How do tradeoffs in satellite spatial and temporal resolution impact snow water equivalent reconstruction?

IF 4.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Cryosphere Pub Date : 2023-07-06 DOI:10.5194/tc-17-2629-2023
Edward H. Bair, J. Dozier, K. Rittger, T. Stillinger, W. Kleiber, R. Davis
{"title":"How do tradeoffs in satellite spatial and temporal resolution impact snow water equivalent reconstruction?","authors":"Edward H. Bair, J. Dozier, K. Rittger, T. Stillinger, W. Kleiber, R. Davis","doi":"10.5194/tc-17-2629-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Given the tradeoffs between spatial and temporal resolution, questions about\nresolution optimality are fundamental to the study of global snow. Answers\nto these questions will inform future scientific priorities and mission\nspecifications. Heterogeneity of mountain snowpacks drives a need for daily\nsnow cover mapping at the slope scale (≤30 m) that is unmet for a\nvariety of scientific users, ranging from hydrologists to the military to\nwildlife biologists. But finer spatial resolution usually requires coarser\ntemporal or spectral resolution. Thus, no single sensor can meet all these\nneeds. Recently, constellations of satellites and fusion techniques have\nmade noteworthy progress. The efficacy of two such recent advances is\nexamined: (1) a fused MODIS–Landsat product with daily 30 m spatial\nresolution and (2) a harmonized Landsat 8 and Sentinel 2A and B (HLS) product with\n3–4 d temporal and 30 m spatial resolution. State-of-the-art spectral unmixing\ntechniques are applied to surface reflectance products from 1 and 2 to\ncreate snow cover and albedo maps. Then an energy balance model was run to\nreconstruct snow water equivalent (SWE). For validation, lidar-based\nAirborne Snow Observatory SWE estimates were used. Results show that\nreconstructed SWE forced with 30 m resolution snow cover has lower bias, a\nmeasure of basin-wide accuracy, than the baseline case using MODIS (463 m\ncell size) but greater mean absolute error, a measure of per-pixel\naccuracy. However, the differences in errors may be within uncertainties\nfrom scaling artifacts, e.g., basin boundary delineation. Other explanations\nare (1) the importance of daily acquisitions and (2) the limitations of\ndownscaled forcings for reconstruction. Conclusions are as follows: (1) spectrally\nunmixed snow cover and snow albedo from MODIS continue to provide accurate\nforcings for snow models and (2) finer spatial and temporal resolution\nthrough sensor design, fusion techniques, and satellite constellations are\nthe future for Earth observations, but existing moderate-resolution sensors\nstill offer value.\n","PeriodicalId":56315,"journal":{"name":"Cryosphere","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cryosphere","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2629-2023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract. Given the tradeoffs between spatial and temporal resolution, questions about resolution optimality are fundamental to the study of global snow. Answers to these questions will inform future scientific priorities and mission specifications. Heterogeneity of mountain snowpacks drives a need for daily snow cover mapping at the slope scale (≤30 m) that is unmet for a variety of scientific users, ranging from hydrologists to the military to wildlife biologists. But finer spatial resolution usually requires coarser temporal or spectral resolution. Thus, no single sensor can meet all these needs. Recently, constellations of satellites and fusion techniques have made noteworthy progress. The efficacy of two such recent advances is examined: (1) a fused MODIS–Landsat product with daily 30 m spatial resolution and (2) a harmonized Landsat 8 and Sentinel 2A and B (HLS) product with 3–4 d temporal and 30 m spatial resolution. State-of-the-art spectral unmixing techniques are applied to surface reflectance products from 1 and 2 to create snow cover and albedo maps. Then an energy balance model was run to reconstruct snow water equivalent (SWE). For validation, lidar-based Airborne Snow Observatory SWE estimates were used. Results show that reconstructed SWE forced with 30 m resolution snow cover has lower bias, a measure of basin-wide accuracy, than the baseline case using MODIS (463 m cell size) but greater mean absolute error, a measure of per-pixel accuracy. However, the differences in errors may be within uncertainties from scaling artifacts, e.g., basin boundary delineation. Other explanations are (1) the importance of daily acquisitions and (2) the limitations of downscaled forcings for reconstruction. Conclusions are as follows: (1) spectrally unmixed snow cover and snow albedo from MODIS continue to provide accurate forcings for snow models and (2) finer spatial and temporal resolution through sensor design, fusion techniques, and satellite constellations are the future for Earth observations, but existing moderate-resolution sensors still offer value.
卫星空间和时间分辨率的权衡如何影响雪水当量重建?
摘要考虑到空间分辨率和时间分辨率之间的权衡,关于分辨率最优性的问题是全球雪研究的基础。对这些问题的回答将为未来的科学优先事项和任务规范提供信息。山区积雪的异质性促使人们需要在坡度范围内(≤30 m) 从水文学家到军事生命生物学家,许多科学用户都没有满足这一要求。但更精细的空间分辨率通常需要粗略的时间或光谱分辨率。因此,没有一个传感器能够满足所有这些需求。近年来,卫星星座和融合技术取得了显著进展。对两项最新进展的疗效进行了检验:(1)MODIS-Landsat融合产品,每日30 m空间分辨率和(2)一个协调的Landsat 8和Sentinel 2A和B(HLS)产品,具有3-4 d时态和30 m空间分辨率。将最先进的光谱分解技术应用于1和2的表面反射率产品,以创建积雪和反照率图。然后运用能量平衡模型建立了雪水当量。为了验证,使用了基于激光雷达的机载雪观测站SWE估计值。结果表明,用30 m分辨率的积雪具有比使用MODIS(463 mcell大小)但是更大的平均绝对误差(每像素精度的度量)。然而,误差的差异可能在缩放伪影的不确定性范围内,例如盆地边界描绘。其他解释是(1)日常采集的重要性和(2)重建的缩小力的局限性。结论如下:(1)MODIS的光谱未混合积雪和雪反照率继续为雪模型提供准确的预测;(2)通过传感器设计、融合技术和卫星星座获得更精细的空间和时间分辨率是地球观测的未来,但现有的中分辨率传感器将提供价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cryosphere
Cryosphere GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
17.30%
发文量
240
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cryosphere (TC) is a not-for-profit international scientific journal dedicated to the publication and discussion of research articles, short communications, and review papers on all aspects of frozen water and ground on Earth and on other planetary bodies. The main subject areas are the following: ice sheets and glaciers; planetary ice bodies; permafrost and seasonally frozen ground; seasonal snow cover; sea ice; river and lake ice; remote sensing, numerical modelling, in situ and laboratory studies of the above and including studies of the interaction of the cryosphere with the rest of the climate system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信