Effectiveness of metacognitive interventions in tertiary EFL contexts: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 3.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Meechai Wongdaeng, S. Higgins
{"title":"Effectiveness of metacognitive interventions in tertiary EFL contexts: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Meechai Wongdaeng, S. Higgins","doi":"10.1080/17501229.2022.2146122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Purpose Despite numerous studies reporting beneficial effects of metacognition for improving learning or developing self-regulated learners, the evidence from tertiary English as a Foreign Language (EFL) settings is still unclear as synthesis studies in this field remain rare. To address the gap, this study sought to identify, examine and synthesise relevant studies on the effectiveness of metacognitive interventions in tertiary EFL contexts. Design The study adopted a systematic review approach to include all relevant studies that could be identified for analysis. Seven data sources were searched to identify studies which were, then, screened for relevance based on a pre-specified protocol. The included studies underwent data extraction and quality appraisal before data syntheses via a meta-analysis and a thematic synthesis. Findings The results indicate the high potential of metacognitive interventions for EFL learners and the fundamental role of explicit instruction, clear pedagogical sequencing and the regulation of skills, rather than merely focusing on knowledge about metacognition, for the successful interventions. Moreover, limitations in the data quality suggest that more rigorous investigations are needed to provide a more overarching overview of the impact of metacognition-based studies in tertiary EFL contexts. Originality/Value As synthesis studies on the topic are scarcely available in tertiary EFL contexts, this study can offer a more evident indication of the effectiveness of metacognitive instruction for EFL learners. From comprehensive and rigorous reviewing, it also proposes some practical guidelines and implications for further EFL policy and practices.","PeriodicalId":45930,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching","volume":"17 1","pages":"795 - 811"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2022.2146122","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose Despite numerous studies reporting beneficial effects of metacognition for improving learning or developing self-regulated learners, the evidence from tertiary English as a Foreign Language (EFL) settings is still unclear as synthesis studies in this field remain rare. To address the gap, this study sought to identify, examine and synthesise relevant studies on the effectiveness of metacognitive interventions in tertiary EFL contexts. Design The study adopted a systematic review approach to include all relevant studies that could be identified for analysis. Seven data sources were searched to identify studies which were, then, screened for relevance based on a pre-specified protocol. The included studies underwent data extraction and quality appraisal before data syntheses via a meta-analysis and a thematic synthesis. Findings The results indicate the high potential of metacognitive interventions for EFL learners and the fundamental role of explicit instruction, clear pedagogical sequencing and the regulation of skills, rather than merely focusing on knowledge about metacognition, for the successful interventions. Moreover, limitations in the data quality suggest that more rigorous investigations are needed to provide a more overarching overview of the impact of metacognition-based studies in tertiary EFL contexts. Originality/Value As synthesis studies on the topic are scarcely available in tertiary EFL contexts, this study can offer a more evident indication of the effectiveness of metacognitive instruction for EFL learners. From comprehensive and rigorous reviewing, it also proposes some practical guidelines and implications for further EFL policy and practices.
元认知干预在第三外语语境中的有效性:来自系统回顾和元分析的证据
摘要目的尽管许多研究报告了元认知对改善学习或发展自我调节学习者的有益影响,但由于该领域的综合研究仍然很少,来自高等外语环境的证据仍然不清楚。为了解决这一差距,本研究试图识别、检验和综合关于高等英语环境中元认知干预有效性的相关研究。设计该研究采用了系统审查的方法,包括所有可以确定进行分析的相关研究。搜索了七个数据源,以确定研究,然后根据预先指定的方案对其相关性进行筛选。纳入的研究在通过荟萃分析和专题综合进行数据综合之前进行了数据提取和质量评估。研究结果表明,元认知干预对英语学习者具有很高的潜力,明确的教学顺序和技能调节,而不仅仅是关注元认知知识,对成功的干预具有根本作用。此外,数据质量的局限性表明,需要进行更严格的调查,以更全面地了解基于元认知的研究在高等英语环境中的影响。原创性/价值由于在高等英语环境中很少有关于该主题的综合研究,本研究可以更明显地表明元认知教学对英语学习者的有效性。通过全面和严格的审查,它还提出了一些实用的指导方针和对进一步的EFL政策和实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching is an international refereed journal devoted to innovative approaches to methodologies and pedagogies in language learning and teaching. It publishes research articles, review articles and book/materials reviews. It draws on a range of disciplines that share a focus on exploring new approaches to language learning and teaching from a learner-centred perspective. It will appeal to anyone interested in the development of, research into or practical application of new methodologies in language teaching and learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信