Expanding Use of cfDNA Screening in Pregnancy: Current and Emerging Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues.

IF 1.4 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Current genetic medicine reports Pub Date : 2017-03-01 Epub Date: 2017-02-11 DOI:10.1007/s40142-017-0113-x
Lindsay Parham, Marsha Michie, Megan Allyse
{"title":"Expanding Use of cfDNA Screening in Pregnancy: Current and Emerging Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues.","authors":"Lindsay Parham, Marsha Michie, Megan Allyse","doi":"10.1007/s40142-017-0113-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>In 2011, screening platforms became available in the US that detect and analyze fragments of cell-free placental DNA (cfDNA) in maternal blood serum. Marketed as noninvasive prenatal tests (NIPT), cfDNA screening is more accurate than previously available serum screening tests for certain aneuploidies. The combination of a noninvasive procedure, high specificity and sensitivity, and lower false positive rates for some aneuploidies (most notably Down's syndrome) has led to broad clinician and patient adoption. New ethical, legal, and social issues arise from the increased use and expanded implementation of cfDNA in pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recently, several professional associations have amended their guidelines on cfDNA, removing language recommending its use in only \"high-risk\" pregnancies in favor of making cfDNA screening an available option for women with \"low-risk\" pregnancies as well. At the same time, commercial cfDNA screening laboratories continue to expand the range of available test panels. As a result, the future of prenatal screening will likely include a broader range of genetic tests in a wider range of patients.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This article addresses the ethical, legal, and social issues related to the shift in guidance and expanded use of cfDNA in pregnant women, including concerns regarding routinized testing, an unmet and increasing demand for genetic counseling services, social and economic disparities in access, impact on groups living with disabling conditions, and provider liability.</p>","PeriodicalId":72731,"journal":{"name":"Current genetic medicine reports","volume":"5 1","pages":"44-53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10715629/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current genetic medicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40142-017-0113-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: In 2011, screening platforms became available in the US that detect and analyze fragments of cell-free placental DNA (cfDNA) in maternal blood serum. Marketed as noninvasive prenatal tests (NIPT), cfDNA screening is more accurate than previously available serum screening tests for certain aneuploidies. The combination of a noninvasive procedure, high specificity and sensitivity, and lower false positive rates for some aneuploidies (most notably Down's syndrome) has led to broad clinician and patient adoption. New ethical, legal, and social issues arise from the increased use and expanded implementation of cfDNA in pregnancy.

Recent findings: Recently, several professional associations have amended their guidelines on cfDNA, removing language recommending its use in only "high-risk" pregnancies in favor of making cfDNA screening an available option for women with "low-risk" pregnancies as well. At the same time, commercial cfDNA screening laboratories continue to expand the range of available test panels. As a result, the future of prenatal screening will likely include a broader range of genetic tests in a wider range of patients.

Summary: This article addresses the ethical, legal, and social issues related to the shift in guidance and expanded use of cfDNA in pregnant women, including concerns regarding routinized testing, an unmet and increasing demand for genetic counseling services, social and economic disparities in access, impact on groups living with disabling conditions, and provider liability.

扩大妊娠cfDNA筛查的使用:当前和新出现的伦理、法律和社会问题
综述目的:2011 年,美国推出了检测和分析母体血清中无细胞胎盘 DNA(cfDNA)片段的筛查平台。作为无创产前检测(NIPT),cfDNA 筛查比以前的血清筛查某些非整倍体更准确。非侵入性程序、高特异性和高灵敏度以及某些非整倍体(最明显的是唐氏综合症)较低的假阳性率,这些优点结合在一起,已被临床医生和患者广泛采用。随着妊娠期 cfDNA 应用的增加和范围的扩大,出现了新的伦理、法律和社会问题:最近,一些专业协会修订了其关于 cfDNA 的指南,删除了建议仅在 "高风险 "妊娠中使用 cfDNA 的措辞,转而将 cfDNA 筛查作为 "低风险 "妊娠妇女的一种选择。与此同时,商业化的 cfDNA 筛查实验室也在不断扩大可用检测项目的范围。因此,未来的产前筛查将可能包括对更多患者进行更广泛的基因检测。摘要:本文探讨了与指导原则的转变和扩大 cfDNA 在孕妇中的应用有关的伦理、法律和社会问题,包括对常规检测的担忧、对遗传咨询服务的未满足且日益增长的需求、在获取遗传咨询服务方面的社会和经济差异、对残疾群体的影响以及医疗服务提供者的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信