How Accurately FNAC Reflects the Breast Papillary Lesions?

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Journal of Cytology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-17 DOI:10.4103/joc.joc_129_21
Gülistan Gümrükçü, Meryem Doğan, Nilüfer Gürsan, Barış Boylu, Erhan Ekren, Fügen Vardar Aker
{"title":"How Accurately FNAC Reflects the Breast Papillary Lesions?","authors":"Gülistan Gümrükçü, Meryem Doğan, Nilüfer Gürsan, Barış Boylu, Erhan Ekren, Fügen Vardar Aker","doi":"10.4103/joc.joc_129_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Diagnosis of papillary lesions of the breast by fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is problematic. For this reason, it is situated in the indeterminate zone in classification systems.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To ascertain the accuracy of cytological diagnosis of papillary lesions in distinguishing papillary lesions from non-papillary lesions and to determine whether papillomas can be reliably distinguished from malignant papillary lesions by FNAC.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 346 cases with the diagnoses of breast papillary lesions were selected among 5112 breast FNAC procedures performed in our center. One hundred and thirty-nine cases with excised lesions were included in this study, and their corresponding histology was reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Papillary lesion diagnosis was confirmed by histopathology in 103 (74.1%) of 139 patients. Cytology and histopathology results were not found to be compatible in 35 (25.2%) cases. The diagnostic accuracy of distinguishing papillary breast lesions as malignant or benign was assessed statistically. According to the cytology-histology comparison, one case was evaluated as false negative (FN) and twelve cases as false positive (FP). Overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of FNAC in distinguishing papillary lesions as benign or malignant were calculated as 87%, 97%, 83%, 72%, and 98%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The diagnostic accuracy of papillary breast lesions classified by FNAC might be improved by careful evaluation together with cytological, radiological, and clinical findings (triple test). Cell block may allow more accurate evaluation of the papillary lesion and can be applied to immunohistochemical examination. It may also facilitate the differentiation of benign/malignant papillary lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50217,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cytology","volume":"39 1","pages":"30-36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8955696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cytology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joc.joc_129_21","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Diagnosis of papillary lesions of the breast by fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is problematic. For this reason, it is situated in the indeterminate zone in classification systems.

Aims: To ascertain the accuracy of cytological diagnosis of papillary lesions in distinguishing papillary lesions from non-papillary lesions and to determine whether papillomas can be reliably distinguished from malignant papillary lesions by FNAC.

Material and methods: A total of 346 cases with the diagnoses of breast papillary lesions were selected among 5112 breast FNAC procedures performed in our center. One hundred and thirty-nine cases with excised lesions were included in this study, and their corresponding histology was reviewed.

Results: Papillary lesion diagnosis was confirmed by histopathology in 103 (74.1%) of 139 patients. Cytology and histopathology results were not found to be compatible in 35 (25.2%) cases. The diagnostic accuracy of distinguishing papillary breast lesions as malignant or benign was assessed statistically. According to the cytology-histology comparison, one case was evaluated as false negative (FN) and twelve cases as false positive (FP). Overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of FNAC in distinguishing papillary lesions as benign or malignant were calculated as 87%, 97%, 83%, 72%, and 98%, respectively.

Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of papillary breast lesions classified by FNAC might be improved by careful evaluation together with cytological, radiological, and clinical findings (triple test). Cell block may allow more accurate evaluation of the papillary lesion and can be applied to immunohistochemical examination. It may also facilitate the differentiation of benign/malignant papillary lesions.

FNAC如何准确反映乳腺乳头状病变?
背景:细针抽吸细胞学(FNAC)对乳腺乳头状病变的诊断是有问题的。因此,它在分类系统中处于不确定区。目的:确定乳头状病变的细胞学诊断在区分乳头状病变和非乳头状病变方面的准确性,并确定FNAC是否可以可靠地区分乳头状瘤和恶性乳头状病变。材料和方法:在我们中心进行的5112例乳腺FNAC手术中,共选择346例诊断为乳腺乳头状病变的患者。本研究包括139例切除病变,并对其相应的组织学进行了回顾。结果:139例患者中,103例(74.1%)经组织病理学检查确诊为乳头病变。35例(25.2%)病例的细胞学和组织病理学结果不一致。对区分乳腺乳头状病变为恶性或良性的诊断准确性进行了统计评估。根据细胞学-组织学比较,1例评估为假阴性(FN),12例评估为伪阳性(FP)。FNAC在区分乳头状病变为良性或恶性方面的总体准确率、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为87%、97%、83%、72%和98%。结论:通过仔细评估细胞学、放射学和临床表现(三重检验),可以提高FNAC分类的乳头状乳腺病变的诊断准确性。细胞阻滞可以更准确地评估乳头状病变,并可应用于免疫组织化学检查。它还可以促进良性/恶性乳头状病变的分化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cytology
Journal of Cytology MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
34
审稿时长
46 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cytology is the official Quarterly publication of the Indian Academy of Cytologists. It is in the 25th year of publication in the year 2008. The journal covers all aspects of diagnostic cytology, including fine needle aspiration cytology, gynecological and non-gynecological cytology. Articles on ancillary techniques, like cytochemistry, immunocytochemistry, electron microscopy, molecular cytopathology, as applied to cytological material are also welcome. The journal gives preference to clinically oriented studies over experimental and animal studies. The Journal would publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信