyroid pathologies.
机器人辅助下经腋窝甲状腺切除术中甲状腺乳头状癌轨迹播种的报道
背景:机器人甲状腺切除术(RT)是一种微创手术技术,最初是由于文化原因在亚洲发展起来的。其使用原则仍在发展中。从各方面来看,该手术的效果令人满意,但其长期安全性和医学经济效益尚未确定。这种技术在甲状腺癌中的应用仍然很少见,并且具有开放性甲状腺切除术(OT)所没有的特定风险。患者的发现:我们报告的情况下,患者接受了两期放疗的pT3滤泡癌引起沿手术轨迹播散,尽管放射性碘治疗。总结:这个病例提醒我们,随着最近发现沿手术轨迹传播的风险,RT在肿瘤学领域的局限性和缺乏视角。我们综合回顾了对比放疗和OT的文献,发现了放疗的优势和局限性。结论:放疗的发展应该遵循它的方式,但在甲状腺癌中的应用必须保持合理。需要进一步的数据来评估长期的肿瘤安全性,即使是不常见的风险,也需要作为跟踪播种。直到今天,OT仍然是复杂甲状腺病理的金标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书